6 Amendments of Marian-Jean MARINESCU related to 2014/2005(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the late communication of the MFF figures and the ceilings available for each policy area did not help individual rapporteurs with the development of a strategic approach to negotiations with the Council; urges the Commission to provide simultaneously to the Council and the Parliament all updated MFF figures in the future.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Deeply regrets the European Conclusions on MFF of 7/8 February 2013 including a figure for Heading 3 which was 16.6 % lower than the Commission proposal, and consequently the high amount of cuts of 23% on the Internal Security Fund;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets the fact that, in the area of home affairs, the Council – supported by the Commission – seemed more interested in using the funds to supplement Member States’ national budgets than to promote European added value and European solidarity; regrets not having obtained delegated acts for programming decisions in accordance with article 290 TFEU as these decisions clearly meet the conditions for delegated acts laid down in the Treaty;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Further notes, with respect to the home affairs funds, that the ordinary legislative procedure does not provide for the Commission and the Council to negotiate an agreed position between themselves, without involving Parliament, and then to present that position to the Parliament as a fait accompli; points out that if the Commission is unwilling to defend its initial proposal, it should present an amended proposal; insists that the Commission shall take up its role of honest broker in future inter-institutional negotiations;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Taking into consideration that the cuts were imposed to the Parliament without any reasoned justification, considers that the Parliament has to put emphasis, when it comes to consider the Mid-term review, on the particular areas where the cuts were the most significant;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Is of the opinion that, in the framework of the Mid-term review, the Parliament should use all its negotiation capacity through co-decision, without being imposed decisions and figures from the European Council;