3 Amendments of Dimitrios PAPADIMOULIS related to 2007/2264(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1
Paragraph -1
-1. Underlines the conclusion of the European Ombudsman that the failure of the Commission to deal with the petitioner's complaint within a reasonable period of time constitutes maladministration;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that this case is only one - and not the most serious - example of the systematic failure by various Member States to comply with the basic provisions of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time1, as can be seen from the Extended Impact Assessment (SEC(2004)1154) which the Commission produced before embarking on the planned review of the directive in question; reminds the Commission that further complaints have been addressed to the Ombudsman regarding other Member States' failure to comply with Directive 2003/88/EC;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that the Commission must take action, in particular as regards the issues addressed in the complaint (namely the time spent on call) in order to ensure that Member States fully comply with the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities that time spent on call at the workplace must be regarded as working time and that compensatory rest must be granted immediately after a combined period of normal duty and on- call time;