7 Amendments of Evgeni KIRILOV related to 2008/2100(INI)
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas economic, social and territorial cohesion can be enhanced by aligning both per-capita incomes and employment structures in rural and urban areas,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the establishment of the EAFRD and the separation of non- agricultural funding from the scope of cohesion policy and a broader regional development perspective may result in some objectives (e.g. environmental protection, transport and education) being either duplicated or omitted altogether,
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that rural development policy has a huge influence on economic, social and territorial cohesion and that due consideration should be given to whthe need to create synergies and the need for bethter it is justifiable to separate rural development measures from cohesion and regional development policoordination with cohesion and rural development policy mean that serious consideration should be given to the advantages and disadvantages of merging these policies in order to improve their coherence and efficiency;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that per-capita income levels and access to public goods and services remain the biggest challenges for territorial cohesion policy and can be most effectively improved through support for non- agricultural activities in rural communities;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that the difficulties in implementing rural development policy are the result of the separation of sectoral policies from territorial cohesion policy and the separation of the economic and social aspects of both policies, as well as the wide variety of responsibility allocation and policy coordination systems used in the Member States; in this connection, given the existing ambiguities in the legislation governing the eligibility of measures under EAFRD and under the Structural Funds, calls on the Commission to assist Member States in properly understanding the differences between these financial instruments and in appreciating possible synergies so that they can correctly absorb the funds allocated and help increase the added value of these policies;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Takes the view that, prior to rural funding reform, the Commission should conduct a detailed assessment of the CAP's impact on regional development in the context of territorial cohesion andcohesion policy and that a set of best practices should be drawn up for rural policy as a whole;