20 Amendments of Adam GIEREK related to 2011/0399(COD)
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) An EU databank should be established, in cooperation with national centres for the management of scientific research, covering the scientific disciplines and including the names of experts in those fields.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) In order to enhance transparency, the names of experts that havewill assisted the Commission or relevant funding bodies in the application of this Regulation should be publishedby evaluating proposed projects on the basis of an accepted assessment scale should be published. The evaluations should be made available to the coordinator of the research team. Where the publication of the name would endanger the security or integrity of the expert or would unduly prejudice his or her privacy, the Commission or funding bodies should be able to refrain from the publication of such names.
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
(17a) ‘Excellence’ is a quality assessment that refers to a research facility staffed by well trained research and scientific personnel and which ensures that the best practical solution is found to the research objective and that the maximum amount of new information is obtained at the minimum cost.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The proposals submitted shall be evaluated on the basis of the following award criteria such as the following:
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) excellence, on the basis of an evaluation of the research facilities in accordance with Article 2(1) point 17a (new);
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) impactthe research achievements of the team members;
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) quality and efficiency of the cost of implementation.
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
ca) likelihood of success.
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. The sole criterion of excellence shall apply in the selection of the research team for proposals for ERC frontier research actions, i.e., it shall be based on the evaluation of the researchers’ access to modern research facilities, in accordance with Article 2(1) point 17a (new).
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Proposals shall be ranked according to the evaluation results. The selection shall be made on the basis of this ranking on the basis of the proposed numerical assessment scale. The same topic (problem to be solved) or a similar one may be given independently to two different research teams in order to enhance competitiveness.
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 577 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission and, where appropriate, funding bodies may appoint independent experts to evaluate proposals or to advise on or assist withshall establish, on the basis of requests from the Member States, a database, in the form of a list, of independent scientific experts representing the scientific disciplines included in the relevant classification. Reviewers shall be selected from this list for:
Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) the evaluation of proposals;(Does not affect English version.)
Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) the monitoring of the implementation of actions carried out under Regulation (EU) No XX/XX [Horizon 2020] as well as of previous Research and/or Innovation Programmes;(Does not affect English version.)
Amendment 581 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point d
d) the evaluation of Research and Innovation Programmes;(Does not affect English version.)
Amendment 583 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point e
e) the designvelopment of the Union research and innovation policy including the preparation of future programmes.
Amendment 593 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. Independent experts shall be chosen from the list referred to in paragraph 1 on the basis of skills, experience and knowledge appropriate to carry out the tasks assigned to them. In cases where independent experts have to deal with classified information, the appropriate security clearance shall be required before appointment.
Amendment 594 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Independent experts shall be identified and selected on the basis of calls for applications from individuals and callthe scientific disciplines featured in the applications addressed to relevant organisations such as national research agencies, research institutions, standardisation organisations or enterprises with a view to establishing a database of candidates.
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 4
Article 37 – paragraph 4
4. The appointment of the experts shall take place by the end of 2013, at the latest, and may take the form of a framework appointment valid for the entire duration of Horizon 2020 with specific assignments of tasks comprising a preliminary assessment of the project, an assessment of its implementation, and a final assessment.
Amendment 616 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 5
Article 37 – paragraph 5
5. The names of experts appointed in a personal capacity,the independent experts – together with the scientific disciplines that they represent – who have assisted the Commission or the funding bodies in implementation of Regulation (EU) No XX/XX Horizon 2020 and Decision No XX/XX/EU [the specific programme], shall be published following their appointment in the period prior to the commencement of Horizon 2020, and the lists shall subsequently be updated at least once a year on the Internet site of the Commission or the funding body. The names of experts shall be collected, processed and published in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.