BETA

15 Amendments of Teresa RIERA MADURELL related to 2011/2107(INI)

Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Takes the view that EU research funds and programmes and the Structural and Cohesion Funds have different aims and, as such, should be kept separate, although on a complementary basis; urges that they be coordinated in a clearer and more systematic fashion in order to encourage 'smart specialisation' on the regions' part;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that although excellence is considered the main general criterion for funding, it must be borne in mind that the nature of excellence differs with the type of participant or the very nature of the research and innovation project (the excellence criterion for a rdifferent participants start out from different situations, and that it is therefore necesesarch institution is not the same as for an individual researcher or for an SME, and also differs between fundamental and applied projects)y to tailor the prior support measures for each to the specific circumstances applying;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
1st layer: Capacity-building and iInfrastructure
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. This layer covers the EU funds associated with infrastructure (in the wider sense, including the institutional one) and capacity-building;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. The funding scheme within this layer includes the funding provided through the EIT, the part of the FP concerning the Capacities Programme and Marie Curie initiatives, the European funding components of large-scale projects, access to loans by the EIB (covering projects over EUR 50 million), grants associated with the above- mentioned components of the FP, and cooperation with Structural Funds associated with infrastructure;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses the need to promote open and excellence-based access to the infrastructures concerned;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. This layer is the space for overall research, fundamental and applied, andincluding the social sciences and humanities; coordination participants a, reinforcing the Cooperation Programme and encouraging participation by SMEs with specific measures universities and research centres/institutes, although the industrial sector should be encouraged to participateder collaborative projects, and with emphasis on creative capacity via the funding earmarked through the EIT and the Marie Curie initiatives;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that the European Research Council (ERC) has proved to be successful and a strengthening element of the European Research Area (ERA); stresses the need to increase the proportion of the budget dedicated to grants to young researchers, as well to strengthen Marie Curie actions and initiatives, thus reinforcing mobility; calls for the implementation of the necessary measures to cope with the precarious conditions of scientific workers in the EU as a means to attract and retain researchers, bearing in mind that precarious working conditions (which are still more prevalent for women) constitute a bottleneck on the way to achieving excellence in Europe;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses the need to increase the proportion of the budget dedicated to grants to young researchers, as well to strengthen Marie Curie actions and initiatives, thus reinforcing mobility; calls for the implementation of the necessary measures to cope with the precarious conditions of scientific workers in the EU as a means to attract and retain researchers, bearing in mind that precarious working conditions (which are still more prevalent for women) constitute an obstacle on the way to achieving excellence in Europe; considers it necessary to bring Marie Curie actions and initiatives closer to the industrial sector's real needs as regards research training, career development and the transfer of knowledge with the academic world;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Takes the view that European risk capital, stemming from both public and private funds, is also a fundamental tool for co-financing the full innovation cycle from research to market uptake; highlights the success of the Risk Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) and proposes boosting European risk capital with cross- border risk capital initiatives supplemented by contributions from European funds;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Takes the view, likewise, that the future framework programme should promote innovation activities through innovative public procurement;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Stresses, however, that some of the CIP instruments could become the natural extension of the future framework programme, providing continuity for European research and innovation projects; takes the view that the technology developed under framework programme projects could be extended to innovative projects: - disseminating their use in various industrial and service sectors, - launching further additional applications in related or complementary fields;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 305 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Recommends defining a limited set of common rules that are easy to interpret and that would apply to all programmes and instruments, governed by the basic principle that public funds are managed by public bodies and monitored by the Commission;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 358 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Takes the view that priority should be given to public-private partnerships (PPPs), as established in the Recovery Plan, in preference to JTIs (Joint Technology Initiatives); recommends offering a specific common framework for all PPPs, with clear, simplified common conditions, clearly separating the role of the private sector and the public sector; proposes that the cooperation programme should include selected industrial research activities through PPPs operating under a common umbrella;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 365 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b (new)
27b. Strongly urges that further progress be made towards the more balanced participation of men and women in the future framework programme; stresses that measures to promote female participation throughout the life cycle of projects should be stepped up; stresses, likewise, that the 40% target for female participation in the programme and advisory committees should continue to be implemented;
2011/06/21
Committee: ITRE