11 Amendments of Marian-Jean MARINESCU related to 2010/2154(INI)
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission regularly to reviseto revise regularly the list of authorised screening methods and the conditions for their implementation, in line with technological progress, in order to provide a high level of detection performance in keeping with that progress;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to draw up a set of common EU rules to ensure the adequate implementation of security measures;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Considers that the acceptance and certification of security scanners should only be given after a comprehensive study made by the responsible authorities;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that the use of security scanners must be basregulated onby common ruleEU standards that not only lay down detection performance but also impose the necessary safeguards to protect the health and fundamental rights of passengers and workers;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Considers that luggage scanners should also be subject to EU common standards, especially regarding the radiation limits, since they afterwards come in direct contact with people;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Takes the view that, even though 100% aviation security cannot be guaranteed, the detection performance of security scanners is higher than that offered by current metal detectors, particularly with regard to non- metallic objects and liquids, whilst frisking (full hand-search) causes more irritation and time loss and is more likely to be rejected than a scanner;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Considers that Member States should supplement control points and security staff in order to ensure that passengers are not affected by the instalment of security scanners;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Takes the view that the rules for the effective operation of security scanners must pay particular attention to vulnerable groups and to people who are frequently exposed to radiation especially when considering the maximum allowed radiation limit;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses that images should not be stored for longer than is necessary to ensure aviation security, that they should be destroyed once they are no longer necessary for the intended purposes, that they should only be seen by the operator and that they should not be used for purposes other than to detect prohibited objects;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Takes the view that people undergoing checks should receive all the necessary information in advance, particularly regarding the operation of the scanner concerned, its technical features, what images can be seen and by whom, the conditions in place to protect the rights to intimacy, privacy and data protection, possible health risks and the possibility of refusing to pass through the scanner, as well as alternative screening methods;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Asks the Commission to initiate the information process regarding security scanners based on a set of common rules meant to facilitate a better information campaign in the EU airports;