BETA

7 Amendments of Marian-Jean MARINESCU related to 2011/2206(DEC)

Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Encourages and expects a swift implementation of this decision;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Warns, however, that more clarity will be needed on the conditions for issuing confirmations of attendance, the rationale behind the allowance provided for in Article 12 and the reasons for reimbursement for taking part in; welcomes the removal of the article related to video -conferencesing allowances from the regulation; keenly awaits the results of the negotiations between the EESC and the Council on a definitive and satisfactory solution to all thesethe remaining issues, for which the decision depends on the Council;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Reconfirms its position that, in the interests of transparency, declarations of financial interests of members of all institutions should be accessible on the Internet; in that context, notes with satisfaction the decision by the EESC Bureau providing for publicationwelcomes the publication on the Internet, of the declarations of financial interests of its mEESC Members;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Suggests an enhanced compatibility of the priority budget lines of the two Committees; believes that this would in turn lead to an increase in savings and to additional reinforcement of the inter- institutional cooperation;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls for better financial planning and budgetary management in order to avoid similar situations in the future;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Deplores, with regard to the alleged irregularities uncovered in the 2009 discharge procedure, the fact that the EESC Secretary-General did not provide sufficient explanation in response to questions highlighting not only instances of bad administrative pracIs aware of the allegations and the ongoing investigations; regrets the considerable amount of ticme and the pressing need for internal procedures to be improved, but also, which is more serious, the recurring suspicions that interest in sound economic managementnecessary to conclude them and the repercussions of this delay ofn the institution and of the EU budget is being abandoned, in particular through the failure to resolve staff conflicts; notes that all these questions have led, inter alia, to allegations being submitted to the European Anti-Fraud Office (Parliament's decision- making process; urges the EESC to fully cooperate with OLAF), the European Ombudsman and the Court of Justice, not only by officials but also by members of the EESC of the European Union to ensure a rapid conclusion of these cases;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that OLAF, the Ombudsman and the Court of Justice are continuing to work on these allegations, which relate mainly, but not exclusively, to the following issues: – irregularities that cause financial damage to the Union, – irregularities in appointments of senior officials, in disciplinary proceedings, as well as the usurpation of the competences of the EESC Bureau, – violation of the independence of the legal service of the EESC, – violation of the obligation under Union law to inform OLAF, – violation of the duty of transparency, – infringement of Article 22a(3) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, which provides that officials shall not suffer any prejudicial effects from the institution as a result of having communicated information on irregularities, provided that they acted reasonably and honestly;deleted
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT