10 Amendments of Søren Bo SØNDERGAARD related to 2011/2025(INI)
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas rapid technological developments have brought new challenges in terms of personal data protection as a result of the increased reliance on complex information technology tools for data processing as well as enhanced online activity, including e-commerce,
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the data protection dimension of the internal market to be enhanced both online and offline through the uniformisation of Member States'’ legislation and increased legal certainty, with excessive restrictions and further organisational costs being avoided, and, especially as regards definitions, grounds for and lawfulness of data processing, data subject rights, international transfers and national data protection authorities, to ensure increased legal certainty and reduce excessive administrative burdens reduced, especially for SMEs;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the need for a coherent application of data protection rules, taking into account the impact of new technologies on individuals'’ rights, while ensuring free circulation of personal data to facilitate the smooth functioning of both the internal market and the Internet and its characteristic openness and interconnectivity;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines the importance for any future legislation to be technologically- neutral to ensure that data subjects' rights are always valid and enforceable regardless of the technology used for processing personal data; calls upon industry, research and development and innovation sectors to incorporate the principle of privacy by design and to promote PETs (Privacy Enhancing Technologies) in order to guarantee a high level of protection of personal data throughout the Single Market;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Notes that the development and broader use of cloud computing raises new challenges in terms of privacy and protection of personal data; calls, therefore, for a clarification of the capacities of transparency on behalf of data controllers, data processors and hosts as to better allocate the corresponding legal responsibilities and so that the data subjects know where their data are stored, who has access to their data, who decides the use to which the personal data will be put, and what kind of back-up and recovery processes are in place;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Calls on the Commission to clarify the rules on applicable law in the Data Protection Directive 95/46, especially in situations where companies operate in several Member States or have branches outside the European Union;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need for awareness-raising activities on data protection to ensure that the rules on consent are implemented every individual knows his or her rights in terms of personal data protection and understands the short and long term consequences of providing certain types of data as well as the conditions attached to providing such data, including the different modalities of consent, data portability and the right to be forgotten. Awareness raising a uniform way, especially in the online environmentbout such information is not only relevant to online activity but also to employment relationships and intra or inter corporate transfers of personal employment data;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for a revision and simplificatn extension of the current personal data breach notification system with a view to making data processing by all data controllers less cumbersome and expensivebeyond the telecom sector to serious data breaches;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to examine the modalities for access, rectification and deletion of data, as well as recourse to Alternative Dispute Resolution and judicial collective redress in the internal market;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6