BETA

Activities of Josef ZIELENIEC related to 2008/2104(INI)

Plenary speeches (1)

Recommendation to the Council on the new EU-Russia agreement (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/2104(INI)

Amendments (16)

Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Citation 6 c (new)
1 2– having regard to the unprecedented disruption of supply of Russian gas to the European Union in January 2009, Texts adopted, P6_TA-PROV(2008)0336. Texts adopted, P6_TA-PROV(2008)0336.
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital A
A. whereas EU relations with Russia remain very important for the purposes of pragmatic cooperation, and whereas the EU shares with Russia not only economic and trade interests but also an objective to act in the international arena, as well as in the European neighbourhood; whereas enhanced cooperation and good- neighbourly relations between the EU and Russia should be of key importance to the stability, security and prosperity of the whole of Europe; whereas EU relations with Russia should be based on mutual respect but also on the respect by each of the parties of sovereign nations in their neighbourhood;
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital C
C. whereas Russia should have a responsibility to contribute to financial and political stability and the sense of security in Europe and in the world, in particular inby a responsible and peaceful approach to the shared neighbourhood, respecting the sovereignty of all of its neighbours, but also as regards issues such as nuclear proliferation, the fight against terrorism, drug trafficking and organised crime, as well as climate change and the world financial order,
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital D
D. whereas the negotiations on a new agreement aimed at enhancing cooperation between the EU and the Russian Federation should address the issue of the full compliance by Russia with the agreements signed on 12 August and 8 September 2008 in respect of the conflict in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, since its compliance with these agreements should be an indispensable condition for the successful completion of the talks, together with tangible assurances from Russia that it will not resort to the use of force against any of its neighbours,
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital E
E. whereas the conclusion of an agreement on future cooperation remains of the utmost importance for further development and intensification of cooperation between the two sides; whereas the EU’s policy towards Russia must be based on unity and solidarity and whereas the EU should have a common approach and speak with one voice,
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital K
K. whereas, in terms of energy security, relations between the EU and Russia offer great potential for positive and constructive mutual interdependence, provided that the partnership is based on the principle of non-discrimination and fair treatment, and on equal market conditions, as provided for in the ECT; whereas the recent gas crisis proved the necessity of the adoption of, and respect for, a set of rules based, as a minimum, on the current ECT,
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas the EU has often failed to speak with a common voice in its relations with Russia; whereas a functioning mechanism should exist within the Council, under the responsibility of the High Representative, which would enable Member States to consult each other sufficiently in advance on every bilateral issue with Russia which could have repercussions on other Member States and the EU as a whole,
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point a
a) continue to insist on a broad and wide- ranging agreement covering the whole range of cooperation between the parties and representing a step up from the current PCA, both in terms of the depth of the commitments and the subjects covered; insist that the agreement should comprise enforcement mechanisms for its relevant parts;
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point a a (new)
aa) insist on the fact that Russia’s violating of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia and its role in the gas dispute at the beginning of 2009 seriously endangered relations between the EU and Russia and the negotiations on the new agreement;
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point a b (new)
ab) put into place a mechanism of consultation, under the responsibility of the High Representative, which would enable Member states to consult each other sufficiently in advance on every bilateral issue – agreement or dispute – with Russia which could have repercussions on other Member States and the EU as a whole, allowing thus for as coherent a position of the EU as possible by assuring that the concerns of every Member State are fully taken into account, and excluding the possibility for one Member State to block the negotiations at a later stage;
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point c b (new)
cb) continue to maintain the support for Russia’s WTO accession and support the further opening of the Russian economy; regard full respect for the WTO rules by Russia as a necessary precondition and a minimum standard for the creation of a free-trade zone between the EU and Russia, which continues to be a long-term objective;
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point f
f) call on the Russian Government to demonstrate its commitment to resolving, together with Georgia and the EU, in a constructive and peaceful manner the ‘modalities of security and stability in Abkhazia and South Ossetia’, as it was agreed in the agreement of 8 August 2008; call on the Russian Government to provide tangible assurances that Russia will not resort to the use of force against any of its neighbours;
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point h a (new)
ha) insist that visa facilitation for students, researchers and businessmen should be a priority in order to promote people-to-people contacts; insist, however, that any further uplift of the visa regime with Russia shall be conditioned by a corresponding uplift of the visa arrangements with ENP countries in order to avoid any discrepancies;
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point g
g) raise concerns with the Russian government decision to recognise Abkhazia and South Ossetia and establish military bases in these regions, since these steps undermine the territorial integrity of Georgia, as insisted upon by the relevant UN resolutions, and call into question Russia’s rolemaintain that Russia cannot be considered as an impartial moderator in the peace process;
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point n a (new)
na) raise concerns about the changes brought to the Russian legislation by the law on investment in the strategic sectors; maintain that reciprocity, sustainability, transparency, predictability, reliability, non-discrimination and good governance should be leading principles in economic and trade relations between the EU and Russia, including in the field of foreign investment;
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 2
2. Asks the Council and the Commission to keep the European Parliament and its Committee on Foreign Affairs regularly and fully informed of progress of the negotiations;
2009/02/26
Committee: AFET