Activities of Daniel DALTON related to 2018/2855(RSP)
Plenary speeches (1)
The use of Facebook users’ data by Cambridge Analytica and the impact on data protection (debate)
Amendments (6)
Amendment 24 #
Recital X
X. whereas the Information Commissioner’s Office of the United Kingdom has already issued 23 Information Notices to 17 different organisations and individuals, including Facebook on 2 3 February 2018, to request provision of information from the organisations in a structured way; while Facebook confirmed on 18 May 2018 that Aggregate IQ created and, in some cases, placed advertisements on behalf of the DUP Vote to Leave campaign, Vote Leave, BeLeave and Veterans for Britain;
Amendment 36 #
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the digital age requires electoral laws to be adapted to this new digital reality and suggests Member States introduce an obligatory system of introduce an obligatory system of digital imprints for electronic campaigning and advertising. Any form of political advertising should include easily accessible and understandable information on the publishing organisation and who is legally responsible for spending so that it is clear who sponsored campaigns, similar to existing requirements for printed campaign materials currently in place in various Member Statesneeds appropriate electoral laws and suggests Member States to assess whether measures to enhance transparency such as digital imprints for electronic campaigning and political advertising are feasible;
Amendment 45 #
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that profiling for political and electoral purposes, as,Underlines that Regulation (EU) 2016/679 severely limits the conditions under which processing puersuant to EU data protection law, it refers toonal data revealing political opinions or philosophical opinions, should be prohibited and is of the opinion that social media platforms should monitor and activebeliefs is allowed; believes that public authorities in cooperation with social media platforms must strictly ienform authorities if such behaviour occursce this rule;
Amendment 67 #
Paragraph 17
17. Takes note of the privacy improvements that Facebook has undertaken after the Facebook/ Cambridge Analytica scandal, but recalls that Facebook promised to hold a full internal audit of which the European Parliament has not yet been informed and recommends that Facebook make substantial modifications that would also affect the core business model and the structure of its platformregarding the structure of its platform in order to fully comply with relevant EU legislation;
Amendment 85 #
Paragraph 24
24. Takes the view that data protection authorities should have the same, if not more technical expert knowledge as those organisations under scrutiny. Suggests this objective could be reached by introducing funding by a levy on the sector concerned and that the Member States must ensure appropriate levels of funding of their DPAs;
Amendment 94 #
Draft motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30