7 Amendments of Matteo SALVINI related to 2011/2025(INI)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the data protection dimension of the internal market to be enhanced through uniformisfull harmonization of Member States' legislation and increased legal certainty, with excessive restrictions and further organisational costs being avoided, and administrative burdens reduced, especially for SMEs;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the need for a coherent application of data protection rules, taking into account the impact of new technologies on individuals' rights, the transparency of procedures, while ensuring free circulation of personal data to facilitate the smooth functioning of the internal market;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need for awareness-raising activities on data protection to ensure that the rules on consent are implemented in a uniform way, especially in the online environment; emphasises the need to communicate clearly to data subjects level of adequacy of data protection in third countries;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for a revision and simplification of the current personal data breachprocessing notification system with a view to making data processing by all data controllers less cumbersome and expensive; emphasises the importance of an uniform system for notification of violations.
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to examine the modalities for access, rectification and deletion of data, as well as recourse to Alternative Dispute Resolution in the internal market; especially in the online environment; and, stresses the need for a proper infringement policy;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Encourages the development of an EU certification scheme in the field of privacy and data protection. It should be structured in a way that avoids unduly burdening companies – and particularly SMEs – with costly and bureaucratic obligations which could discourage participation. The scheme should be neutral to technology, capable of being recognised globally and affordable so as not to create barriers to entry;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls for a codification of Privacy by design that should not take the form of design mandates or technology preferences. Calls on the Commission to encourage technology providers to integrate core privacy principles, including data minimisation, transparency and user control, into the development and deployment of technologies;