6 Amendments of Marian-Jean MARINESCU related to 2015/2199(DEC)
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Grants the Executive Director of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2014 / Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2014;
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2014 / Postpones the closure of the accounts of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2014;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. As the Joint Undertaking merged with Eniac in June 2014, the discharge authority calls on ECSEL JTI not to perpetuate the above, to assCalls on the ECSEL Joint Undertaking, following the assessment of the procedures applied by the national authorities, to invite the national authoritiess the o procedures followed in order to avoid that the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions be put into question in the future, and to report to the discharge authority on the outcome of such an assessmentduce evidence that the implementation of the national procedures provides a reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of transactions;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the Court of Auditors' report includes a qualified opinion which is based on the lack of information necessary to calculate either a weighted error rate or a residual error rate following the ex post audits by NFAs; invites the Court of Auditors to collect additional and necessary documents and information, for which the Joint Undertaking is not empowered to require, from the national audit bodies of the Member States and/or the national competent departments, in accordance with Article 287(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; moreover, invites the Court of Auditors to use this additional information as an alternative way to justify its opinion and to report to the discharge authority on its assessment of these additional elements;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. AcknowledgesNotes with concern that the Joint Undertaking took no action regarding some internal control standards relating to information and financial reporting: in particular, evaluation of activities, assessment of the internal control systems and internal audit capability (IAC); observes that this was due to the upcoming merger; asks the ECSEL JTI to inform the discharge authority on the measures taken and the advancements attained in this aspect20 ; __________________ 20 ARTEMIS AAR - p. 29. ARTEMIS AAR - p. 29.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes with concern from the Court's report that the Joint Undertaking did not have in place a comprehensive written procedure to deal with conflicts of interest at the time of the audit; acknowledges from ECSEL JTI that its Governing Board adopted a comprehensive policy to prevent conflicts of interest;