5 Amendments of Erna HENNICOT-SCHOEPGES related to 2006/0136(COD)
Amendment 246 #
Article 11 – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 1
2. The draft assessment report shall also include, where relevant, a proposal to set maximum residue levels. In such a case the rapporteur Member State shall forward the application, the evaluation report and the supporting dossier referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 to the Commission no later than six months after the date of the notification provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 9(3) of this Regulation.
Amendment 248 #
Article 12 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Where the conclusion of the Authority is adopted within the time limit set out in paragraph 2 of this Article, extended by any additional time period set in paragraph 3, the provisions of Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 shall not apply and the provisions of Article 14 of that Regulation shall apply without delay.
Amendment 249 #
Article 12 – paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Where the conclusion of the Authority is not adopted within the time limit set out in paragraph 2 of this Article, extended by any additional time period set in paragraph 3, the provisions of Articles 11 and 14 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 shall apply without delay.
Amendment 282 #
Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Plant protection products which do not comply with the condition referred to in subparagraph (a) but which do comply with the all the other conditions referred to in this paragraph shall be deemed to be identical to the reference product if a comparative assessment by a laboratory officially recognised in accordance with the Principles of Good Laboratory Practice, which assessment is submitted to the competent authority of the importing Member State by the applicant, or a comparative assessment by the competent authority, confirms that the plant protection product in respect of which an import permit is requested is, in substance, identical to the reference product and that the following requirements are met: (a) the requirements of subparagraph 1, points (b) and (c), (b) the plant protection product in respect of which an import permit is requested does not contain a co-formulant or a co- formulant substance which has not been assessed, (c) no co-formulant substances with essential functions are lacking, (d) the product does not feature different nominal concentrations of co-formulants with essential functions or co-formulant substances which are more toxic or ecotoxic than the reference product or are less favourable from the point of view of effectiveness or stability than those of the reference product, (e) no co-formulants are absent which serve to protect users or third parties.
Amendment 324 #
Annex II - point 3.8.2. a (new)
3.8.2a. An active substance, safener or synergist shall not be approved if the hazard quotients (HQ) for oral or contact exposure of honeybees resulting from direct or indirect exposure via spray drift or dust are greater than 50, unless it is established that under realistic proposed conditions of use: - the exposure of honeybees to that active substance in a plant protection product is negligible, - or if it is clearly established through an appropriate risk assessment that under field conditions there are no unacceptable effects on honeybee larvae, honeybee behaviour, or colony survival and development.