4 Amendments of Maria Eleni KOPPA related to 2010/0282(COD)
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) It is important in this connection that the Member StatesCommission determines the system of penaltiadministrative measures applicable in the event of non- compliance with the obligations stemming from this Decision, and that they ensure that those penalties are applied. The penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasivewhile the member states shall determine what penalties are applicable when national provisions enacted pursuant to this Decision are infringed. The member states ensure that those penalties and administrative measures are applied. In all cases, the administrative measures and the penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. When administrative measures or penalties are imposed, the right of appeal for the accused individual or entity should be guaranteed.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – title
Article 5 – title
Penalties and administrative measures
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall determine what administrative measures are applicable when the provisions of the present Decision are infringed by any of the PRS participants.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1 c (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 c (new)
The penalties and administrative measures shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Endangering the security of the system can lead to the lift of access authorisation. When penalties or administrative measures are imposed, the right of appeal for the accused individual or entity shall be guaranteed.