22 Amendments of Marian-Jean MARINESCU related to 2011/0398(COD)
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) A key objective of the common transport policy is sustainable development. This requires an integrated approach aimed at ensuring both the effective functioning and competitiveness of Union transport systems and the protection of the environment.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Sustainable development of air transport necessitates the introduction of measures aimed at reducing the noise nuisance from aircraft at airports with particular noise problems. A large number of EU citizens are exposed to high noise levels which may lead to negative health effects.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall designate a competent authoritiesy responsible for assessment of airport noise situation and for adopting measures including on operating restrictions, as well as an independent appeal body.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authoritiesy and the appeal body shall be independent of any organisation which could be affected by noise-related action.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The Member States shall notify the Commission of the names and addresses of the designated competent authoritiesy and appeal body referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall, when taking noise- related action, consider the following combination of available measures, with a view to determininge the most cost- effective combination of the following available measures:
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the foreseeable effect of a reduction of aircraft noise at sourceland-use planning and management;
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) land-use planning and managementthe foreseeable effect of a reduction of aircraft noise at source;
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Member States may, within the Balanced Approach, differentiate noise mitigating measures according to aircraft type, runway use and/or timeframe covered.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may, within the Balanced Approach, differentiate noise mitigating measures accordasures or a combination of measures taken in accordance with this Regulation for a given airport shall not be more restrictive than necessary to achieve the environmental noise abatement objectives set for that airport. In case the measures or a combination of measures will not determinge to aircraft type, runway use and/or timeframe coveredhe achievement of the environmental noise abatement objectives set for that airport the Member State shall determine a new combination of measures including operational restrictions.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Without prejudice to paragraph 32 subparagraph 2 a, operating restrictions which take the form of a withdrawal of marginally compliant aircraft from airport operations shall not affect civil subsonic aircraft that comply, through either original certification or recertification, with the noise standard in Volume 1, Part II, Chapter 4 of Annex 16 to the Chicago Convention.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The competent authorities shall assess the noise situation at airports in their territory on a regular basis, but not more than once every two years, in accordance with the requirements of Directive 2002/49/EC and national or local rules. The competent authorities may call on the support of the Performance Review Body referred to in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The competent authorities shall ensure that, at the appropriate level, a forum for technical cooperation is established between the airport operator, aircraft operator and air navigation service provider, for actions which these operators are responsible for, and taking due account of the interdependency between measures to mitigate noise and to reduce emissions. The members of this forum for technical cooperation shall regularly consult local administration, local residents or their representatives, and provide technical information and advice on noise mitigating measures to the competent authorities.
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – point a a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – point a a (new)
(aa) representatives of local administration
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The competent authorities may exempt marginally compliant aircraft registered in developing nations as defined, from noise operating restrictions provided that such aircraft:
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. At the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, and without prejudice to a pending appeal procedure, the Commission may scrutinise the decision on an operating restriction, prior to its implementation. Where the Commission finds that the decision does not respect the requirements set out in this Regulation, or is otherwise contrary to Union law, it may suspend the decision.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.4
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.4
Forecast noise contours – including an assessment of the number of people likely to be affected by aircraft noise – distinguish between established residential areas and, newly constructed residential areas and areas where building is planned.
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.4 a (new)
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.4 a (new)
2.4 a Completion of land-use plans taking in consideration the possible future increase of traffic and the airport development.
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – paragraph 2 – point 1
Annex 2 – paragraph 2 – point 1
1) Health and sSafety of local residents living in the surroundingsvicinity of the airport;