Activities of Daciana Octavia SÂRBU related to 2013/0140(COD)
Plenary speeches (1)
Food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products (debate) RO
Amendments (14)
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
Recital 56
(56) The direct or indirect refund of fees collected by the competent authorities should be prohibited as it would put operators not benefitting from the refund at a disadvantage and potentially create distortions of competition. However, iIn order to provide support to micro- enterprises, these should be exempted from the payment of the fees collected in accordance with this Regulation. However, defining those enterprises by their annual income in euros would result in a much larger number of exemptions in some Member States and could place an additional financial burden on national authorities in the poorest Member States. Therefore, each Member State should determine the criteria for the exemption of micro- enterprises in its territory.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) have appropriate and properly maintained facilities and equipment meeting the requisite standards to ensure that staff can perform official controls and other official activities efficiently and effectively;
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) uniform specific requirements for inspections on pesticide application equipment used on a large scale and likely to affect human health and uniform minimum frequency of such controls;
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point e
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 34 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission and Member States shall draw up a set of procedures for the competent authorities to follow in response to an application from the operator for a second expert opinion.
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 64 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
As appropriate, any such consignment shall be isolated or quarantined and animals belonging to it shall be kept and treated under the supervision of a veterinarian and under appropriate conditions pending any further decision.
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82
Article 82
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 88 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) enable the identification of the person who signed them and the date of issue;
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 88 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 88 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) allow the easy verification of the link between the certificate, the issuing authority and the consignment, lot or individual animal or good covered by the certificate.
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 135 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 135 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) order the unloading, transfer to another means of transport, holding, treatment and care of animals under the supervision of a veterinarian, quarantine periods, the postponement of the slaughter of animals;
Amendment 526 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) is impartial and, independent, not directly nor indirectly employed by the operator on which it is performing control activities, and otherwise free from any conflict of interest as regards the exercise of the specific official control tasks delegated to it;
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – point a (new)
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – point a (new)
a) the independence or impartiality of the delegated body or natural person have been shown to be compromised
Amendment 817 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82 – paragraph 2
Article 82 – paragraph 2
2. EMicro enterprises employing fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million, as defined by each Member State, shall be exempted from the payment of the fees provided for in Article 77.