19 Amendments of Johan DANIELSSON related to 2013/0186(COD)
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) The cooperation between air traffic service providers is an important tool for improving the performance of the European ATM system and should be encouraged. The cooperation or integration between civil and military air traffic service should also be encouraged in order to improve safety, efficiency, and the performance of the European ATM system. Member States should be able to set up cooperation mechanisms not limited to predefined forms of cooperation and geographical areas.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) There should be no discrimination between airspace users as to the provision of equivalent air navigation services. This does not apply when different airspace users are treated differently on the basis of an amended performance and charging scheme, which allows for differentiation of charges based on the level of service.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) The performance and charging schemes are intended to make air navigation services provided under conditions other than market conditions more cost-efficient and to promote better service quality and should, to this end, include relevant and appropriate incentives. In view of this objective, the performance and charging schemes should not cover services supplied under market conditions.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) The performance of the network functions should be subject to criteria specific to them, having regard to the peculiar nature of these specific network functions. The network functions should be subject to performance targets in the key performance areas of safety, the environment, capacity, and cost-efficiency.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) In the cooperative decision making process for the decisions to be taken by the Network Manager, the interest of the network should prevail. Parties to the cooperative decision-making process should therefore act to the maximum extent possible with a view to improving the functioning and performance of the network but it should also take into consideration local safety concerns. The procedures for the cooperative decision- making process should promote safety as well as the interest of the network, and be such that issues are resolved and consensus found wherever possible. Decisions taken shall also be considered within the context of the National Performance Plans, and a mechanism created to ensure there is no detriment to an ANSP due to the cooperative decision making process.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) To enhance the customer focus of air traffic service providers and to increase the possibility of airspace users to influence decisions which affect them, the consultation and particip, the consultation of stakeholders in major operational decisions of the air traffic service providers should be made more effective.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) In order to take into account technical or operational developments, in particular by amending annexes, or by supplementing the provisions on network management, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission. The content and scope of each delegation is set out in detail in the relevant Articles. When adopting delegated acts under this Regulation, it is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level within the Expert Group on Human Dimension, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making33 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 33 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where this enables cost-efficiency gains to the benefit of airspace usersan improvement of the service performance without being detrimental to safety, air traffic service providers may decide to procure CNS, AIS, ADS or MET services under market conditions.
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where this enables cost-efficiency gains to the benefit of airspace usersan improvement of the service performance without being detrimental to safety, Member States shallmay allow airport operators to procure terminal air traffic services for aerodrome control under market conditions.
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
In addition, where this enables cost- efficiency gains to the benefit of airspace usersan improvement of the service performance without being detrimental to safety, Member States may allow airport operators or the national supervisory authority concerned to procure terminal air traffic services for approach control under market conditions.
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) key performance indicators for target setting in the key performance areas of safety, the environment, capacity and cost- efficiency;
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) they shall drive gradual, continuous improvements in respect of thensure adequate operational and economic performance of air navigation services;
Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. The draft performance plans for en route air navigation services referred to in paragraph 1 shall include relevant information provided by the Network Manager. Before adopting those draft plans, designated air traffic service providers shall consult airspace users’ representatives, ANSP staff representatives and, where relevant, military authorities, airport operators and airport coordinators. The designated air traffic service providers shall also submit those plans to the national competent authority responsible for their certification, which shall verify the compliance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 and the delegated and implementing acts adopted on the basis thereof.
Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The draft Network Performance Plan shall be drawn up after the setting of Union- wide performance targets and before the start of the reference period concerned. It shall contain specific performance targets in the key performance areas of thesafety, environment, capacity and cost-efficiency.
Amendment 754 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. At the request of one or more Member States, of a national supervisory authority or of the Commission, the Agency acting as PRB shall carry out an investigation into any allegation of non- compliance as referred to in paragraph 1. Where it has indications of such non- compliance, the Agency acting as PRB may initiate an investigation on its own initiative. It shall conclude the investigation within four months of receipt of a request, after having heard the Member State, the national supervisory authority concerned and the designated air traffic service provider concerned as well as staff representatives from this body. Without prejudice to Article 41(1), the Agency acting as PRB shall share the results of the investigation with the Member States concerned, the air traffic service providers concerned and the Commission.
Amendment 855 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 7
Article 27 – paragraph 7
7. The Network Manager shall take decisions through a cooperative decision- making process. Parties to the cooperative decision-making process shall act to the maximum extent possible with a view to improving the functioning and performance of the network. The cooperative decision-making process shall promote the interest of the network, while taking due consideration of the local safety concerns.
Amendment 903 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 4
Article 36 – paragraph 4
4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult the Expert Group on Human Dimension as well as experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 910 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 38 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Member States, acting in accordance with their national legislation, shall establish consultation mechanisms for appropriate involvement of stakeholders, including professional staff representative bodies, in the implementation of the single European sky.