Activities of Filiz HYUSMENOVA related to 2011/2288(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on attractiveness of investing in Europe
Amendments (4)
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that in most European countries, although large firms generate a substantive part of the business sector value added, and insists that for geographically targeted support, the size of the enterprise should not matter as the only criterion should beSMEs represent the main driving force for economic growth, innovation, employment and social integration; believes that for geographically targeted support, the quality and required sustainability of the project should be the main criteria;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that in the world of global competition, an option of cohesion policy support provides added value for companies when deciding in which world region to develop their operation capacities and where to transfer their knowhow; points out that the provision of business support services, financial engineering and technology transfer, is an additional contribution to the attractiveness of investing in Europe;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that the EU has an enormous strength in its citieregions, and that major urban infrastructure projects, and innovative business parks, provide the strongest appeal for investment; urges the Member States to provide large-scale investments in infrastructure and, new technologyies and R&D in order to enhance the liveability and competitiveness of Europe's citieregions.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6a (new)
Paragraph 6a (new)
6a. Believes that investments in transport, energy, broadband infrastructure, as well as in developing human capital, are crucial for attracting more environmentally friendly growth- enhancing investments in order to achieve sustainable development in line with Europe 2020 objectives.