28 Amendments of Marian-Jean MARINESCU related to 2012/2005(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the completion of the SES couldwill lead to considerable economic and environmental savings through greater efficiencyby creating a more sustainable aviation area and a more effective air traffic management system at European level;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the European airspace is one of the busiest in the world with nearly 9 million commercial passengers in 2010 and over 750 million passengers using EU airports and expectations that these figures might double by 2030;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas on 4 December 2012 the implementation of functional airspace blocks should be completed but, the latest reports show, the situation is far from complying with this provision of the SES legislation;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas according to article 13.3 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010, four months after the reception of the performance plans from the Member States, the European Commission should issue recommendations concerning the adoption of revised performance targets for those not consistent with the EU-wide targets;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Warns that the increase in air traffic means that Europe’s airspace is fast approaching its maximum capacity and that this problem needs to be urgently addressed, in order to guarantee the quality of air transport services for the European public and ensure sustainable aviation in Europe;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Draws attention to the relative sense of urgency thaturgency of implementing the SES legislation be implemented successfully in order to avoid increased congestion with ever heavier traffic flows and outdated technologies;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls the need to make Europe's airspace as efficient as possible, not only for economic gains and for the benefit of air passengers but also because of environmental benefits;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that SESAR will result in flight times shortened by approximately 10%, 50% fewer flight cancellations and delays and a tenfold increase in safety, which will considerably improve passenger experience;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Requires the European Commission and the Member States to report back to the Transport and Tourism Committee of the European Parliament on the progress made with regards to the implementation of the SES legislation by June 2013; March 2013, including an evaluation of the consequences due to the delays in the implementation of the Functional Airspace Blocks;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Requires the European Commission to report back to the Transport and Tourism Committee on the progress made with the implementation of the performance scheme by all NSPs by December 2012;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Considers that if the measures to achieve the performance targets are not taken, the completion of the Single European Sky is endangered; delays in implementing the provisions of articles 9, 12 and 13 from Regulation (EU) No 691/2010 and in taking the necessary above mentioned measures would show clearly the lack of interest from the European Commission;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Remains extremely concerned that the creation of Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) across Europe are behind schedule and highlights the importance of political action to reach the objectives; urges the Member States accordingly to make every effort to step up cooperation and coordination between them;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Stresses that the failure to implement the Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) as foreseen in the SES II package will lead to the failure of creating the Single European Sky, as FABs are the mandatory preliminary stage to SES;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Asks the Commission to act in a preventive (prophylactic) way by sending warning letters to the Member States which didn't yet sign the agreements for the establishment of their FABs and thus endanger their timely completion;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)
Paragraph 19 c (new)
19c. Asks the Commission to swiftly propose a strategy to accelerate the implementation of the Functional Airspace Blocks and at the same time reinforce the implementation measures foreseen by the SES II legislative package;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 d (new)
Paragraph 19 d (new)
19d. Urges the Commission to initiate the appropriate measures including infringement procedures in case the deadline for the creation of the Functional Airspace Blocks is not met;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 e (new)
Paragraph 19 e (new)
19e. Considers that the most effective and most efficient way of creating a single European sky is by means of a top-down approach and therefore asks the Commission, based on the report mentioned in paragraph 12, to propose measures to eliminate the consequences due to the delay in the implementation of functional airspace blocks and to switch from the bottom-up to the top-down approach swiftly, in order to ensure that the objectives of the SES II legislative package are achieved;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 f (new)
Paragraph 19 f (new)
19f. Considers it is fundamental to achieve the full implementation of centralized models (e.g. Network Manager, SESAR Joint Undertaking, Deployment Manager) that support the operational stakeholders in their actions, which would contribute to an enhanced governance;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Asks that the lack of resources, especially with regards to the National Supervisory Authority, be addressed swiftly at national political level;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Insists that the Member States provide the required funding, needs to be agreed as soon as possible for the completion of the Single European Sky;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Subheading 3
SESAR Deployment Strategy
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Acknowledges that there has been substantial financial investment by industry and the European Union on Research and Development for the SESAR technology and it is now time to put in place the measures necessary to reap the benefits of that investment with the implementation of the SES legislation;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Emphasises that if the Single European Sky is not implemented, the deployment of the SESAR technology would be a waste of resources and of all the invested funds without bringing any benefits;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. Recalls the need for coordination between the schedule of the implementation of the Single European Sky and the development and deployment phase of SESAR as part of the SES as stated in Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Points out that the technologies have already been developed by the manufacturers and are currently available, which makes the successful implementation of the SESAR an achievable goal;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Considers that, in order to allow ANSPs and other stakeholders to best develop their strategic partnerships and receive incentives to achieve their objectives, the performance pillar needs to be further promoted;