6 Amendments of Adina VĂLEAN related to 2010/0275(COD)
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The representatives of the Member States, meeting in the European Council on 13 December 2003, decided that the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA), that was to be established on the basis of the proposal submitted by the Commission, would have its seat in a town in Greece to be determined by the Greek Government. The Greek Government determined that ENISA should have its seat in Heraklion, Crete. This arrangement raises serious questions on the efficiency and effectiveness of the Agency, the Council should therefore reconsider this decision taking into account these parameters.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) A set of tasks should indicate how the Agency is to accomplish its objectives while allowing flexibility in its operations. The tasks carried out by the Agency should include the collection of appropriate information and data needed to carry out analyses of the risks to the security and resilience of electronic communications, infrastructure and services and to assess, in cooperation with Member States, the state of network and information security in Europe. The Agency should ensure coordination with Member States and enhance cooperation between stakeholders in Europe, in particular by involving in its activities competent national bodies and private sector experts in the area of network and information security, in particular providers of electronic communications networks and services, network equipment manufacturers and software vendors. The Agency should provide assistance to the Commission and the Member States in their dialogue with industry to address security-related problems in hardware and software products, thereby contributing to a collaborative approach to network and information security.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) The Agency should be established for a n unlimited period. Its operations should be evaluated with regard to the effectiveness of achieving the objectives and of its working practices, in order to determine the continuing validity, or otherwise, of the objectives of the Agency and, based on this, whether the duration of its oper of time. A yearly performance agreement should be set between the Agency and the Commission, which should encompass a general evaluation report on the effectiveness and objectives achieved and which should be submitted each year to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors. In addition, a fully independent evaluations should be further extended,undertaken every three years.
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The seat shall be reconsidered by the Council taking into account the need to ensure efficient and effective running of the Agency.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. Within three years from the date of establishment referred to in Article 34, the Commission, taking into account the views of all relevant stakeholders, shall carry out an evaluation on the basis of terms of reference agreed with the Management Board. The evaluation shall assess the impact and the effectiveness of the Agency in achieving the objectives set out in Article 2, and the effectiveness of the Agency’s working practices. The Commission shall undertake the evaluation notably in order to determine whether anthe Agency is still an effective instrument and whether the duration of the Agency should be further extfulfilling its multi-annual work plan and assess whether the Agency needs to be strengthended beyond the period specified in Article 34or its mandated extended or adapted.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33
Article 33
The Agency shall be established from […] for an unlimited period of five yearstime.