BETA

10 Amendments of Aldo PATRICIELLO related to 2014/2150(INI)

Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas in the past years the better regulation agenda has nevertheless contributed to improving legislative practices; whereas the large number of different names and programmes introduced by the Commission in the area, such as ‘better regulation’, ’better lawmaking’, ‘smart regulation’, ’regulatory fitness’, ‘Think Small First’, ’fitness checks’, ‘ABR+’, does not set a good example for achieving the clarity that citizens legitimately expect from the EU;(does not affect English version)
2015/05/27
Committee: JURI
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the Commission, in establishing its work programme for 2015, for the first time applied the so-called principle of political discontinuity as justification for withdrawing a huge number of pending legislative proposals;(does not affect English version)
2015/05/27
Committee: JURI
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that better regulation should encompass the ‘culture’ of public administration at all levels of the European Union, and include the implementation and application of Union acts at European level as well as at national, regional and local levels in order to ensure good administration and ‘Europe-friendly conduct’ at all levels;(does not affect English version)
2015/05/27
Committee: JURI
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that four members of the High Level Group of Independent Stakeholders have come out against several of the conclusions presented in the Group’s final report of on administrative burdens and produced a dissenconflicting opinion; expects the Commission to take into account the concerns of all stakeholders involved in the process;
2015/05/27
Committee: JURI
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that there should be stronger involvement on the part of regional and local authorities in EU policy making, in particular by involving Member State expertise and experience at regional and local levels at an early stage in the preparation of legislation; notes that the Committee of the Regions is an important mouthpiece for these levels of representat(does not affect English version;)
2015/05/27
Committee: JURI
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Is convinced that impact assessments constitute an important tool for supporting decision-making in all EU institutions and play a significant role in better regulation; remains, however, consciousaware of the fact that such assessments are not a substitute for political assessments and decisions;
2015/05/27
Committee: JURI
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. UrgesPoints out to Parliament’s specialist committees tohat they should make more consistent use of in-house impact assessment instruments, particularly where substantial changes to the original Commission proposal are being envisaged;
2015/05/27
Committee: JURI
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Notes that evaluation of new rules regarding their impact on SMEs must be in no way detrimental to the rights of their employees;(Does not affect the English version.)
2015/05/27
Committee: JURI
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the fact that the Commission is making ex-post analysis an integral part of better regulation; stresses that, in the interests of legal certainty for citizens and businesses, such analyses should be carried out within a sufficient time-frame, preferably several years after the deadline for transposition into national law;(Does not affect the English version.)
2015/05/27
Committee: JURI
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Remains strongly opposed, with reference to the decisions of the Parliament of 15 January 2015, to the intention of the Commission to withdraw a number of legislative proposals, in particular the directive on maternity leave, the legislative proposals on air quality and waste policy, the directive on transparency in pricing and reimbursement of medicines, and the proposal to revise the directive on national emission ceilings under the legislative follow-up to the climate and energy package; calls on the Commission to take due account of the position of Parliament;(Does not affect the English version.)
2015/05/27
Committee: JURI