8 Amendments of Catherine NERIS related to 2008/2056(INI)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas a directive may not be fully efficient, even though it has been quickly and properly transposed, in particular when its implementation generates situations of legal uncertainty which lead to complaints to the European Court of Justice and hamper the good functioning of the Internal Market,
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Holds the view that a strong, open and, competitive and regulated Internal Market acts as an essential part of Europe’s response to the challenges of globalisation by promoting the competitiveness of European industry and, reinforcinges incentives for foreign investments, and insures the consumers rights in Europe; the external dimension should therefore be taken into accountconsideration by the Commission when taking new Internal Market initiatives;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Members States to urgently address correct transposition and application of Internal Market directives through the use of existing guidelines and best practices; urges thestresses the need to focus on the directives already transposed by a majority of Member States, in order to reach a coherent legislation throughout the Union as soon as possible; urges for development of more accurate tools to address the deficiency;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recalls that the provisions of some already transposed directives generate situations of legal uncertainty which sometimes require the arbitration of the European Court of Justice and hamper the good functioning of the Internal Market; therefore calls on the Commission to review the nature of the indicators used to elaborate the Scoreboard, in order to include for example the number of disputes, which is an essential qualitative criteria;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to, through sector inquiries, Business Surveys, Consumer Surveys or other means, to evaluate the quality and coherence of implementation in the Member States in order to guarantee the correct functioning of legislation;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines the fact that late and incorrect implementation deprives citizenonsumers and undertakings of their rights, causes harm to the European economy and undermines confidence in the Internal Market; calls on the Commission to develop indicators measuring the costs incurred by citizens and industry as a result of late and incorrect transposition;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Highlights that implementation problems are often detected through the SOLVIT network; notes with concern that SOLVIT centres are often understaffed and that the average handling time of a case is more than 10 weeks; calls on the Member StatesCommission to ensure that SOLVIT centres are properly staffed and on the Member States and the Commission to improve administrative efficiency in order noticeably to shorten the handling time;