BETA

5 Amendments of Sajjad KARIM related to 2012/2044(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the commitment shown by the Commission towards addressing problems identified by citizens and businesses affecting the Single Market, however expresses disappointment at the depth shown in the Working Paper;
2012/05/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses the need to address the problems experienced by citizens and businesses; notes that despite the minimal evidence included in the Working Paper, many of the problem areas identified have been subject to recent impact assessments and proposals by the Commission; strongly considers that where action is proposed the Commission must produce robust and conclusive evidence in favour of the policy option chosen in the draft legislation; calls on the Parliament to give full consideration to the accuracy and persuasiveness of the impact assessments produced by the Commission when considering draft proposals, in order that adopted legislation meets the needs of citizens and businesses alike;
2012/05/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
1 Legislative Resolution of the European Parliament of 14 February 2012 (2011/0038(COD)), P7_TA(2012)0033.4a. Endorses the commitment shown to addressing the issue of regulatory burdens; in this regard recalls the previous commitment of the Parliament to require the Commission to identify equivalent cost offsets when proposing new legislation; further recalls the Parliament's request that the programme for administrative burden reduction be extended and expanded, and therefore looks forward to proposals to reduce administrative burdens and regulatory nuisances which would address many of the citizens' and businesses' main concerns regarding the Single Market;
2012/05/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Considers that a strong adherence to the 'Think Small First' principle would ensure that future legislation does not introduce further difficulties and frustrations for citizens and businesses engaging in the Single Market;
2012/05/02
Committee: JURI
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Agrees with the Commission that differences in contract law do not represent one of the root causes of dissatisfaction with online shopping within Europe; calls therefore on an extensive examination of the necessity and utility of the proposal for a Common European Sales Law; considers that alternative proposals would provide citizens and businesses with the comfort needed to carry out business online, in particular proposals on ADR and ODR;
2012/05/02
Committee: JURI