832 Amendments of Maria Eleni KOPPA
Amendment 10 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9
Citation 9
– having regard to the fact that accession negotiations with Turkey were opened on 3 October 2005 and that the opening of such negotiations is the starting point for a long- lasting and open-ended process based on compliance with fair and rigorous conditionalitys and the commitment to reform,
Amendment 12 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
Citation 10
– having regard to the fact that Turkey has committed itself to the fulfilment of the Copenhagen criteria, adequate and effective reforms, good neighbourly relations and progressive alignment with the EU; having regard to the fact that these efforts should be viewed as an opportunity for Turkey to continue its necessary process of modernisation,
Amendment 122 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. WelcomesCalls for the immediate implementation of the democratisation package presented by the Government on 30 September 2013 and calls on the Government to duly consult the opposition and relevant civil society organisations in the preparation of the implementing legislation and to continue with its reform efforts towards revision of the electoral system, including the lowering of the 10% threshold, and the adequate inclusion of all components of Turkish society; calls on the Government to ensure that the legislation on hate crimes offers protection for all citizens, including minorities and LGBTI;
Amendment 155 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Expresses concerns at the very limited coverage of the Gezi Park events by Turkish media and the dismissal of journalists who criticised the Government’s reactions to such events; recalls that freedom of expression and media pluralism are at the heart of European values and that an independent press is crucial to a democratic society; reiterates once again its concern at the fact that most media are owned by and concentrated in, large conglomerates with a wide range of business interests and points out to the worrying widespread phenomenon of self-censorship by media owners and journalists; expresses concern at the dismissal of journalists expressing anti-government views and at the penalties imposed on the owners of critical media ; expresses concern at the particularly high number of journalists currently in pre-trial detention and calls on Turkey’s judicial authorities to review and address these cases as soon as possible;
Amendment 156 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9α. Expresses its deep concern at developments in Turkey since 17 December; strongly underlines the need to ensure the independence and impartiality of investigations and corruption probes by the judiciary;
Amendment 160 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Observes that the unprecedented wave of protests also reflects the legitimate concerns of many Turkish citizens that the Government is aspiring to impose a single set of ethical values and religious beliefs upon Turkish society as a whole; reiterates that, in a democratic polity, governments must promote tolerance and ensure freedom of religion and belief for all citizens; calls on the Government to respect the plurality and richness of Turkish society;
Amendment 201 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14α. Stresses its serious concern regarding statements by Turkish Government officials calling for the conversion of the historic Byzantine Church of St Sophia, which functions as a museum, into an Islamic place of worship; notes that the church has been declared a protected UNESCO World Heritage Site.
Amendment 223 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Welcomes the expected speedy implementation of the statement of intent by the Turkish Government regarding the reopening of the Greek minority school on the island Gökceada ( Imbros ), which would be a positive step in preserving the bicultural character of the Turkish islands Gökceada ( Imbros ) and Bozcaada ( Tenedos ) in accordance with Resolution No. 1625 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe; notes, however, that further action is needed to address the problems faced by members of the Greek minority in relation to their property rights;
Amendment 252 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Government of Turkey to sign and ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which forms an integral part of the Community acquis, without further delay and recalls the full legitimacy of the Republic of Cyprus’s exclusive economic zone;
Amendment 285 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses the importance of a coherent and comprehensive security approach in the Eastern Mediterranean, and calls on Turkey to allow political dialogue between the EU and NATO by lifting its veto on EU-NATO cooperation including Cyprus, and calls, in parallel, on the Republic of Cyprus to lift its veto on Turkey’s participation in the European Defence Agency; welcomes the Republic of Cyprus’ intention to join NATO’s Partnership for Peace Programme, which can be a game changer and urges Turkey to adopt an equally constructive attitude;
Amendment 5 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
- whereas EP resolution adopted on 8 October 2013, on corruption in the public and private sectors: the impact on HR in third countries
Amendment 62 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the adoption of the EU Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World in 2012; commends the VP/HR for her presentation of theexpects a continuous commitment from the VP/HR, with regular reports to the European Parliament's plenary session in June 2013; calls for this practice to continue andP; calls for active and constructive discussions among EU institutions in preparing future reports;
Amendment 65 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Acknowledges the efforts made to list the various EU actions in the field of human rights and democracy support in the country reports, which provide a wealth of information about the work of the EU institutions around the world; regrets, nevertheless, that the country reports still seem to lack a systematic, clear and coherent framework that would allow for more rigorous analysis on the impact and efficiency of EU action; asks therefore for regular follow ups on the reports, which will establish a roadmap with clear benchmarks and an evaluation;
Amendment 85 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Commends the EU SR on the openness of the dialogue conducted with the European Parliament and civil society, thus establishing an important practice that should be continued and consolidated to ensure due transparency and accountability; welcomes, furthermore, the attention given by the EU SR to a number of countries of concern, including Russia, Egypt and Bahrain;
Amendment 99 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Reminds the fact that corruption in public and private sectors perpetuates and aggravates inequalities and discrimination when it comes to equal enjoyment of civil, political, economic or social and cultural rights and underlines that it is proven that acts of corruption and human rights violations involve the misuse of power, lack of accountability and various forms of discrimination; requests the highest level of accountability and transparency of external aid and public budgets when it comes to EU budget and external aid.
Amendment 123 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Points out that Parliament may withhold its consent to international agreements on account of serious breaches of human rights, as, for example, in the cases of the conclusion of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with Turkmenistan or the textile protocol of the EU-Uzbekistan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement;
Amendment 124 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls upon the EU and the Member States to make sure that European companies respect human rights standards when operating outside the EU, especially in countries that do not have the infrastructure to enforce such standards; recalls the EU that the promotion of Corporate Social Responsibility is at the core of its external policies;
Amendment 148 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Considers the EU's external financial instruments an important tool for promoting and defending EU values abroad, as well as for supporting human rights defenders; welcomes in this context the commitment to put human rights, democracy and the rule of law at the core of EU external action; calls for improvements in the coherence and effectiveness of different thematic and geographic instruments in order to achieve this strategic objective;
Amendment 151 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Strongly encourages the EU to support an active and independent civil society worldwide with a special focus on human rights defenders, both politically and financially, through, for example, the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR);
Amendment 154 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. WelcomUrges the establishment of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) which aims toto engage in provideing support for those striving for democratic change by offering them flexible funding tailored to their needs, as foreseen in the provisions of its statute;
Amendment 176 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Notes that media freedom has generally advanced in enlargement countries; deplores, however, the lack of measures to ensure freedom of expression in certain enlargement countries, which often leads to self-censorship, political interference, economic pressures, and the harassment of, or evenand the use of violence against, journalists; is seriously concerned in this respect about increasing violations of the freedom of expression in Turkey;
Amendment 178 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Recognises the challenges related to democratic transitions in the Southern and Eastern Neighbourhood; notes increasing divergence in democratic reforms across the EU neighbourhood; reiterates the importance of civil society and human rights organizations in the process of democratic transition;
Amendment 201 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Remains concerned about the lack of democracy, rule of law, fundamental freedoms and respect for human rights in Belarusthe countries of the Eastern Neighbourhood;
Amendment 206 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
Paragraph 41
Amendment 210 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
Paragraph 41 a (new)
Amendment 211 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 b (new)
Paragraph 41 b (new)
41b. Calls for an immediate end to all acts of violence, sexual assault and other forms of degrading treatment against female protesters and women's rights activists; for serious and impartial investigations into all such cases and for full accountability for those responsible;
Amendment 219 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Remains deeply concerned about the crisis in Syria; strongly deplorefurther aggravating violent crisis in Syria and condemns in the strongest terms the excessive use of force and violence against the civilian population in the country, andincluding the use of chemical weapons that cannot be justified under any circumstances; abhors the scale of state abuses that may constitute crimes against humanity; calls on all armed factions to put an immediate end to violence in the country; expresses grave concern at the on- going humanitarian crisis and the implications for neighbouring countries; believes that the key to solving the conflict lies in political mechanisms and diplomatic processesstresses again that humanitarian assistance to those in need of basic goods and services in Syria and its neighbours must be an immediate priority for the international community and the European Union; believes that the key to solving the conflict lies in political mechanisms and diplomatic processes; welcomes the recent resolution of the Security Council of the United Nations and the Secretary General's proposal for a new peace conference to be held in November 2013 in Geneva;
Amendment 223 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
Paragraph 43
43. Considers accountability for past violations to be an integral element in the process of building sustainable reconciliation; calls for war criminals to be brought before the ICC; requests further collaboration from the Member States; welcomes the intention of the EEAS to develop a dedicated policy on transitional justice to help societies deal with past abuses and fight impunity; stresses the need to deal with transitional justice in a manner that is consistent with the EU's support for international criminal justice in general, and the ICC in particular; draws particular attention to the EU's experience in the Western Balkans as a source of inspiration;
Amendment 229 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
Paragraph 46
46. Condemns in the strongest terms serious human rights violations perpetrated in armed conflict situations in recent and on-going crises, such as Egypt, Syria, Mali and the Central African Republic, and in particular summary executions, rape and other forms of sexual violence, acts of torture, arbitrary arrests and detentions; calls on the EU to fight against impunity in all of these cases, and to support action by domestic judiciaries as well as the ICC to bring the perpetrators to justice;
Amendment 230 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
Paragraph 47
47. Calls on the VP/HR and the EEAS to conduct a thorough policy review of the tragic events in Syria, Libya and Mali and other recent conflicts in order to revise the EU Guidelines on International Humanitarian Law (IHL), and to seek more effective implementation of those guidelines; calls on the EU to support the on-going initiative of the International Committee of the Red Cross and the Swiss government to reform the current international governance framework regarding IHL; supports the EU to engage towards a reform of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), in order to be able to respond effectively to contemporary crises;
Amendment 238 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49 a (new)
Paragraph 49 a (new)
49a. Condemns in absolute terms, the military use of drones and the practice of targeted killings, as a major violation of human rights and reiterates the need for a ceasing of such activities; acknowledges however that the number of such incidents in countries like Yemen and Pakistan has been reduced significantly;
Amendment 245 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50
Paragraph 50
50. Expresses its serious concerns about recent repressive laws and their arbitrary enforcement by the Russian authorities, often leading to the harassment of NGOs, civil society activists, human rights defenders and minorities, with a particular call for attention towards the LGBTI community;
Amendment 279 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58 a (new)
Paragraph 58 a (new)
58a. Expresses its serious and continuous concerns regarding Internet censorship and the extent this phenomenon has taken in various countries; emphasises the important role of online media regarding the function and efficiency of civil society and human rights organizations, not only as an instrument of information but also of expression, especially in repressive regimes; calls upon the Commission and the EEAS to further mainstream digital freedom and recognize it as a human right.
Amendment 280 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 59
Paragraph 59
59. Supports fully the affirmative position taken by the EU in the Strategic Framework on Human Rights and Democracy regarding the promotion and protection of all human rights, as well as the pledge to ‘speak out against any attempt to undermine respect for universality of human rights’; reiterates its full support for the indivisibility and universality of human rights;
Amendment 294 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 67
Paragraph 67
67. Calls on the EU delegations and EU Special Representatives to actively promote the ICC, the enforcement of its decisions, and the fight against impunity for Rome Statute crimes; suggests, furthermore, the strengthening of the financial support provided to the ICC;
Amendment 300 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69
Paragraph 69
69. Reiterates its univocal opposition to capital punishment, and considers the global abolition of the death penalty as a central objective of the EU's policy on human rights; emphasises that the death penalty has never been proved to be an effective deterrent to crime; applauds the efforts of the European Union and its Member States in the United Nations that led to the adoption of the General Assembly resolution regarding the moratorium on the use of death penalty in December 2012; welcomes the decision of Pakistan to extend the moratorium on the death penalty;
Amendment 308 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 71
Paragraph 71
71. Recalls the articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights stating that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights and are entitled to the rights and freedoms therein without distinction of any kind, including race, colour, sex, language, religion, social origin, birth, disabilities or other status; reiterates its call for the EU to combat discrimination and intolerance as a key part of its human rights policy, and to base this policy on an inclusive and comprehensive definition of non-discrimination; emphasises that respect for the rights of minorities is a crucial element for peace, development and democracy; welcomes and further encourages EU engagement with the United Nations and regional organisations in this cause;
Amendment 333 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 75 a (new)
Paragraph 75 a (new)
75a. Expresses its serious concerns regarding the issue of rape; condemns the extended use of rape as a weapon of war, especially in the Great Lakes region; deplores the tremendously high degree of impunity towards rape in countries like India and Pakistan;
Amendment 335 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 75 b (new)
Paragraph 75 b (new)
75b. Calls upon the EU to further protect reproductive rights and stresses the need to place these policies in the centre of development cooperation with third countries; strongly condemns the disgraceful practice of female genital mutilation in certain parts of Africa, honour killings, gender based abortion and forced marriage; reminds the important conclusions reached in the Cairo conference(ICPD);
Amendment 336 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 75 c (new)
Paragraph 75 c (new)
75c. Supports the "Education First" initiative of the UN Secretary General, as access to education increases protection against threats to girls' future: early marriage and pregnancy, HIV protection, poverty, domestic and sexual violence and also reduces child and maternal mortality;
Amendment 342 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 77 a (new)
Paragraph 77 a (new)
77a. Strongly opposes the issue of child soldiers; requests that the Commission and the EEAS elaborate on how to proceed with their disarmament; stresses the importance of their rehabilitation and reintegration, in the general context of placing children's rights at the heart of EU external policy;
Amendment 343 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 77 b (new)
Paragraph 77 b (new)
77b. Calls upon the EU to pay attention to the growing issue of child witchcraft allegations in various countries, mainly in Sub-Saharan Africa, which leads to devastating consequences for the accused children; stresses the need for a systematic and collective investigation of the problem, which is characterized by a lack of concrete data, both on specific incidents as well as on the reasons which lead to these types of child abuse; requests placing the issue on the agenda of the human rights dialogues held with concerned countries;
Amendment 346 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 79
Paragraph 79
79. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the European External Action Service, to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the candidate countries, to the EUSR on human rights, to the United Nations and the Council of Europe, and to the governments of the countries and territories referred to in this resolution.
Amendment 1 #
2013/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the Inter- Parliamentary Conference for the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the Common Security Defence Policy conclusions of 6 September 2013,
Amendment 3 #
2013/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13
Citation 13
– having regard to its resolutions of 12 September 2013, on the maritime dimension of the Common Security and Defence Policy3 and on EU's military structures: state of play and future prospects4 to its resolution of 22 November 2012 on the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy35 , on the EU's mutual defence and solidarity clauses: political and operational dimensions46 , on the role of the Common Security and Defence Policy in case of climate-driven crises and natural disasters57 , and on Cyber Security and Defence68 , as well as those of 14 December 2011 on the impact of the financial crisis on the defence sector in the EU Member States79 , of 11 May 2011 on the development of the common security and defence policy following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty810 and of 23 November 2010 on civilian-military cooperation and the development of civilian-military capabilities9 11, __________________ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Text adopted, P7_TA(2012)0455. Text adopted, P7_TA(2013)0380. 4 Text adopted, P7_TA(2012)0456. Text adopted, P7_TA(2013)0381. 5 Text adopted, P7_TA(2012)0458. Text adopted, P7_TA(2012)0455. 6 Text adopted, P7_TA(2012)0457. Text adopted, P7_TA(2012)0456. 7 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0574. Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0458. 8 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0228. Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0457. 9 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0419. Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0574. 10 Text adopted, P7_TA(2011)0228. 11 Text adopted, P7_TA(2010)0419.
Amendment 62 #
2013/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Proposes the inclusion of human rights and gender advisors in all CSDP missions and encourages exchange of best practices among CSDP missions for the full taking into account of human rights concerns and for the full protection and inclusion of women in conflict and post conflict resolution,
Amendment 102 #
2013/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls for stronger cooperation between the EU and NATO structures through a complementary approach; is convinced that strengthening the CSDP does no harm to, and indeed reinforces, collective security and transatlantic links; asserts that the development of defence capabilities within an EU context also benefits NATO; notes the constructive collaboration regarding the EU's pooling&sharing initiative and NATO's smart defence initiative; considers that coordination and cooperation between the EU and NATO structures remains unsatisfactory due to the implications of the unresolved Cyprus issues; hopes that thewelcomes Republic of Cyprus's intention to join NATO's Partnership for Peace Programme which can be a game changer and urges Turkey to adopt an equally constructive attitude; urges the development of a comprehensive framework for EU-NATO cooperation and the deepening of political dialogue with full respect for the decision-making of each party;
Amendment 137 #
2013/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39a. Underlines that strengthening the technological and industrial base of the defence sector is an objective of the Union enshrined in the articles 42(3) and 45 TEU; Stresses that a solid European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) which is able to sustain CSDP, to further enhance Europe's military capabilities, whilst preserving the EU's strategic autonomy is crucial for an effective European defence; highlights, furthermore, the link between research, industry and capability development, which are all necessary elements for economic growth, job creation and competitiveness, as well as for a stronger CSDP;
Amendment 147 #
2013/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
Paragraph 46
46. Expresses its high hopes that this European Council will not be an isolated event, but the starting point of a continuous process that revisits security and defence matters at European Council level on a regular basis; favours, as a follow-up to the European Council, the establishment of a roadmap with benchmarks and a reporting mechanism; advocates the creation of a Council of Defence Ministers inand the medium termappointment of a defence deputy to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs & Security Policy, in order to give security and defence matters the weight they deserve;
Amendment 149 #
2013/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 a (new)
Paragraph 46 a (new)
46a. Invites European Parliament to maintain and strengthen closer links with the Member States' national parliaments through regular meetings in order to promote dialogue and exchange of views on matters of security and defence
Amendment 150 #
2013/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 b (new)
Paragraph 46 b (new)
46b. believes that the CSDP is a basic pillar of the European integration process;
Amendment 45 #
2013/2081(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Deplores the fact that the EU has not yet developed a clear strategy for itsramework for its external relations with the world and that its activities are defined more by reaction than by action; demands, therefore, a fundamental strategic debate, which should include the Council, the Commission and Parliament;
Amendment 51 #
2013/2081(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses, therefore, that a comprehensive understanding of the CFSP covers all areas of foreign policy, including the progressive framing of the CSDP, with an emphasis on pursuing coherence and consistency while respecting the specificity of each component of external action; believes that there should be closer coordination, under the VP/HR's leadership, of EU internal policies and Member States' policy choices in key areas such as transport and energy, environment and communication , where these have clearly transnational implications;
Amendment 62 #
2013/2081(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Questions, in view of the range of challenges and demands for EU engagement in the world, the Council's rationale for cutting the multiannual financial framework, which will reduce the Union's capacity to promote peace, security and economic development and its credibility in respect of such efforts; cautions that if such cuts are applied in an uncoordinated fashion, they risk undermining the effective pursuit of our values as well as our collective ability to promote security, stability and prosperity in our neighbourhood and further afield; foresees it will complicate the decision making process and it will lead to delays;
Amendment 91 #
2013/2081(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26 a. whereas the partnership with USA is based on strong political, cultural, economic and historical links, on shared values such as freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, and on common goals, such as prosperity, social progress and inclusiveness, sustainable development, and the peaceful resolution of conflicts
Amendment 97 #
2013/2081(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27 a. welcomes the fact that the Middle East peace process has again become a main priority; welcomes President Obama's commitment to a two-state solution; calls on the US side to push for a freeze on settlement construction and to work together with the EU to strengthen the direct Israeli-Palestinian negotiations;
Amendment 3 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
Citation 3
– having regard to its previous resolutions, in particular of 9 March 2011 on Turkey's 2010 progress report1 , of 29 March 2012 on Turkey's 2011 progress report2 , and of 22 May 2012 on a 2020 perspective for women in Turkey3 , as well to its resolution of 22 November 2012 on Enlargement: policies, criteria and the EU's strategic interests4 , __________________ 4 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0453
Amendment 92 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2a (new)
Paragraph 2a (new)
2a. Deeply regrets Turkey's decision to abstain from meetings and contacts with the Presidency of the European Union during the second half of 2012; recalls that the Presidency of the Council of the European Union is provided for in the Treaty on European Union and that Turkey, as a candidate country, must commit to serene relations with the European Union and all its Member States; notes with disappointment that the Turkish insistence not to accept a representative of the Cypriot Presidency has led to the cancellation of the 70th EU- Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee;
Amendment 104 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Council decision to invite the Commission to take steps towards visa liberalisation as a gradual and long term perspective, in parallel with the signature of the readmission agreement; urges Turkey to sign and implement the readmission agreement without further delay and to ensure that, until all the provisions of this agreement enters into force, existing bilateral agreements are fully implemented; recalls that Turkey is one of the key transit countries for illegal migration to the EU and underlines the need to intensify cooperation with the EU on migration management, the fight against human trafficking and border controls; stresses once again the importance of facilitating access to the EU for business people, academics, students and representatives of civil society from Turkey; supports the efforts of the Commission and the Member States to implement the visa code, harmonise and simplify visa requirements and create visa facilitating centres in Turkey; Reminds the Member States of their commitments under the association agreement in line with the Soysal Ruling of the European Court of Justice of 19 February 2009;
Amendment 153 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8a (new)
Paragraph 8a (new)
8a. Underlines the importance of providing effective protection for human- rights defenders; expresses concern about continuing court cases against human- rights defenders and their continued prosecution; in this respect, draws particular attention to the trial of the writer, sociologist and feminist Pinar Selek, which has lasted almost 15 years and, despite three acquittal decisions, resulted in a life sentence pronounced on 24 January 2013; strongly condemns this decision, pointing out that the long duration of the court case raises questions as regards the right to liberty and security, as well as the right to a fair trial, enshrined respectively in Articles 5 and 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights;
Amendment 255 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18a (new)
Paragraph 18a (new)
18a. Reiterates its expectation for the implementation of the declaration of the Government of Turkey to reopen a Greek minority school on the island of Gökçeada (Imbros), which constitutes a positive step towards the preservation of the bicultural character of the Turkish islands of Gökçeada (Imbros) and Bozcaada (Tenedos), in line with Resolution 1625 (2008) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe; notes, however, that further steps are needed in order to address the problems encountered by members of the Greek minority, particularly with regard to their property rights;
Amendment 287 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Deeply regrets Turkey's decision to abstain from meetings and contacts with the Cypriot Presidency of the Council of the EU and tTakes the view that Turkey missed an important opportunity to start a process of engagement and normalisation of relations with Cyprus, with the occasion of its Presidency of the Council of the European Union; recalls that the EU is based on the principles of sincere cooperation and mutual solidarity amongst all its Member States and respect for the institutional framework; stresses that progress towards the normalisation of Turkey's relations with the Republic of Cyprus is urgently needed in order to provide new momentum to the EU- Turkey accession negotiations;
Amendment 355 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25a (new)
Paragraph 25a (new)
25a. Takes note of the continuing intensified efforts by Turkey and Greece to improve their bilateral relations, including through bilateral meetings; considers it regrettable, however, that the casus belli threat declared by the Turkish Grand National Assembly against Greece has not yet been withdrawn; reiterates that Turkey needs to commit itself unequivocally to good neighbourly relations and to the peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance with the United Nations Charter, having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice; urges the Government of Turkey to end the repeated violation of Greek airspace and Turkish military aircraft flights over Greek islands;
Amendment 361 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25b (new)
Paragraph 25b (new)
25b. Emphasises that the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) has been signed by the EU, the 27 Member States and all other candidate countries and that it is part of the acquis communautaire; calls, therefore, on the Government of Turkey to sign and ratify it without further delay; recalls the full legitimacy of the Republic of Cyprus' exclusive economic zone, in accordance with UNCLOS;
Amendment 53 #
2012/2711(RSP)
Paragraph 11, first indent
- Concrete and wide-ranging commitments from the Japanese government on NTBs with a view to eliminating a substantial percentage ofll barriers hindering EU-Japan trade; underlines that these commitments should go considerably further than the roadmaps already agreed under the scoping exercise;
Amendment 56 #
2012/2711(RSP)
Paragraph 11, first indent c (new)
- Removal of the existing NTB in the automotive sector included in the scoping paper such as the "zoning regulations" and the preferential treatment for "kei cars" to allow foreign competition on this segment;
Amendment 58 #
2012/2711(RSP)
Paragraph 11, second indent
- Significant concessions on public procurement guaranteeing market access for European companies in strategic Japanese sectors including railways and urban transport and to the same degree of openness as that of the EU's public procurement markets;
Amendment 59 #
Amendment 61 #
2012/2711(RSP)
Paragraph 11, third indent
- A strict, binding and effective dispute resolution mechanism to combat the development of new NTBs and obstacles to market access in public procurement in Japan after the entry into force of the agreement;
Amendment 64 #
2012/2711(RSP)
Paragraph 11, fourth indent
- A staggered schedule for sensitive tariff reductions in the EU to allow EU industry time to adapt to increased competition; considers that the removal of such tariffs should be inextricably linked via a 'safety clause' to the progress in removing obstacles to market access in public procurement and NTBs in Japan;
Amendment 78 #
2012/2711(RSP)
Paragraph 11, eighth indent d (new)
- A robust sustainable development chapter with binding core labour standards, including the four ILO priority conventions for industrialised countries, and environmental standards; this chapter should also include the setting up of a civil society forum that monitors and comments on its implementation;
Amendment 4 #
2012/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6
Citation 6
– having regard to the Charter of the United Nations and to United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of 10 December 1982,
Amendment 14 #
2012/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas the maritime boundaries of the Member States form the external borders of the European Union;
Amendment 30 #
2012/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas the EU and all its Member States are contracting parties of UNCLOS, thus the Convention constitutes part of the acquis communautaire;
Amendment 48 #
2012/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Underlines that the UNCLOS provides the legal framework for all types of activities carried out in the oceans and seas and that it can serve as a guide for the peaceful resolution of maritime disputes; calls, therefore, on the EU and its Member States to promote the universality of the Convention and to insist on the need of uniform and consistent implementation of its provisions;
Amendment 92 #
2012/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Notes that the recent discoveries of natural gas in the eastern Mediterranean have led Turkey, Russia and Israel to endeavour to increase their naval strength in the Mediterranean, causing direct concern for EU Members Greece and Cyprusincreased significantly the potential for disputes, affecting directly the legitimate interests and sovereign rights of the EU Member States, Greece and Cyprus; expresses concern that competition has already started to heat up and that Turkey, Russia, the US and Israel have increased their naval strength in the Mediterranean; further notes the implications of the unresolved dispute with Turkey in the Aegean and the escalation of tension resulting from the intended exploitation of Cyprus offshore oil reserves; urges the EU, therefore, to act in asserting its position in order to avoid conflict over natural resources in the Mediterranean and consequential security threats for EU Member States in the area, which could ultimately affect the EU as a whole;
Amendment 20 #
2012/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas Common Position 2008/944/CFSP is a legally binding framework laying down eight criteria, and whereas that, if they are not met, an export licence should be denied (criteria 1-4) or consideration should at least be given to doing so (criteria 5-8); whereas, however, the member states maintain the final control on all aspects of arms export licensing and the implementation of the Common Position is not subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU;
Amendment 52 #
2012/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
Recital O a (new)
Oa. Whereas developing nations continue to be the primary focus of foreign arms sales activity by weapons suppliers; whereas, during the period 2004-2011, the value of arms transfer agreements with developing nations comprised two-thirds of all such agreements worldwide; whereas irresponsible arms transfers and arms-related debt are undermining the chance for many developing countries to achieve the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) targets;
Amendment 60 #
2012/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital R a (new)
Recital R a (new)
Ra. whereas the international arms trade is considered by Transparency International to be one of the three most corrupt businesses in the world;
Amendment 79 #
2012/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that, operating through non- transparent processes, arms purchases have contributed significantly to the over- indebtedness of some countries, including a number of Member States; insists, therefore, that there should be greater transparency with respect to the purchase and sale of arms and that information on the intra-Community arms trade should continue to be included in the EU annual report;
Amendment 149 #
2012/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Urges the member states and other negotiating parties to favour robustness with regard to the content and membership of the future treaty, as opposed to favouring a weak treaty with universal consensus;
Amendment 156 #
2012/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the EUN Member States to adoptwork for the adoption of additional binding criteria, as international standards at the UN and the EU level, for guiding arms export decision-makers and, in the process, to take account of, in particular, the destination country's situation as regards human rights, the impact on the country's socio-economic development and the preservation of regional peace and security;
Amendment 160 #
2012/2303(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Highlights the importance of transparency and accountability mechanisms in the effective implementation of any international agreement on arms control; calls, therefore, for the inclusion of mechanisms for exchange of information and best practices between States Parties on arms exports, imports and transfer decisions in addition to strong and clear provisions for public annual reporting by the States Parties on all arms transfer decisions, including information on types, amounts and recipients of equipment authorised for transfer and on the implementation of the full scope and provisions of the treaty;
Amendment 23 #
2012/2287(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas in a global, complex and increasingly multipolar world, the EU and the US, in spite of fiscal consolidation, should play key roles in the world's politics and economy and in the shaping of the international environment, and face together regional conflicts and global challenges on a multilateral basis; whereas, to that end, they should also secure the involvement of new key powers, including the EU's two Latin American strategic partners, Brazil and Mexico, and Canada;
Amendment 30 #
2012/2287(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas Latin America is a region which shares with the EU and the US many values, interests, history and increasing economic ties; whereas Latin American countries have established a large number of regional or sub-regional organisations; whereas it is useful to study possible fields in which some sort of triangular cooperation could be developed; whereas that cooperation cshould be extended to include the African countries of the Atlantic Basin;
Amendment 130 #
2012/2287(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Highlights the importance of diversifying energy suppliers and transportation routes; stresses the growing relevance of the Atlantic Basin in energy production, which offers considerable diversification opportunities; suggests that the EU-US Energy Council, together with other countries of the Atlantic Basin, should study the possibility of working together on energy security and, sustainability and environmental matters;
Amendment 150 #
2012/2287(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the EU and the US to adopt a common strategy in international fora, especially the UN, on the reduction of weapons of mass destruction and conventional arms and to involve the Atlantic countries in these endeavours; expects the US and Russia to make further progress on nuclear disarmament and to work together with the EU for a solution to the Iranian and North Korean nuclear issues;
Amendment 166 #
2012/2287(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Urges the US administration to make the stalling Middle East peace process a priority and to ensure that direct negotiations are resumed without delay; urges the two partners to continue withto insist on the need to halt the construction of new Israeli settlements that will render unattainable the objective of a two state solution; stresses the need for the EU and the US to work together, on the basis of the double-track approach and to find, as a matter of urgency, for a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear programme issue and to actively support the efforts for the establishment of a Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction;
Amendment 3 #
2012/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
- having regard to the Charter of the United Nations, and in particular to the provisions of chapter VII and article 51;
Amendment 10 #
2012/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the progressive framing of a common defence policy, that aims to a common defence, is reinforcing the European identity and the strategic autonomy of the EU; whereas, at the same time, a stronger and more capable European defence is essential for consolidating the transatlantic link, in the context of structural geostrategic changes, accelerated by the global economic crisis, and in particular at a time of ongoing US strategic repositioning towards Asia- Pacific;
Amendment 24 #
2012/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Urges the Member States, the Commission and the Vice-President/High Representative to make full use of the potential of all relevant Treaty provisions, and in particular the mutual defence clause and the solidarity clause, in order to provide Europeans with a strong insurance policy against serious security risks, based on the principle of mutual solidarity among EU member states, as well as increased cost-efficiency and a fair burden sharing and division of costs;
Amendment 32 #
2012/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Reaffirms that use of force by the EU or its Member States is only admissible if legally justified on the basis of the United Nations Charter; in this context, stresses the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence; reiterates its attachment to respect for the Oslo Guidelines on the use of foreign military and civil defence assets in disaster relief; emphasises that prevention of conflicts, attacks and disasters is preferable to dealing with their consequences;
Amendment 49 #
2012/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Takes the view that even non-armed attacks, for instance cyber-attacks, launched with the aim of causing severe damage and disruption to a Member State and identified as coming from an external entity, could qualify for being covered by the clause, if the Member State's security is significantly threatened by its consequences, with full respect for the principle of proportionality;
Amendment 63 #
2012/2223(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Invites the Vice-President/High Representative to propose practical arrangements and guidelines for ensuring an effective response in the event that a Member State triggers the mutual defence clause, as well as an analysis of the role of the EU institutions, should the clause be triggered; takes the view that the obligation to provide aid and assistance, expressing political solidarity among Member States, should ensure a rapid decision in the Council in support of the Member State under attack; considers that consultations in line with the requirement of Article 32 TEU would serve this purpose, without prejudice for the right of every Member State to provide for its self-defence in the meantime;
Amendment 11 #
2012/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 34 #
2012/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that trade and foreign investment must be better used to stimulate smart, strong, sustainable, balanced, inclusive and resource-efficient growth, leading to higher job creation and increasingcontributing to the welfare of peoples across the world; welcomes the commitment of the G8 and G20 leaders to open trade and investment, expand markets and resist protectionism in all its forms, which are necessary conditions for sustained global economic recovery, jobs and development;·
Amendment 36 #
2012/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the ongoing joint discussion between the EU and the US on how to work collectively to increase growth potential and foster financial stability in order to create high quality jobs; underlines that in order to ensure long-term prosperity and employment, a joint commitment, and effort, is needed to create new opportunities for businesses both large and small, to promote entrepreneurship and to capitalise on the advantages offered by the uniquely integrated transatlantic market;
Amendment 76 #
2012/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Supports the view that given the low average tariffs, the key to unlocking the potential of the transatlantic relationship lies in the tackling of non-tariff barriers (NTBs), consisting mainly of customs procedures and behind-the-border regulatory restrictions; supports the ambition proposed by the HLWG to move progressively towards an even more integrated transatlantic marketplace, while recognising that no agreement could resolve all existing regulatory issues immediately and while fully respecting the right of each side to regulate in a manner that ensures the protection of health, product safety and environmental safety at the level that each side deems appropriate;·
Amendment 114 #
2012/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. takes the view, however, that due to the persistent deadlock with regard to the original architecture and objectives of the DDA, the debate on how to reform and strengthen the WTO, with a view to making it more democratic and effective, and on how to prepare it for the upcoming challenges, must be resumed as soon as possible;
Amendment 2 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation -1 (new)
Citation -1 (new)
- having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to the European Convention on Human Rights, and to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
Amendment 70 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the mandate of the thematic EU Special Representative (EUSR) on Human Rights and the planned creation of a Brussels-based Council Working Party on Human Rights (COHOM); looks forward to their close co-operation with Parliament, in the first case also in line with the provisions of article 36 TEU;
Amendment 135 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Welcomes the EU's efforts in the field of IHL andinclusion, for the first time, of a dedicated section on IHL in the 2011 Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy and the EU's efforts to ensure accountability by documenting any abuses of IHL and supporting accountability mechanisms, as well as its pledges to combat enforced disappearances, continue support for the ICC, work towards further participation in the principal IHL instruments, promote respect for fundamental procedural guarantees for all persons detained in armed conflict, and support international instruments seeking to address humanitarian hazards of explosive remnants of war, cluster munitions, improvised explosive devices and anti- personnel landmines;
Amendment 144 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Reiterates its commitment to the principle of the ‘'Responsibility to Protect’' (R2P), stressing the importance of external actors, including the EU,that the international community, including the EU, assumes responsibility for addressing gross human rights violations in third countries when the governments of these countries are unable or unwilling to protect their own citizens; stresses the importance of engaging in R2P actionsat this action of the international community implies humanitarian intervention and appropriate diplomatic pressure and only as last resort collective use of force, under the auspices or authorisation of the UN whenever possibleSecurity Council;
Amendment 150 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Commends, in this context, the actions of several EU Member States which took the lead in preventing further violence against civilians in Libya during the course of 2011, but regrets the lack of a concerted response at EU levelat no action was possible in the case of Syria; expresses its severe concern over the situation in this country and urges the UN Security Council to take necessary steps to end the massacre of civilians and to refer the responsible for violence in Syria to the ICC;
Amendment 215 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Welcomes EU efforts to include a human rights and democracy clause in all EU political framework agreements, but reiterates its call for all contractual relationships with third countries – both industrialised and developing, and including sectoral agreements, trade and technical or financial aid agreements – to include clearly worded clauses on human rights and democracy, without exception; warns that the lack of consistency in the implementation of the Human Rights clause can undermine the credibility and effectiveness of the EU's conditionality policy;
Amendment 380 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 82 a (new)
Paragraph 82 a (new)
82a. Welcomes the Joint statement by the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, OIC Secretary General, Arab League Secretary General, and African Union Commissioner for Peace and Security of 20 September 2012 that reaffirmed the respect for all religions and the fundamental importance of religious freedom and tolerance, while at the same time fully recognizing the importance of freedom of expression; condemns any advocacy of religious hatred and violence and deeply regrets the loss of human lives as result of the recent attacks on diplomatic missions; expresses condolences to families of victims;
Amendment 3 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to the Charter of the United Nations,
Amendment 20 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the CSDP has the potential to contribute to peace and stability in the world through its missions and operations that form part of the EU's comprehensive approach to a country or region, including through multilateral cooperation in international organizations - in particular the United Nations - and regional organizations, in compliance with the UN Charter and fully recognizing the primary responsibility of the United Nations Security Council in matters of international peace and security,
Amendment 35 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is concerned about the prospect of strategic decline facing the EU, not only through the downward trend in defence budgets, but also because of the relative and progressive marginalisation of its crisis management instruments, in particular the military ones; believes that the Union must seek to not delegate its security to others; and be able to contribute meaningfully to peacekeeping through international crisis management operations around the globe;
Amendment 59 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. EmphasizeReminds that the CSDP is intended to intervene in crises, including in context of high-intensity conflicts, with high political visibility andcontribute to peace-keeping and the strengthening of international security and emphasizes the need for the EU action to be ambitious enough to have a real impact on the ground;
Amendment 65 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Regrets, however, that with the exception of EUTM Somalia, no new military operations have been launched since 2008, even though a number of crises could have warranted EU intervention, including in Libya and Mali; encourages, in this context, the intensification of ongoing planning for possible military operations and, at the same time, calls for a revaluation of the on-going missions with the view to eventually abolish those that became obsolete;
Amendment 67 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls and welcomes the political and symbolic importance of the EU engagement in the Western Balkans, which remainshas contributed to peace and security in the region; reminds, however, that this region continues to face a number of challenges that represent a credibility test for the Union; calls on the High Representative / Vice-President of the Commission and the Council to reassess the EU's security contribution in the region; Western Balkans, with particular focus on the strengthening of rule of law, the protection of minority communities and the fight against organized crime and corruption;
Amendment 72 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the positive role played by the EULEX Kosovo mission, which is operating in a difficultextension of the mandate of the EU rule of law mission, EULEX Kosovo, for another two years, until 14 June 2014; highlights its polsitical environment, to help this countryve role in establishing the rule of law and a judicial, police and customs apparatus free from all political interference, in line with internationally recognized, as well as and European, best practices; recogniz and standards; takes note of the reconfiguration and downsize of the mission, considering them as a clear sign of the progress achieved so far; stresses, however, that much remains to be done if EULEX is to fully accomplish the missions assigned to it and enjoy the full confidence of the population, especially the Kosovo Serb community; calls on the mission to answer with the greatest care and rigour the questions raised by the Council of Europe report on the veracity of allegations of organ trafficking and to implement, with the States concerned, a witness protection programme so that rigorous judicial proceedings can establish the facts;
Amendment 77 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 138 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50
Paragraph 50
50. Notes that Europe is currently facing significant financial constrains and that the EU Member States, for financial, budgetary and political reasons alike, both related and unrelated to the eurozone crisis, are undergoing a phase of reducing or, at best, merely maintaining their levels of defence spending and notes that this situation is having a negative long-term; highlights the potential negative impact onf the credibilityse measures ofn the European Union and its Member States as major players on the international scene, not only in respect of a traditional ally such as the United States, but also vis-à-vis emergir military capabilities and, therefore, on the ability of the EU to effectively take over its responsibilities in peace - keeping, countries such as China, Brazil or Russianflict prevention and the strengthening of international security;
Amendment 153 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 62
Paragraph 62
62. Notewarns that the financial and budgetary crisis facing the European Union and its Member States willcan lead to loss of expertise unless a major programme is launched at European level on a bilateral or multilateral basis, and may also lead to the disappearance of a highly specialized industrial fabricand may also lead to the disappearance of a highly specialized industrial fabric; highly recommends, therefore, European synergies and advocates the promotion of a major European programme that will be open to all Member States for participation;
Amendment 181 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 80
Paragraph 80
80. Notes that the European Union and NATO, which are organizations of a different nature united by a strategic partnership whichthat was reaffirmed at the Chicago summit, are both active in a number of theatres such as Kosovo, Afghanistan and the fight against piracy in the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean; recalls in this context the importance of good cooperation between the EU and NATO;
Amendment 194 #
2012/2138(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 86 a (new)
Paragraph 86 a (new)
86a. EU/OSCE underlines the importance of the co- operation between the EU and the OSCE in regions of common interest and on issues, such as conflict prevention, crisis management, post-conflict rehabilitation, as well as promotion and strengthening of the rule of law; expresses satisfaction that the scope of this co-operation has broadened and deepened during the last years but calls for closer coordination and synergy in addressing crises and conflicts, avoiding duplication of efforts and developing cost-efficient approaches;
Amendment 22 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Α
Recital Α
Α. whereas the EU-China strategic partnership is of great importance for relations between the EU and China, and this relationship is paramount for finding answers to global concerns, such as the economic crisis, global security, nuclear non-proliferation, security of energy supplies and climate change;
Amendment 24 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Α a (new)
Recital Α a (new)
Αa. whereas a real partnership must be based on shared values;
Amendment 161 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges the popular legitimacy of the CCP, especially in view of its successful economic policy, but shares the criticism of independent Chinese scholars and observers that this legitimacy is seriously threatened by a ‘red aristocracy’ of close family members of former and present party leaders who possess enormous fortunes owing to their political and economic connections, a very grave situation which was recently laid bare by the Bo Xilai affair;
Amendment 184 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Takes seriously into account the vigorous protests by workers at the Foxconn plant and demands that workers' rights be respected; supports the pursuit of decent pay and decent working conditions;
Amendment 212 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Expresses its concern at the unwillingness of the Chinese government to ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which is still pending;
Amendment 238 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recognises the enormous efforts made by the Chinese Government to develop Tibet and Xinjiang economically; urges the Chinese Government to act in a politically responsible way by respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, respecting and protecting Tibetan and Uighur traditional cultures and lifestyles; believes that Beijing cannot win the hearts and minds of the Tibetan and Uighur peoples by way of millions of surveillance cameras or repressive police methods;
Amendment 291 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the global importance of the South China Sea, through which one-third of the world’s trade passes, is alarmed at the escalating tension and therefore urgently appeals to all involved parties to settle their conflicting territorial claims in the South China Sea by international arbitration and to refrain from unilateral political and military actions;
Amendment 314 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Believes that very serious consideration should be given to the economic, social and environmental impact of increasing investment by China in developing countries;
Amendment 66 #
2012/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Highlights the value of civilian- military synergies in crises such as those of Haiti, Pakistan and New Orleans; takes the view that these synergies proved how military forces can provide a valuable contribution to climate-driven crises and natural disasters by providing direct and timely assistance to the stricken areas and populations;
Amendment 92 #
2012/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – point a (new)
Paragraph 16 – point a (new)
(a) calls on EDA and the Member States' armed forces to develop green and energy-conscious technologies, exploiting fully the potential offered by renewable energy sources;
Amendment 1 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
– having regard to Articles 2, 3, 6, 21, 31, 33 and 36 of the Treaty of the European Union (TEU),
Amendment 2 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
Amendment 7 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) in order to strengthen the transparency and accountability of the mandate of the EUSR, an exchange of views/hearing with the EUSR for HR nominated by the High Representative should take place before the European Parliament (in an in camera meeting of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and of the Subcommittee on Human Rights) prior to his/her appointment by the Council;
Amendment 9 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
Paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the policy objectives of the EUSR for HR should include enhancing the coherence, effectiveness and visibility of EU action in the protection and promotion of human rights and democracy; the EUSR HR should work in close cooperation with the COHOM; the EUSR for HR should be a high-level interlocutor for its counterparts in third countries and at international organisations, also able to engage with the UN (UNGA, UNHRC, etc.) as well as relevant regional organisations; the EUSR for HR should chair high-level human rights dialogues and lead the consultations with third countries on human rights issues;
Amendment 13 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) in order to achieve these objectives, the EUSR, while acting under the authority of the High Representative, should be granted a strong, independent and flexible mandate not defined by narrow and specific thematic responsibilities but rather allowing the EUSR to act swiftly and effectively; in line with the actions and priorities set out in the Action Plan, the EUSR for HR should also address different horizontal issues contributing to more effective and coherent action in EU external policies; the scope of the EUSR's mandate should be fully in line with the principles of universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and to the policy objectives laid down in Article 21 of TEU and should cover, inter alia, strengthening democracy and institution building, international justice, international humanitarian law, abolition of the death penalty, human rights defenders, freedom of religion or belief, freedom of expression, child protection, gender issues, persons with disabilities, as well as, women's rights, women, - peace and security, LGBT rights and persons with disabilities;
Amendment 16 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) the mandate should be based on the principles guiding the EU's HR policy and, in particular, on EU guidelines on the death penalty (2008); torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (2008); human rights dialogues with third countries (2009); children and armed conflict (2008); human rights defenders (2008); promotion and protection of the rights of the child (2008); violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them (2008); international humanitarian law (2009), LGBT toolkit (2010) as well as the EU's annual reports on human rights in the world;
Amendment 17 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) the mandate should be based on the principles guiding the EU's HR policy and, in particular, on EU guidelines on the death penalty (2008); torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (2008); human rights dialogues with third countries (2009); children and armed conflict (2008); human rights defenders (2008); promotion and protection of the rights of the child (2008); violence against women and girls and combating all forms of discrimination against them (2008); international humanitarian law (2009), as well as the EU's annual reports on human rights in the world. Moreover, the mandate should include supporting the High Representative and the EU Institutions in the promotion of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, in light of their agreement in 2011 and the priority given to them in the European Commission Cummnication on Corporate Social Responsibility (COM(2011) 681 final);
Amendment 19 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
Paragraph 1 – point h
(h) the EUSR for HR should be appointed for 2-2.5 years i. In order to ensure continuity. The mandate should be renewable once, coherence and democratic accountability, the mandate should be renewable and the European Parliament should be properly and timely consulted during the renewal process;
Amendment 20 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
Paragraph 1 – point h
(h) the EUSR for HR should be appointed for 2-2.5 years in order to ensure continuity. The mandate should be renewable once;
Amendment 23 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i
Paragraph 1 – point i
(i) the EUSR for HR should work closely together with and under the authority of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to ensure coherence and mainstreaming of human rights across all policy areas in the work of all EU institutions; the EUSR should interact closely with the EEAS HR and Democracy Directorate and all the multilateral EU Delegations (New York, Geneva, Vienna, Strasbourg as well as with all EU delegations in the World) in order to facilitate contacts on human rights issues with all EU services, EU delegations in third countries and with international organisations; the EEAS HR and Democracy Directorate should provide all necessary services and facilitate the implementation of the EUSR mandate;
Amendment 25 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
Paragraph 1 – point j
(j) while maintaining close links with the Council's Political and Security Committee, the EUSR for HR should regularly report to the European Parliament, in a joint meeting of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Subcommittee on Human Rights, on the situation of human rights in the world and the state of play of the implementation of the mandate, including Human Rights Country strategies and the results of the UNHRC and UNGA sessions and human rights dialogues with third countries;
Amendment 28 #
2012/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point l
Paragraph 1 – point l
(l) the EUSR for HR should be provided with sufficientadequate financial and human resources in order to guarantee the effective work of the Special Representative and his/her team; the budget of the EUSR for HR should be reviewed annually;
Amendment 3 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)
Citation 5 b (new)
- having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 25 October 2011 entitled 'A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility' (COM(2011) 681),
Amendment 7 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations "Protect, Respect and Remedy" Framework, adopted by the UN Human Rights Council on 16 June 2011,
Amendment 42 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Expresses Parliament's wish, as the only directly elected EU institution, to be closely associated with this reshaped policy framework, and its determination to continue to play its full rolekey role in improving the democratic legitimacy of EU policy- making, while respecting the role of each institution in accordance with the Treaty; reiterates its will to intensify interinstitutional cooperation, including in the framework of the contact group entrusted with the follow-up to the review and the action plan; insists on the need for all institutions to combine their efforts in this process and calls, therefore, for a joint declaration committing them to common founding principles and objectives;
Amendment 94 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Reminds that European and Multinational companies also have responsibilities and obligations and welcomes the reaffirmation of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) by the EU; urges all enterprises to meet their corporate responsibility to respect human rights in line with the UN Guiding Principles; welcomes the readiness of the Commission to develop human rights guidance for small and medium-sized enterprises; calls on the Member States to develop their own national plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles and to insist on the need that also partner countries adhere to internationally-recognised CSR standards, such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the ILO Tri-Partite Declaration of principles concerning multinational enterprises and social policy;
Amendment 33 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls its Treaty prerogative to be consulted in the CFSP and CSDP spheres, to have its views duly taken into account and to make recommendations; recognises in this regard the availability of the HR/VP to the European Parliament; notes, however, that a solution needs to be found whereby the European Parliament is appropriately informed in the lead up to, and on the final outcome of, the Foreign Affairs Council; looks forward to the review of the external assistance instruments and to an outcome that recognises the European Parliament's rights over strategy papers and multiannual action plans, as established in Article 290 of the TFEU; calls, furthermore, for improved provision of information at all stages of the procedure for CFSP Council Decisions on agreements with third countries, includingespecially before deciding to mandate the European Commission to negotiate and sign on behalf of the Union agreements and when it comes to frameworks for the participation of third countries in EU crisis management operations;
Amendment 40 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that in the second decade of the twenty-first century there is a growing awareness amongst Europe's citizens, and further afield, that only comprehensive approaches that integrate diplomatic, economic and, in the last resort and in full compliance with the provisions of the UN charter, military means are adequate for addressing global threats and challenges;
Amendment 45 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that a comprehensive understanding of CFSP covers all areas of foreign policy, including the progressive framing of a Common Security and Defence Policy that might lead to a common defence, with an emphasis on pursuing coherence and consistency whilst respecting the specificity of each component of external action; reiterates that such an approach to developing EU foreign policy must be based on the principles and objectives established in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, meaning that the EU external action must be inspired by the promotion and protection of EU values, such as the respect for human rights, freedom, democracy and the rule of law; stresses, at the same time, the importance of closer coordination between the internal and external dimensions of the EU's security policies, which should be reflected also to the external action of the Union;
Amendment 46 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Stresses that Enlargement is one of the EU's most successful policies and a powerful foreign policy tool that helped to overcome the divisions of the Cold War and contributed to peace, stability and prosperity throughout Europe; highlights its transformative power and underlines the need to continue to be a credible policy of the EU, more adequately reflected and framed in CFSP;
Amendment 56 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recognises the essential role of the EEAS (including its Delegations and EU Special Representatives) in assisting the HR/VP in pursuing a more strategic, coherent and consistent political approach to the Union's external action; affirms its intention to continue monitoring the geographic and gender balance of staff in the EEAS, including in senior positions, and to assess whether the appointment of Member State diplomats as Heads of Delegation and other key positions is in the interests of the Union, not ofsolely of their Member States; stresses the importance of having a fully functional and efficient EEAS and of strengthening relations between the EEAS, the Commission and the Member States with a view to achieving synergies in the effective implementation of external action and in delivering a single EU message on key political issues;
Amendment 63 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Welcomes the decision for the appointment of a EU special representative for Human Rights that should have a substantial mandate to mainstream human rights across CFSP and CSDP and other EU policies and provide visibility and coherence to the EU action in this field;
Amendment 70 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the HR/VP to come forward with proposals to further encourage Member State cooperation under the CFSP, specifically by setting out a process that will lead to European Council conclusions inter alia on the implementation of the mutual defence clause, on Permanent Structured Cooperation in the area of security and defence and guidelines for more systematicthe use of coalitions of the willing, such as in the ‘core group’ concept for CSDP missions and operations, as a means of overcoming the limits of the ‘battlegroup’ concept, based on the principle of solidarity between Member States;
Amendment 92 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Believes, therefore, that future decisions on strategic partners should be carefully framed in accordance with the foreign policy priorities of the Union vis- à-vis a country or region, or in international fora, and that due consideration should be given to ending partnerships that become obsolete or counter-productive; callsCalls, therefore, for a follow-up debate with the European Parliament on the September 2010 European Council discussion on the strategic partnerships and for Parliament to be regularly informed ahead of decisions on future partnerships, particularly where such partnerships receive financial support from the Union budget or entail a closer contractual relationship with the EU;
Amendment 96 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Takes the view that, in order for the Union to be effective in delivering peace, security and socio-economic development to citizens in a highly competitive, changing and unpredictable international political order, it is important to focus the Union's limited resources on strategic priorities, starting from the challenges closer to home, particularly in the enlargement countries, the neighbourhood, and extending outwards in concentric circles, including where relevant the role and relative influence of regional organisations;
Amendment 100 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Believes that respecting the commitments in the framework of enlargement and demonstrating responsibility for our neighbourhood will strengthen the credibility of the Union's global reach; reconsiders that this will requirefirms the EU's commitment to effective multilateralism, with the United Nations at its core, and stresses the importance of working with other international partners in responding to international crises, threats and challenges, including in response to crises;
Amendment 1 #
2012/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
Citation 3
– having regard to its recommendation of 8 June 2011 to the Council on the 66th Session of the UNGA, as well as to its resolution of 11 May 2011 on the EU as a global actor: its role in multilateral organisations1, __________________ 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA- PROV(2011)0229.
Amendment 48 #
2012/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
Paragraph 1 – point j
(j) to reconfirm its commitment to ensuring that UN financial resources are adequate and managed efficiently and effectively, according to the principles of budgetary discipline and coherence and in conformity with the highest international standards;
Amendment 49 #
2012/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point -k a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point -k a (new)
(-k a) to strengthen the operational partnership and promote the strategic coherence and effectiveness of the collective peace-building efforts, inter alia through the work of the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Operations;
Amendment 52 #
2012/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point k
Paragraph 1 – point k
(k) to advance cooperation and build partnerships in the area of conflict prevention and, civilian and military crisis management, and conflict resolution with the UN, the OSCE, the African Union (AU), the Arab League and other international and regional organisations, as well as with civil society; to improve regional organisations‘' peace- building capacities, inter alia through the proposed EU–UN–AU and EU–UN– ECOWAS tri- partnerships;
Amendment 56 #
2012/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point l
Paragraph 1 – point l
(l) to promote the collaboration of different actors in the peace-building architecture, notably between the UN Secretariat, the UNSC, the UNGA, and the UN member states involved in peace-building missions; to pursue efforts to ensure that EU Member States contribute to UN peace missions with special capacities, such as transport and logistics, and training; to consider the option of launching a military operation under CSDP including the possible deployment of a battlegroup to precede a UN peace mission if requested by the UN; to support the development of conflict management capacity at national and subnational levels; to promote the exchange of know-how and good practices among partners;
Amendment 59 #
2012/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m
Paragraph 1 – point m
(m) to provide support to the UN Civilian Capacity Review in identifying practical ways of matching demand with supply in critical civilian capability areas; to expedite recruitment, eliminate operational incompatibilities, and avoid overlapping when deploying civilian CSDP capabilities in support of UN actions; to explore options for the joint deployment of crisis response teams within a UN operation in cases where rapidly deployable capacities are required;
Amendment 65 #
2012/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
(n a) to insist on the need to further strengthen the UN capability to protect civilians in armed conflicts;
Amendment 68 #
2012/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p
Paragraph 1 – point p
(p) to declare readiness to assist states in fulfilling their responsibilities towards protecting their populations, but at the same time to strongly reconfirm the commitment of the EU to the concept of the Responsibility to Protect, as agreed at the 2005 UN World Summit; to stress the need for timely and adequate international action to prevent and halt genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes and crimes against humanity and to highlight the role of the ICC in fighting impunity;
Amendment 71 #
2012/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point q
Paragraph 1 – point q
(q) to generate further progress on R2P in UN organs, particularly in the UNSC, the UNGA and the UNHRC, drawing conclusions and taking lessons both from the intervention in Libya and the inability of swift action in the case of Syria; to facilitate the debate on how the UN bodies, in particular the UNSC, could utilise this concept to ensure greater cooperation between UN member states in case of crisis; to advance the positive role of regional organisations, including the Arab League, in developing and applying an operational approach to R2P;
Amendment 100 #
2012/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point ab
Paragraph 1 – point ab
(ab) to focus on social and economic inclusion, democratic transition and political/electoral processes, capacity- building, the strengthening of civil society, the participation of young people in parliamentary democracy and the improvement of women's rights, including in terms of their participation in public and political life;
Amendment 1 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
– having regard to the European Security Strategy and to the paper of 14 March 2008 from the High Representative and the Commission to the European Council entitled "Climate change and international security",
Amendment 5 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6
Citation 6
– having regard to the Council conclusions on the Horn of Africa of 14 November 2011, and, in particular, to the Strategic Framework in the Annex thereof,
Amendment 8 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
– having regard to the Council conclusions on Common Security and Defence Policy of 1 December 2011 and 23 July 2012,
Amendment 13 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital -A (new)
Recital -A (new)
-A. whereas the Horn of Africa is one of the most food-insecure regions in the world and millions of people that live in the area are undernourished and at risk of famine; whereas countries of this geographical area figure among those with the lowest health standards in the world;
Amendment 14 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital -A a (new)
Recital -A a (new)
-Aa. whereas the region has a long history of conflicts and whereas there in a relationship between conflict, poverty and underdevelopment; whereas sustainable development cannot be achieved in an environment of tensions, armed conflicts and unstable government institutions, while at the same time poverty and under- development are conflict-generating factors; whereas climate change can further exacerbate the situation in the Horn of Africa, were severe droughts have already become more frequent;
Amendment 82 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the appointment of a European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Horn of Africa, as called for by Parliament in its aforementioned resolution of 10 May 2007 on the Horn of Africa; recalls that in its resolution Parliament asked the EUSR for the Horn of Africa to submit regular reports to Parliament, and invitwelcomes the EUSR for the Horn of Africa commitment to maintain dialogue and exchanges of views with its Members on a regular basis; also welcomes the appointment of a EUSR for Somalia and a EUSR for Sudan and South Sudan; believes that with a view to securing full consultation and coordination of action, the twohree Special Representatives should be consulted on a regular basis by the competent programming services for the financial instruments for the external action of the EU, and should provide them with regular political and strategic advice;
Amendment 87 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the important contribution made by EUNAVFOR Operation ATALANTA totalanta in the effort to fight piracy and improve maritime security off the coast of Somalia by; underlines its role in protecting World Food Programme chartered vessels delivering aid to Somalia and other vulnerable vessels, as well as supplies to AMISOM; welcomes the Council decision of 23 March 2012 prolonging EUNAVFOR Atalanta to December 2014 and extending its mandate to target the operational bases of pirates onshorearea of operation to include Somali coastal areas as well as internal and territorial waters; urges the Member States to ensure that EUNAVFOR Atalanta is properly supported with adequate surveillance and patrol ships, as well as with the means for pursuing pirates on landnecessary means for effectively fulfilling its mandate;
Amendment 113 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the need for close strategic coordination amongst all security-related actors, in particular EU-NAVFOR ATALANTA, EUTM Somalia and EUCAP Nestor, as well as NATO (Operation Atlantic Shield), the UN and the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM); bwelieves that the decision bycomes, therefore, the Council decision of 23 March 2012 to activate, onfor an ad hoc basisinitial two-years period, the EU Operations Centre should facilitate greater EU coordinatin order to coordinate and increase synergies between the three CSDP missions in the framework of the StrategyHorn of Africa, as well as the Brussels- based structures, in the context of the Horn of Africa Strategy and in liaison with the European Union Special Representative for the Horn of Africa;
Amendment 121 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the EU's decision to provide additional support to AMISOM, to allow it to fulfil its mandate and to reach a total strength of 17 731 troops, as authorised by the UN;
Amendment 128 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls, as a matter of urgency, for assistance to the justice and penitentiary systems of the countries that have concluded transfer agreements with the EU (Kenya, the Seychelles and Mauritius), as well as support for the Somali authorities to ensure that they have the judicial capacity and legal due processes, in accordance with international human rights standards, to handle captured pirates and Al-Shabaab militants; at the same time, underlines the importance of rehabilitation and reintegration of these people in society;
Amendment 161 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that the end of the TFG's mandate is a key test of the potential of Somalia as a functioning state; believes that it will bSomalia has made a major step forward with the recent election of a President, the adoption of the provisional Constitution, and the selection of the new Federal Parliament; underlines the important toce of facilitateing an inclusive political dialogue in Somalia and promote consensus-building processes to support the new government of Somalia; welcomes, in this regard, the recent peace initiative of the Somali government, offering civilian jobs and training for defecting Al Shabaab rebels; stresses that viable and inclusive economic structures and a system of revenue-sharing for future oil and gas exploitation in Puntland, for the benefit of the whole country, will be essential for the long-term sustainability of Somalia as a federal state;
Amendment 168 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Deeply regrets that, since December 2011 alone, 13 journalists and media workers have been killed in government- controlled areas of Somalia and no progress has been achieved in the prosecution of these cases; underlines the importance of securing freedom of expression and urges the new government and President to adopt measures to provide better protection for journalists and to carry out credible investigations into these killings;
Amendment 177 #
2012/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines the very positive example of Somaliland, which has demonstrated its capacity to develop and consolidate its democratic, economic and administrative structures over more than twenty years; notes that Somaliland has so far been very successful in consolidating security and stability on its territory and in cooperating in the fight against piracy and terrorism; expresses concern, however, that should Al-Shabaab regroup in its mountainous border regions, Somaliland may become vulnerable; stresses, therefore, that it is essential to support Somaliland in the fight against terrorism, including promoting economic diversification and building capacity for youth employment; stresses that in the quest for a solution for the long- term stability and security of Somalia it is important to evaluate the positive example of Somaliland's stability; notes that Somaliland currently seeks re-recognition as a separate state in its own right; reiterates, however, its call for resumption of dialogue with the newly appointed Federal Government of Somalia, without preconditions and with the view of reaching a commonly acceptable peaceful solution;
Amendment 2 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) (COM(2011)0838/4),
Amendment 27 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas 20 years after the Copenhagen summit the moment has come for a general re-evaluation of the accession criteria, of the established procedures and of enlargement policy as a whole; whereas Parliament contributes to improving the transparency and accountability of enlargement and thereby increasing public support for this process;
Amendment 49 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas each country has to be judged on its own merits in fulfilling the same set of criteria; whereas the pace of the accession process should be dictated by effective compliance with the accession criteria, as well as fulfilment of the priorities of the European and Accession Partnership and the negotiating framework; whereas the degree of compliance with the requirements for membership has to be assessed in the most fair and transparent fashion;
Amendment 59 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas true reconciliation between different peoples and the establishment of good neighbourly relations between countries contribute substantially to a genuine European integration process, and are of key importance to the enlargement process; whereas a number of candidate and potential candidate countries continue to have unresolved issues with their neighbours; whereas these issues should be resolved prior to accession;
Amendment 67 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Strongly believes that enlargement needs to continue to be a credible policy; considers it, therefore, important for the EU to fulfil the promises alreadyand the candidate and potential candidate countries to respect the commitments made and to create the conditions for ensuring that future enlargements are successful;
Amendment 95 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the EU continues to be attractive, also because of its unique combination of economic dynamism with a social model, and regrets that this social dimension has been largely neglected in the enlargement process; invites the Commission to reflect on possible options, including developing a set of social criteriaespecially in the framework of Chapter 19 (Social Policy and Employment), to address this deficiency and foster positive social transformation in the future EU Member States; reminds that the acquis in the social field includes minimum standards in areas such as labour law, equal treatment of women and men, health and safety at work and anti- discrimination, and that the EU treaties confirm commitment to the European Social Charter of 1961 and the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers of 1989, while also the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights contains a number of fundamental social rights; stresses that failure to comply with the EU's common basic social standards constitutes a form of social dumping which is detrimental to European enterprises and workers; points out that social partners and in particular trade unions need targeted EU assistance in order to reinforce their capacities;
Amendment 101 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Is of the view that the set of accession criteria should be adequately translated into clear, specific and measurable objectives in the Instrument for Pre- accession Assistance (IPA) in order to clearly demonstrate the link between Union-funded policies in the enlargement countries and progress in meeting the general accession criteria;
Amendment 113 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Takes the view that strict conditionality requires that the progress of a country is effectively assessed at every stage of the process, and that countries wishing to join the EU should proceed from one stage to the next only once all the conditions have been met at each stage; notes, however, certain tendencies to exaggeration, and recommends avoiding requiring of candidate and potential candidate countries higher standards than those applying in the EU; stresses the importance of defining more clearly the different stages and of setting transparent and fair benchmarks throughout the process;
Amendment 123 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to maintain and further develop a toolbox that draws on conditionality, and to intensify its monitoring of progress in the accession process, so as to ensure that candidate and potential candidate countries achieve a high degree of preparedness which will benefit both them and the EU;
Amendment 155 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Stresses that visa liberalisation is a good example of EU conditionality combining political and technical criteria with a desirable goal and tangible benefits; welcomes and supports, therefore, the efforts of the Commission and that of interested countries in this field;
Amendment 163 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Encourages greater participation by civil society and non-state actors in the accession process; stresses that civil society can work as an engine of approximation with the EU and create bottom-up pressure for the implementationadvancement of the European agenda; calls for additional financial support, inter alia via the Civil Society Facility, especially in order to enhance their capacities in monitoring the implementation of the acquis;
Amendment 172 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Strongly emphasises the need to enhance administrative capacities and human resources able to transpose, implement and enforce the acquis; takes the view that processes in the framework of enlargement should not be merely 'technical' and stresses the need to make the screening process more connected to the realities on the ground; calls, therefore, on the Commission to involve NGOs, trade unions and major stakeholders, as appropriate, in this exercise;
Amendment 175 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Calls for greater engagement of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) in the enlargement process; highlights its role in transmitting good practices to candidate and potential candidate countries, as well as in rallying civil society behind the cause of European integration in the EU; supports the further strengthening of dialogue between civil society organisations from the EU and the enlargement countries and encourages greater cooperation among the EESC, the Commission and the European Parliament;
Amendment 176 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9 c. Recalls that achieving sustainable economic recovery is a major challenge for most enlargement countries and underlines the need to promote smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy; calls for strengthening support to small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), critical for socio-economic progress in all enlargement countries, and urges the Commission to insist for priority reforms that create a favourable regulatory environment for innovative and high- potential SMEs; stresses, at the same time, the need for continued attention to the issues of a growing informal sector, high unemployment and integration of most vulnerable people in society;
Amendment 192 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates its position that bilateral issues should not represent or be used as an obstacle in the accession process, butTakes the view that any acceding State should resolve its main internal and bilateral problems, particularly those concerning territorial issues, before it can join the Union; these issues should be addressed in a constructive spirit and as early as possible, taking account of the EU's overall interests and its values; stresses that the accession negotiations should not be used to pre-empt the final settlement of such issues, notwithstanding and the obligation to fully comply with the acquis and respect the principles on which the EU itself is founded;
Amendment 198 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates its position that bilateral issues should not represent or be used as an obstacle in the accession process, but should be addressed in a constructive spirit and as early as possible, taking account of the EU's overall interests and its values; stresses that the accession negotiations should not be used to pre-empt the final settlement of such issues, notwithstanding the obligation to fully comply with the acquis and respect the principles on which the EU itself is founded; highly recommends the resolution of major disputes with neighbours before the start of accession negotiations so that these negotiations are not negatively affected;
Amendment 216 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the EU to support efforts to resolve outstanding disputes, including border disputes, before accession; in line with the provisions of international law and the UN Charter, encourages all parties to disputes whose continuation is likely to endanger the preservation of international peace and security to engage constructively in their peaceful resolution and, if appropriate, in case of proven inability to reach a bilateral agreement, to refer the matter to the International Court of Justice or to commit themselves to a binding arbitration mechanism of their choice;
Amendment 245 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Highlights the need to identify synergies between joint bodies established under the Stabilisation and Association Agreements; proposes that joint meetings between Joint Parliamentary Committees and Civil Society Joint Consultative Committees – run by the EESC - be organised in the near future in order to reach out to a larger audience in the candidate countries;
Amendment 270 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Remains fully committed to the prospect of enlargement, and calls on the Member States to maintain the momentum of the enlargement process by reconfirming the European perspective of every candidate and potential candidate country, notwithstandingalongside with the requirement of strict compliance with the Copenhagen criteria; stresses its conviction that with the Lisbon Treaty the EU can both pursue its enlargement agenda and maintain the impetus of deeper integration;
Amendment 285 #
2012/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Notes that the global financial crisis and the difficulties in the eurozone have highlighted the interdependence of national economies, both within and beyond the EU; emphasises, therefore, the importance of further consolidating economic and financial stability and fostering growth, also in the candidate and potential candidate countries; in these difficult circumstances, stresses the need to provide adequate and better targeted pre-accession financial aid to candidate and potential candidate countries; welcomes the increase proposed by the CommissionCommission proposal for a new Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance, which includes increased financial support for the financial perspective 2014- 2020; stresses, in this regard, the need to simplify and speed up procedures, as well as to strengthen the administrative capacity of the beneficiary countries, in order to ensure a high level of participation in EU programmes and to enhance absorption capacity; points out that a comprehensive position of the European Parliament on the IPA will be presented in the course of the ordinary legislative procedure, which applies to it;
Amendment 21 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 a (new)
Subheading 1 a (new)
Considers that trade is one of the basic elements of overall EU policy with a focus on respect for human rights and promoting political stability, sustainable development and the welfare of the countries of the Eastern Partnership;
Amendment 42 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Highlights the importance of conflict prevention through economic and social cohesion;
Amendment 63 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 67 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Welcomes the launch of the DCFTA negotiations, which will provide opportunities to strengthen economic relations between the two sides; it is necessary to sustain reforms to create a stable and transparent economic environment which will attract foreign investments, boost growth and create job;
Amendment 73 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Believes that the weakening of Armenia’s dependence on Russian commercial and governmental support as a result of Armenia opening its borders and strengthening international cooperation promotes its economic growth; believes that the conclusion of a DCFTA with the EU would be particularly beneficial in this regardopening borders and strengthening international cooperation will further promote Armenia’s economic growth;
Amendment 21 #
2011/2185(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas democracy is the best safeguard of human rights, fundamental freedoms, tolerance and equality;
Amendment 23 #
2011/2185(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas there is a link between human rights and development; whereas human rights are essential to achieving and sustaining the MDGs;
Amendment 32 #
2011/2185(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas 2010 marked the 10th anniversary of United Nations Security Council resolution (UNSCR) 1325 on women, peace and security; whereas, however, additional efforts are needed for its implementation in the EU and around the world;
Amendment 100 #
2011/2185(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that the mainstreaming of international justice must include systematically taking account of the fight against impunity in the broader context of trade, development and rule-of-law assistance; stresses that victimsrehabilitation and re-integration of victims in society must be the central concern; recommends that the Rome Statute of the ICC be added to the package of international treaties on good governance and the rule of law to be ratified by third countries admitted to the System of Generalised Preferences Plus (GSP+); recommends the consistent inclusion of ICC clauses in EU agreements with third countries;
Amendment 104 #
2011/2185(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Reiterates its call to the Council to authorise the High Representative/Vice- President (HR/VP) to draft guidelines for regular consultations between the ambassadors of the Member States and the EU's ambassadors, especially between those working at a multilateral level in places like Geneva and New York, so that the EU can successfully pursue its UN agenda and act for the promotion and defence of human rights;
Amendment 134 #
2011/2185(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Considers that the performance-driven approach "more for more" should drive the relations of the EU with all third countries, and that the EU should only grant partner countries advanced status if clear human rights and democracy requirements are met;
Amendment 140 #
2011/2185(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls for systematic support for new, freely and fairly elected parliaments, especially in countries in transition and those to which the EU has sent election observation missions; considers that such support should be financed by the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) and geographic instruments that should be adequately funded;
Amendment 153 #
2011/2185(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Stresses the importance, at the end of each election observation mission, of drawing up realistic and achievable recommendations, with the dissemination and monitoring of these recommendations to be carried out by EU Delegations; considers that Parliament's standing delegations and the joint parliamentary assemblies should play an enhanced role in following up these recommendations and analysing progress with regard to human rights and democracy; underlines the need to improve the working methodology of European Parliament election observation delegations and to take care to enhance the skills of the participating MEPs and personnel;
Amendment 191 #
2011/2185(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Emphasises the crucial importance of active civil society participation in and contribution to processes of governance, and insists that, in future, civil society must be engaged so as to contribute directly through an institutionalised ‘civil society monitoring mechanism’; welcomes the establishment of the Civil Society Facility (CSF), and calls for substantial funding for it in the forthcoming Multi-annual Financial Framework;
Amendment 242 #
2011/2185(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 61
Paragraph 61
61. Strongly condemns female genital mutilation (FGM) as an anachronistic practice and a barbarian breach of the bodily integrity of women and girls; firmly rejects any reference to cultural, traditional or religious practice as a mitigating factor; urges the Commission to pay specific attention to such traditional harmful practices in its strategy to combat violence against women;
Amendment 1 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
– having regard to Title V of the Treaty on European Union, and in particular to Articles 21, 42, 45 and 46, as well as to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Protocol No 10s thereto, in particular No 10 and 11,
Amendment 2 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the European Security Strategy (ESS) entitled "A secure Europe in a better world", adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003, as well as to the report on its implementation entitled "Providing security in a changing world", drafted under the responsibilities of the EU High Representative and endorsed by the European Council on 11-12 December 2008,
Amendment 3 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
- having regard to its resolutions of 11 May 2011 on the development of the common security and defence policy following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and of 10 March 2010 on the implementation of the European Security Strategy and the Common Security and Defence Policy, as well as to the previous resolutions on the same subject,
Amendment 4 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to the HR/VP Report on CSDP, presented during the Foreign Affairs Council of 18 July 2011,
Amendment 7 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes with grave concern the unprecedented cuts in the defence budgets of the majority of EU Member States in the wake of the financial, economic and debt crisis and the potential negative impact of these measures on their military capabilities; underlines and, therefore, on the ability of the EU to effectively take over its responsibilities in peace-keeping, conflict prevention and the strengthening of international security, in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter; underlines, in this regard, that defence constitutes a public good that affects the security of all European citizens and that all Member States need to contribute in a spirit of burden-sharing;
Amendment 17 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 19 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. WarnsExpresses its concern that uncoordinated budget cuts threaten to result in the completecould result in significant loss of certain military capabilities in Europe, at a time when the intervention in Libya clearly demonstrated that European countries are already lacking a number of capabilities vital to mounting an operation of that kind ; welcomes and supports, therefore, the Council's encouragement to the Member States to exchange information, as appropriate, and enhance transparency on current and forthcoming defence budget cuts, and calls for an impact assessment of these budget cuts for the development of capabilities in support of CSDP; reminds that the intervention in Libya clearly demonstrated that even a coalition of Europeand could hardly do sontries are unable to carry out an operation of that kind without US support;
Amendment 24 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 30 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Urges all EU Member States to assumeIn an increasingly complex and unpredictable security environment, urges all EU Member States to cooperate more closely and coordinate actions against the common threats identified in the European Security Strategy (ESS), assuming fully their part of the responsibility for peace and security in Europe, its neighbourhood and the wider world; reminds them of their repeated commitments, includingin this context, while reminding that not all threats are of military nature and that the EU has a variety of instruments at its disposal for crisis prevention and management, calls on the Council and the Member States to implement fully the provisions in the EU Treaty and European Council conclusies concerning the development of CSDP and to improve common defence capabilities; in particular, calls for conditions, to improve their military capabilitiesbe decided for the application of the solidarity (art. 222 TFEU) and mutual assistance clauses (art. 42.7 TEU), as well as to activate the important Permanent Structured Cooperation mechanism (art. 42.6 and 46 TEU);
Amendment 37 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Reiterates its view that a reinforced European defence will enhance the strategic autonomy of the EU and provide an important contribution to collective security in the context of NATO and other partnerships;
Amendment 42 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. PWithout disregarding different level of ambition, points out that the Member States collectively spend about EUR 200 billion a year on defence, which is only about a third of the US defence budget alonebut still a considerable amount demonstrating the costs of non-Europe in the defence area;
Amendment 46 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. DeploresNotes with concern the way in which most of these funds are spent, based on uncoordinated national defence planning decisions taken in almost total isolation, resulting not only in persistent capability gaps, but alsoresulting, often in wasteful overcapacities and duplications, as well as fragmented industry and markets;
Amendment 51 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Reiterates its strong belief that the EU and its Member States should devote more resources to non-proliferation and disarmament actions, as well as increase efforts for confidence-building and peaceful settlement of disputes in the neighbourhood and worldwide; takes the view that such a policy will alleviate the need for additional defence and avoid costly and dangerous arms races;
Amendment 56 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to accept that increased cooperation is the only way forward and that, in particular through (A) better coordination of defence planning, which includes harmonisation of military requirements and measures to increase interoperability, (B) pooling and sharing of certain functions and assets, (C) enhanced cooperation in research and technological development, (D) facilitating industrial collaboration and consolidation, and (E) optimisation of procurement and removing market barriers, the Member States can develop capabilities in a more cost- efficient way, and this without adverse effects for their sovereignty;
Amendment 77 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls again for an EU White Paper on security and defence tohat develops and implements the ESS, better defineing the EU's security and defence objectives, interests and needs more clearly in relation to the means and resources available; emphasises that it should be drafted and regularly updated on the basis of the national reviews, while at the same time providing a reference for them, linking national defence planning with a common security outlook and threat assessment;
Amendment 85 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Suggests thatRecalls that the Lisbon Treaty has reinforced the role of the European Defence Agency (EDA) in supporting the Member States askin the European Defencir efforts to improve the military capabilities for the Common Security and Defence Policy; suggests, therefore, that the Member States ask the Agency (EDA) to examine how to improve coordination of defence planning in Europe; recallsminds, furthermore, that the Treaty tasks the AgencyEDA to evaluate the observance of capability commitments and to promote the harmonisation of operational needs, and calls for better implementation of these tasks; recommends that, as a first step in the exercise, the Member States could submit their draft national security and defence reviews to the EDA for advice, to assess them in particular in the light of the capability priorities set by the EDA steering board in the Capability Development Plan, as well as of the plans of the other Member States and of relevant NATO initiatives; believes that, in the very short term, the EDA could also play an important role in defining capability priorities and identifying redundancies in Member States' capabilitiesa European capabilities and armaments policy;
Amendment 103 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that, in particular in areas such as strategic transportation, logistical support, maintenance, space capabilities, medical support, education and training, as well as certain niche capabilities, Member States can greatly profit from pooling or sharing of some functions and assets without creating significant dependencies that would limit their sovereign decision- making; strongly encourages initiatives addressing capability gaps in areas such as air-to-air refuelling, maritime surveillance, UAVs, CBRN protection, countering IEDs, satellite communication, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) sensors and platforms, and combat and information systems, including alternative to satellites systems, such as High Altitude Long Endurance (HALE) UAVs and the necessary green technologies required to achieve high operational autonomy and cost effectiveness;
Amendment 109 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. InvitesReminds that a common foreign and security policy would ensure theat Member States towould make creative use of the different pooling and sharing models that can be identified, such as (1) pooling through joint ownership, (2) pooling of nationally owned assets, (3) pooling of procurement, or (4) role- and task-sharing, and of combinations thereof as appropriate, and calls for quick progress especially in the areas mentioned above;
Amendment 121 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Recognises bilateral and regional initiatives such as the 2010 UK-French defence agreements and the Nordic Defence Cooperation as important effortsteps to rationalise the use of resources and fill short-term capability gaps; encourages furnotes ther progress in promisingposals for similar cooperation projects in other regions, such as among the Visegrád Group countries; takes the view, however, that significant structural gaps remain which need to be addressed in a coordinated fashion at EU level, and that the EDA should be given a role in ensuring overall coherence; encourages further refleccalls for broader synergies among Member States and commitment to future European multilateral pooling and sharing arrangements; in this context, believes that the EDA should be given a role in ensuring overall coherence of efforts in the framework of CSDP and strongly encourages the implementation on howf the Treaty provisions on the Permanent Structured Cooperation that could be used to providealso as an overall coordination framework, building also on the ‘European semester’ exercise as proposed under (A);
Amendment 137 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Regrets the fact that the potential of economies of scale from collaborative projects remains largely unused, with about 85 % of R&T expenditure still spent nationally and the large majority of the rest is spent at bilateral and not multinational level, having as consequence the fragmentation among Member States; highlights the fundamental role of the EDA in coordinating and planning joint defence research activities; stresses the benefits of research cooperation in terms of improved interoperability, and eventually greater homogeneity among the equipment and capabilities of the national armed forces, since research is the first phase of any equipment programme and a solid basis for the European competitiveness;
Amendment 152 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Suggests the creation of a European research institute, possibly within the EDA, which will focus on doctrines, methodologies and perceptions of military action, compatible to the European Security Strategy and in line with the European values and the international law;
Amendment 158 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. RWhile it recognises that one of the likely consequence of restructuring will be the abandonment of some non-viable national industrial capacities, which may lead to employment concernsstresses that any medium and long term plans for such restructuring should be aimed at having the least impact on employment; recommends, therefore, greater synergies, based on more specialisation, interoperability and complementarity; calls for a better use of EU funding, such as the European Social Fund and European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, to support anticipation and adaptation to change;
Amendment 189 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54 a (new)
Paragraph 54 a (new)
54a. Stresses that the above mentioned standardisation and consolidation should be part of an EU- and not an industry- driven process to the benefit of the European interests and the real needs of the society, and that participation in common EU programmes and synergies should be - in principle - open to all Member States;
Amendment 199 #
2011/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 57
Paragraph 57
57. Takes the view that EU funds should be used to foster cooperation in education and training, encouraging the creation of networks between the defence industry, research institutes and academia; calls for the necessary arrangements to be made to allow the payment of stipends to cadets participating in the ‘military Erasmus’ programme from the EU budget, in order to give them equal treatment with students at civilian higher education institutions;
Amendment 63 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Insists, however, that tangible and credible incentives should be given to the neighbourhood countries to engage in the common goal of building deep democracy, as well as that differentiation based on performance and achievements should be predicated on clearly defined criteria and assessable benchmarks;
Amendment 98 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the importance of building a partnership with civil societies and,s a means to promote change and democratisation; in thatis context, takes note of the proposal for a Civil Society Facility (CSF) as a way to target resources more effectively and efficiently towards civil societyallocation of 22 millions of Euros to the Civil Society Facility (CSF) for the period 2011- 2013 and looks forward for the facility to be more substantially funded in the next financial perspective;
Amendment 121 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EEAS and the Commission to provide a clear methodology and detailed benchmarks to assess the democracy record of these countries and to deliver regular sufficiently detailed reports, which should be the basis for the allocation of funds under the new performance-based approach ‘more for more’; asks for these reports to be presented annually to its Committee on Foreign Affairs; insists on the need to systematically include civil- society organisations at all stages of the review process; takes the view that this performance-based approach means also "less for less" and reiterates its call for effective implementation of the Human Rights and Democracy Clause in EU agreements with third countries;
Amendment 222 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Recalls that the EU should improve the management of migrationand maximise the mutual benefits of migration for development, providing better conditions for the establishment of legal migrants in the EU and dealing with the root causes of irregular migration in the partner countries; considers that the EU needs to favour legal labour migration by concluding mobility partnerships, as well as to promote people-to-people contacts;
Amendment 274 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Recalls the importance of cofinancing specific tangible regional projects to contribute to a shared process of development and integration; in this regard, welcomes the opportunity offered by the establishment of the UfM to strengthen complementarity between bilateral policies and regional policies, in order to achieve more effectively the goals of Euro-Mediterranean cooperation, based on the mutual recognition of common values; welcomes in particular the commitment of the new secretary general of the union to work and bring forward UfM projects in the areas of democracy and civil society;
Amendment 31 #
2011/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas, according to the principle of complementarity, the ICC only acts in instances where national courts are unable or unwilling to hold credible trials at home, these instances making international courts essential for holding perpetrators of the worst international crimes to account; whereas cooperation among States Parties to the Rome Statute and with regional organisations is of outmost importance, particularly in situations where the jurisdiction of the Court is being challenged,
Amendment 53 #
2011/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas all the EU members are state parties of the Rome Statute and the EU itself signed a cooperation and assistance agreement with the ICC; whereas the EU member states are the biggest contributors to the ICC budget, while the EU through the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) funds individual projects in support of the ICC and international criminal justice,
Amendment 149 #
2011/2109(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Recommends that the EU, and particularly the EEAS, promote the universality of the Rome Statute and the fight against impunity, as well as respect for, cooperation with and assistance of the Court, including within the framework of the Cotonou Agreement and of dialogues between the EU and regional organisations, particularly the AU, the Arab League, the OSCE, and the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN);
Amendment 5 #
2011/2068(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Regards the sustainable and efficient use of resources as a key element of the European Union's external relations and believes that trade in environmental goods and services can be an instrument of sustainable economic development, to the benefit of both trade and the environment;
Amendment 9 #
2011/2068(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Has clearly ascertained that the intensive use of global resources, particularly non-renewable ones, is dangerous for the planet and also threatens the security of energy supplies;
Amendment 12 #
2011/2068(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the support and preservation of an open and non-discriminatory multilateral trading system and environmental protection canmust be mutually reinforcing;
Amendment 27 #
2011/2068(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that opening up global markets to environmental goods and services creates increased export opportunities, encourages the diffusion of green technologies, stimulates innovation and leads to lower prices, higher quality and greater consumer choice;
Amendment 29 #
2011/2068(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Asks the European Commission to incorporate to a greater extent issues related to raw materials, such as a) the limits on exports and b) investment aspects in current and future negotiations carried out by the EU on a bilateral or multilateral basis;
Amendment 6 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the proposal for EU diplomacy on raw materials and rare earths with the aim of ensuring access to raw materials, especially those considered crucial, and of urgently establishing an international regulatory platform and ensuring open global markets;
Amendment 41 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance of innovation at all stage of use of raw materials from detection until the recycling;
Amendment 53 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls the Commission to adopt measures for the improvement of transparency in the area of supply;
Amendment 3 #
2011/2050(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the EU and Russia are mutually dependent and would both benefit from greater economic cooperation, taking account of the principles of sustainable development and environmental protection;
Amendment 16 #
2011/2050(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Hopes that the Commission will be able to negotiate a strong new agreement, based on the four common spaces and with clear indications on regulatory and legislative issues and enforcement instruments; calls on Russia to endeavour to ensure that its legislation is compatible with EU legislation; underlines that 75% of FDI in Russia comes from the EU and emphasises that a legally binding agreement on trade and investment, laying the foundations for a dispute settlement regime, is essential;
Amendment 24 #
2011/2050(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Partnership of Modernisation as a pragmatic initiative towards a new agreement; regrets however the hesitation on the Russian side to implement reforms and remove obstacles to a mutually beneficial agreement by improving the local environment for business and investment, fighting corruption, removing protectionism, protecting intellectual, industrial and commercial property rights and strengthening democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights;
Amendment 1 #
2011/2033(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Recalls that the fight against corruption and organised crime is one of the most important benchmarks for any candidate or potential candidate country wishing to fulfil its European perspective;
Amendment 11 #
2011/2033(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets the fact that IPA-I funding levels still appear limited when set against the importance of these areas; considers it essential in the future financing of these areas under IPA-II that progress in meeting specific objectives on an independent and efficient judiciary, the rule of law and combating corruption, including their implementation, should be monitored and assessed on the basis of measurable indicators.; considers it also important to provide for a performance incentive under IPA-II to reward the performance in making substantial progress in meeting the relevant objectives specified in the strategy papers;
Amendment 45 #
2011/2032(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the resolution 63/168 adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 18 December 2008 calls for a global moratorium on the use of the death penalty; whereas the death penalty is still used as a method of punishment in many countries of the world and in some cases even on minors,
Amendment 102 #
2011/2032(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that democratic principles and values can be further encouraged with the promotion of the ratification of the Rome Statute of the ICC, giving priority to the regions that are underrepresented, in order to reinforce its universal character and the fight against impunity, genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity;
Amendment 2 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 9 June 2005 on the reform of the United Nations1, __________________ 1 Text adopted P6_TA(2005)0237.
Amendment 4 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
– having regard to the preliminary list of items to be included in the provisional agenda of the 66th regular session of the General Assembly1, __________________ 1 United Nations General Assembly document A/66/50.
Amendment 9 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas Article 47 TEU confers legal personality upon the Union, implying for it rights and responsibilities under international law; whereas the EU shares the purposes and respects the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, including the primary responsibility of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) with regard to peace and security in the world,
Amendment 11 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU should play a proactive part in building a United Nations that can effectively contribute to global solutions, peace and security and a rule-of-law-based international order; whereas, in accordance with Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), the EU is formally committed to effective multilateralism with a strong UN at its core, which is essential in order to address global challenges, such as climate change and securitypeace and security, climate change and environmental degradation, universality and indivisibility of human rights, as well as poverty reduction and development for all,
Amendment 20 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the establishment of the European External Action Service (EEAS) should significantly contribute to the furtherand the UN Women should redouble the efforts of the international community as to the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolutions 1325 and 1820 and subsequent resolutions, through both its internal structure and, its external actions and policies, as well as a better management and economies of scale in order to outreach their results,
Amendment 23 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas strengthened efforts to combat terrorism in the world have increased the need to address security whilst fully respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Amendment 27 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to advance effective multilateralism as the overriding strategic concern of the Union and to strengthen the coherence and visibility of the EU as a global actor at the UN, inter alia by reducing the emphasis onbetter coordinating and speeding up the internal EU consultations on UN issues and by moving on to promote greater outreach on a wide range of issues; to authorise the VP/HR to draft a code of conduct framing the relations between ambassadors of the Members States and the EU Ambassadors, especially of those working at a multilateral level in places like Geneva and New York, so that the EU can successfully pursue its UN agenda and meet the expectations of UN members regarding its ability to act; to foster greater cohesion both within the UN system and between the positions of EU Member States and candidate and potential candidate countries, so as to maximise the potential offered by the Lisbon Treaty to strengthen the EU'’s impact through the coordinated and strategic use of its various and distinctive (EU and Member States) entry points,
Amendment 33 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) whilst retainingbuilding on its observer status in the UNGA and in accordance with the UN Charter and the intergovernmental nature of the UN, to make - in order to enable the new EU representatives to speak effectively and inaffirm that the Union shares with its Member States the responsibility to be actively involved in the UN system and to stress the need for the EU to speak with a single voice; basing its a ctimely manner on global issues, in keeping withon on the provisions of Article 47 TEU on the legal personality of the EU and implementing Articles 18 and 47 TEU -TEU on the competences of the HR, to make the necessary arrangements so that the EU can participate effectively in the work of the UNGA, on the basis of com and to enable the new EU reprehsensive consultation with UN Member Stattatives to speak effectively and in a timely manner on global issues; to reconfirm its commitment that the UN is at the centre of the EU'’s foreign policy and to reiterate the view that its effective participation in the work of the UN is not only an EU strategic priority, but also consistent with achieving the UN'’s goals and, as such, in the interests of its entire membership,
Amendment 42 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
Paragraph 1 – point d
(d) to fully support, through specific budgetary commitments, UN Women in its role of promoting gender equality and to protect and empower women, including in conflict and post-crisis situations, working in close coordination with other parts of the UN system; welcomes the allocation of 1.5 million euros for programmes on Women Peace and Security under the Instrument for Stability (IfS) and recalls that gender mainstreaming should be applied all through the crisis preparedness actions of the IfS,
Amendment 56 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) to work towards achieving consensus on and developing a more operational approach towards the doctrine of Responsibility to Protect (RtoP); whilst stressing its importance in preventing conflicts, to encourage the implementation of RtoP, inter alia, by strengthening the role of regional organisations such as the African Union (AU), by strengthening early-warning mechanisms within the UN and by better defining the roles of relevant UN bodies; welcomes UNSC Resolution S/1970 (2011/95) of 26 February 2011, which called on the Government of Libya to meet its responsibility to protect its population, the very first time that the RtoP doctrine has been mentioned in a formal UNSC statement in referenceas well as UNSC Resolution 1973 (2011) of 17 March 2011, which stressed the determination of the international comunity to ensure the protection of civilians and civilian populated areas, as first practical implementation of the RtoP doctrine under a clear UN mandate and with regard to an ongoing crisis,
Amendment 63 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) to promote security and stabilisation through peacebuilding, whilst tackling peacebuilding itself through longer-term development efforts and by ensuring that peacekeeping is both planned and implemented within the framework of a comprehensive single UN strategy, which takes account of peacebuilding needs and the future transition to a longer-term- strategy early on in both the planning and implementing stages and on which the EU bases its own measures; given that the stabilisation of a conflict-torn country requires more complex action and an integrated approach, and not merely troops, the necessary capacities should be orchestrated by means of such a strategy, in order adequately to address the root causes of conflict, given that half the countries in which peacekeeping operations are deployed lapse back into conflict within 10 years of the departure of the peacekeeping forces,
Amendment 64 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) to insist on the need to take the lessons from the recent developments in Japan and to bring forward proposals aiming at enhancing the international framework with regard to the peaceful use of nuclear energy; to underline the need to increase security standards of existent nuclear plants and conduct proper evaluation studies before constructing new ones, particularly in seismic areas; to call for improved cooperation in case of similar man-made or natural disaster in order to minimize the consequences of radioactive releases for human beings and the environment,
Amendment 73 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i
Paragraph 1 – point i
(i) to consider it an EU strategic priority to strengthen international crisis-management partnerships and to enhance dialogue with other major crisis-management actors, such as the UN, OSCE, NATO and the AU, and third countries, such as the USA, Turkey, Norway and Canadaencourage active participations of EU and third countries; to synchronise actions on the ground, share information and pool resources in the fields of peacekeeping and peacebuilding, including cooperation on crisis management and, in particular, maritime security, and the fight against terrorism under international law; to improve coordination, in this regard, with the International Financial Institutions (IFIs) and bilateral donors,
Amendment 95 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n
Paragraph 1 – point n
(n) to insist on the need of harmonizing the efforts of various UN organs in order to better promote the efficiency and effectiveness of development and social issues around the world; to live up to the pledges made at the MDG summit as regards gathering together the resources needed to meet the targets by 2015, in particular by meeting the EU'’s commitments on official development aid; to strongly advocate an increase in the level of financial investment in order to meet the MDG targets and to rapidly scale up and replicate proven innovative programmes and policies aimed at overall development and economic and social transformation,
Amendment 98 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point q
Paragraph 1 – point q
(q) to prepare for and activelyactively continue to participate in the review of the HRC in New York and theits follow- up, to that reviewstrengthen compliance with its mandate; to address the HRC'’s ability to continue to tackle urgent situations involving serious human rights violations as in the recent cases of Libya and the Ivory Coast, to improve its capacity to implement existing international norms and standards and enhance its role as an early- warning and preventive mechanism able to prioritise and address the root causes of human rights violations with the aim of preventing freshnew or further escalation of human rights violations, including through its support for capacity building for national human rights institutions; to seek ways of improving the HRC'’s election procedures in order to address the issue of the quality of HRC membership; to develop a viable working relationship between the HRC and the Third Committee, and between the HRC and the UNHCR , and in that respect calls for the abolition of the possibility of regional groups to present a predetermined slate of candidates for UNHRC membership; to develop a viable working relationship between the HRC and the Third Committee, and between the HRC and the UNHCHR; reiterates its position that the review should preserve the independence of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and opposes any attempts to change the status of the OHCHR which could impact negatively on the funding and consequently on its dependence,
Amendment 109 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point s
Paragraph 1 – point s
(s) to support the financing, through specific budgetary commitments, and the capacity, accountability and effectiveness of UN Women, so that it can coordinate relevant activities more effectively, to incorporate a gender perspective into all UN policies and create institutional coherence/synergy; to concentrate efforts, also by contributing to improved strategic planning, on the implementation of UNSC Resolution 1325, especially as regards women's presence in peace talks, thereby enabling them to become mediators, raising their skills, and empowering them as decision-makers, and, in general, linking women and development,
Amendment 116 #
2011/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point t a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point t a (new)
(ta) to promote an official, judicial legitimisation of the term "climate refugee" - intended to describe people who are forced to flee their homes and seek refuge abroad as a consequence of climate change - which is not recognised yet in international law or in any legally binding international convention although 'climate refugees' could receive protection through a broader application of existing international conventions via the principle of the states obligation of guarding the respect of human rights of all in case of disasters; to support an active participation of the Commission in the ongoing debate on Protection Gaps and Responses launched by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in the framework of the 2010 High Commissioner's Dialogue on Protection Challenges which aims at improving the existing international protection framework for forcibly displaced and stateless people,
Amendment 4 #
2011/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the sustainable development of any country is possible only if democratic institutions, the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as a strong civil society, are ensured,
Amendment 14 #
2011/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the EU and the countries of Central Asia share a common interest in diversifying export routes and in cooperating on energy and environmental sustainability,
Amendment 66 #
2011/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is seriously concerned about the continued use of torture and the severe restriction of the media and of freedom of expression, assembly and association; urges the EU and its HR/VP to raise publicly the cases of political prisoners, imprisoned human rights defenders and journalists and call for their immediate release;
Amendment 70 #
2011/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Underlines its continued concern over the child labour situation, a labour that in different ways and degrees is still abused in almost all the Central Asia countries; urges these countries to implement in practice their international commitments, more in particular under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the ILO Minimum Age Convention and the ILO Convention on the Worst Forms of Child Labour;
Amendment 96 #
2011/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Given the increasing electricity shortages in Central Asia, highlights the opportunities for regional synergy, including in the promising renewable energy sector; calls on the EU to provide political support and technical assistance for initiatives in this field;
Amendment 101 #
2011/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses that water issues in the region remain one of the main sources of tension and potential conflict and underlines the importance of a regional approach to protect and properly manage shared water resources; calls in this regard on all countries of the region to sign and ratify without further delay the Espoo and Århus Conventions and to foster involvement of local actors in decision- making;
Amendment 108 #
2011/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Subheading 4
Security/border management, people-to- people contacts
Amendment 129 #
2011/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 f (new)
Paragraph 19 f (new)
19f. Calls on the EU to continue supporting people-to-people contacts and exchange actions with regard to science, business and education; in this regards, notes shortcomings in the organisation and implementation of the EU-Central Asia Education Initiative and urges the EU Commission to address them in close cooperation with education specialists and the Central Asia partners,
Amendment 190 #
2011/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Reiterates its concern over reports of continued use of forced child labour in Uzbekistan’s cotton industry and urges the Uzbek authorities to accept a high level ILO monitoring mission to assess the situation on the ground;
Amendment 1 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) and the protocols thereto, especially Amended Protocol II on Landmines, Booby-Traps, and Other Devices and Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War,
Amendment 2 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
Citation 2
– having regard to its most recent resolutions of 22 April 2004 on anti- personnel landmines1 of 7 July 2005 on a mine free world2 , of 19 January 2006 on disability and development3 , and, of 13 December 2007 on the 10th anniversary of the Mine Ban Treaty4 , and of 6 September 2001 on measures to promote a commitment by non-State actors to a total ban on anti-personnel landmines,
Amendment 3 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
Citation 3
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1724/2001 of 23 July 2001 concerning action against anti-personnel landmines in developing countries and Council Regulation (EC) No 1725/2001 of 23 July 2001 concerning action against anti-personnel landmines in third countries other than developing countries5 ,
Amendment 4 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
Citation 4
– having regard to the November 2009Cartagena Action Plan 2010-2014: Ending the Suffering Caused by Anti-personnel Mines adopted at the Second Review Conference of the 1997 Ottawa Convention, which took place in Cartagena, Colombia, from 30 November to 4 December 2009,
Amendment 11 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital - A a (new)
Recital - A a (new)
-Aa. whereas the EU has been actively engaged in mine action, especially since its Joint Action of 1995, and is committed to the goal of a total ban and elimination of anti-personnel landmines (APL) worldwide; whereas the EU is a leading supporter of and contributor to mine action, which is among its human rights, humanitarian and development aid priorities,
Amendment 12 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas ‘“Mine Action’” includes survey, detection, marking and clearance of anti- personnel landmines (APL) and other explosive remnants of war (ERW) - including abandoned ordnance (AO), unexploded ordnance (UXO), cluster munition remnants and victim-activated improvised explosive devices (IEDs), mine - as well as mine and ERW risk education, victim assistance and stockpile destruction, together with advocacy aimed at promoting the universalisation of relevant international conventions and treaties in order to put an end to the production, trade and use of APL,
Amendment 16 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas by 1 December 2010, 1156 States have acceded to or ratified the Mine Ban Treaty and another 2 states have signed but not yet ratified it; whereas 96 states are bound by the Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices (Amended Protocol II to the CCW) and 69 states are bound by the Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War (Protocol V to the CCW); whereas 56 Sstates had formally agreed to be bound byve ratified the Convention on Cluster Munitions and another 52 states have signed but not yet ratified it; whereas synergy among these international instruments has to be ensured; whereas two remaining EU Member States are in a process of finalizing their ratification process of the Mine Ban Treaty (by 2012),
Amendment 18 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas in 1999 there were an estimated 18,000 casualties from APL/ERW/IED and by 2009 this had reduced to under 4,000the number of reported casualties from APL/ERW/IED has considerably decreased over the past decade (approximately 5,000 in 2009 in comparison to an estimated 18,000 in 1999 according to reports by the Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor, while 70% of victims were civilians and/or children); whereas, however, millions of people are still affected by ALPs and ERWs all over the world,
Amendment 20 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas only onetwo governments – Myanmarin Burma/Myanmar and Libya – hasve recently laid APL, no exports or state transfers of APL were recorded, and only three states were thought to be continuing their manufacture,
Amendment 22 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas most responsible armed forces long ago ceased using APL, but they havevarious armed non-state actors continued to be a weapon of choice, along with IED, by insurgent and terrorist groups and other non-state actorsuse APL, along with victim- activated IED,
Amendment 26 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas, in the first instance, it is the responsibility of affected states to address the problems of APL and ERW on their territory, particularly once conflict has ceased before, during and after a conflict,
Amendment 31 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Recital M a (new)
M a. whereas risk reduction education is a key element in helping people, especially children, in mine affected regions to live more safely and to learn about the dangers of ALP and ERW,
Amendment 33 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Strongly welcomes the fact that 156 countries have now acceded tojoined the Mine Ban Treaty including 265 EU member states but regrets that some 379 countries have still not signed; urges all states still outside the Treaty to join in the shortest possible delay; encourages in particular those EU Member States that have yet to accede to the Treaty to complete they ratification process by 2012 as announced;
Amendment 39 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Supports fully the implementation of the Cartagena Action Plan that provides for a detailed five year plan of commitments in all areas of mine action and calls on the Council to adopt a decision in support of this Plan as soon as possible;
Amendment 40 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Takes the view that mine action should be closely associated with action against cluster munition and other devices that kill indiscriminately; welcomes therefore the entry into force of the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 1 August 2010 as well as the adoption of the 2010 Vientiane Declaration and the Vientiane Action Plan; commends all states that have signed and ratified the CCM but regrets that 139 countries, including 10 EU Member States, have not adhered so far; calls on the EU and its Member States to promote the universalisation and implementation of the CCM;
Amendment 41 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2 c. Stresses the need of finding synergy between the various dimensions of mine action, with special regard to humanitarian and development aspects, also by increasing local ownership of and participation in related projects, in order to better respond to the need of the directly affected population;
Amendment 43 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the fact that a further seven countries announced completion of their clearance activities in 2009 and 2010, bringing the total number of states to do so to 16 but regrets that 26 states needed to request an extension to their clearance deadline under the Mine Ban Treaty;
Amendment 46 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. IReminds states of their international obligation to destroy APL stockpiles; is concerned that that China and Russia have the largest stockpiles of APL with an estimated 100 million and 24.5 million respectively and underlines therefore the particular importance of both countries' accession to the Mine Ban Treaty;
Amendment 48 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls on the EU to continue promoting the universalisation of the Mine Ban Treaty and other relevant conventions, also by including the issue of mine action in its political dialogue and agreements signed with third countries;
Amendment 49 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the widespread and indiscriminate use of APL during more than three decades of conflict has meant that Afghanistan is one of the world'’s most heavily contaminated countries, further afflicted by the use of IEDs by the Taliban and other armed non-state actors; underlines the possible significant contribution by mine action to economic and social development in the country with special regards to rural areas;
Amendment 51 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Deplores the fact that, despite more than a decade of clearance by the world's largest humanitarian demining programme, Afghanistan still has one of the highest APL casualty rates in the world and expresses grave concern over the high number of children affected by APL and ERW in the country, as of the 508 APL/ERW/IED casualties between 1 March 2009 and 1 March 2010, over half were children;
Amendment 53 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that some $80 million was donated by the international community for mine action in Afghanistan in 2009 and that since 2002 the European Union's financial and technical assistance amounting to €89 million has helped to clear approximately 240 km² of APL in the country, making land economically accessible, and enabling properties to be reconstructed and families to return home;
Amendment 57 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. NoteRegrets that, 16 years after the end of conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), there is still a high level of APL/ERW contamination, despite significant international funding and national efforwith about 11.000 minefields and an estimated 220,000 active APLs and ERWs throughout the country representing a serious challenge to security and an impediment to economic and social development;
Amendment 60 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Applauds EUFOR ALTHEA and its Mines Risk Education Instructors for having provided training to several thousands of people and encourages them to continue their efforts;
Amendment 67 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Recognises that the lives and livelihoods of APL/ERW/IED casualties are blightmarked for ever, that these innocent victims often come from the poorest elementspeople in some of the poorest countries, and require highly specialised and continuing support and assistance, and that this will be necessary even when there are no further casualties; urges to apply a broad definition of victims in mine action in order to include also indirect victims, such as family and the community;
Amendment 70 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. Stresses relevant obligations of States under international human rights and humanitarian law to adequately provide age- and gender-sensitive assistance, including medical care, rehabilitation and psychological support, as well as to actively support the socio- economic reintegration of APL and ERW victims;
Amendment 74 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Notes theat - even if advances that have been made in mine detection technology, training and techniques but regrets that- rapid, reliable, cost effective solutions remain elusive and that time-honoured but labour intensive, time consuming, and dangerous techniques using manual probes inevitably remain in widespread useechniques using manual probes inevitably remain in widespread use; acknowledges the important contribution of the UN International Mine Action Standards (IMAS) in enhancing safety and efficiency of mine action by setting standards and providing guidance as well as the role of the UN Mine Action Service in coordinating mine action efforts;
Amendment 75 #
2011/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Notes that the most fruitful prospects for technical advances in detection lie in tailor-made methods based on the combination of a number of technologies, and further crossover from technologies to combat the IED threat to military operationsin order to avoid casualties and perform demining with minimal environmental impact;
Amendment 9 #
2011/0413(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
c) to address specific global and trans- regional threats having a destabilising effect, and to ensure preparedness to address pre- and post-crisis situations, including climate change.
Amendment 11 #
2011/0413(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point c
Annex I – point c
c) support for the development of democratic, pluralistic state institutions, including measures to enhance the role of women in such institutions, effective civilian administration and related legal frameworks at national and local level, an independent judiciary, good governance and law and order, including non-military technical cooperation to strengthen overall civilian control, and oversight over the security system and measures to strengthen the capacity of law enforcement and judicial authorities involved in the fight against terrorism, organised crime and all forms of illicit trafficking, including human trafficking;
Amendment 12 #
2011/0413(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point e
Annex I – point e
e) support for measures necessary to start the rehabilitation and reconstruction of key infrastructure, housing, public buildings and economic assets, as well as essential productive capacity, as well as other measures for the re-starting of economic activity and the generation and maintenance of employment and the establishment of the minimum conditions necessary for sustainable social development;
Amendment 13 #
2011/0413(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point m
Annex I – point m
m) support for socio-economic measures to promote equitable access to and sustainable and transparent management of natural resources in a situation of crisis or emerging crisis;
Amendment 14 #
2011/0413(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point o
Annex I – point o
o) support for measures to support the development and organisation of civil society and its participation in the political process, including measures to enhance the role of women in such processes and measures to promote the internet and independent, pluralist and professional media;
Amendment 16 #
2011/0413(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
a) strengthening the capacity of law enforcement and judicial and civil authorities involved in the fight against terrorism, organised crime and all forms of illicit trafficking, including human trafficking, and in the effective control of illegal trade and transit.
Amendment 11 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) A European State which has applied to join the Union can become a member only when it has been confirmed that it meets the membershipaccession criteria agreed at the Copenhagen European Council in June 1993 and provided that the accession does not overstretch the capacity of the Union to integrate the new member. These criteria relate to the stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, good governance, respect of human rights and respect for, and protection of, minorities, the development of the economy that must be sufficient to withstand the competitive pressure in the internal market, and the ability to assume not only the rights but also and most importantly the obligations under the Treaties.
Amendment 13 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The accession process is based on objective criteria and the application of the principle of equal treatment of all applicant countries. Progression towards accession depends on the capacity of the applicant country to undertake the necessary reforms to align its political, institutional, legal, administrative and economic systems with the principles, rules, standards, policies and practices in the Union.
Amendment 14 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The European Council has granted the status of candidate country to Iceland, Montenegro, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and, Turkey and Serbia. It has confirmed the European perspective for Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia as well as and Kosovo, which are considered potential candidates.
Amendment 15 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Assistance under this Regulation should be provided in accordance with the enlargement policy framework defined by the Union for each beneficiary country reflected in the annual enlargement package of the Commission, which includes the Progress Reports and the Enlargement Strategy, in the Stabilisation and Association agreements and in the European or Accession Partnerships. Assistance should mainly focus on a limited number of policy areas that will help beneficiary countries strengthen democratic institutions and the rule of law, reform the judiciary and public administration, respect fundamental rights and promote gender equality and non- discrimination. It should also enhance their economic and social development, underpinning a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth agenda in line with the Europe 2020 strategy and to align progressivefully with the Copenhagen criteria. The coherence between the financial assistance and the overall progress made in the implementation of the pre-accession strategy should be strengthened.
Amendment 17 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) It is indispensable to involve more and more non-governmental organizations in the design and implementation of IPA-funded projects to ensure that IPA assistance reflects real needs and expectations, to raise the profile of IPA projects and to promote the development of a vibrant civil society in the recipient countries;
Amendment 21 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, enhanced respect for minority rights, promotion of gender equality and religious freedom, non-discrimination and freedom of the press, the media and the internet and promotion of good neighbourly relations;
Amendment 23 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a – point v
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a – point v
(v) the development of civil society and the launching and strengthening of the social dialogue;
Amendment 24 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) the achievement of Union standards in the economy and economic governance and fighting corruption and fraud; taking account also of the needs and the challenges created by the global economic crisis;
Amendment 28 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) combating unemployment, fostering employment and developing human capital;
Amendment 31 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point v
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point v
(v) the protection of natural resources, the sustainable management of rare earth metals, the development of physical capital, nuclear safety, the improvement of connections with Union and regional networks.
Amendment 33 #
2011/0404(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) combating unemployment, in particular youth unemployment; employment, social policies and human resources development;
Amendment 13 #
2011/0392(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The aim of the Galileo programme is to establish and operate the first global satellite navigation and positioning infrastructure specifically designed for civilian purposes. The system established under the Galileo programme is completely independent of other existing or potential systems and it is of key importance for the EU's strategic autonomy.
Amendment 14 #
2011/0392(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The Union recognises that, by definition, no space policy can be undertaken in isolation from other relevant actors in space. International co- operation is a fundamental part of the Galileo programme and the Commission, working closely with the European Space Agency (ESA) and the European External Action Service (EEAS), should continue to lead on space dialogues with strategic partners and emerging space powers.
Amendment 18 #
2011/0392(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Given the increasing usage of satellite navigation across a great number of fields of activity, an interruption in the supply of services could lead to significant harm to modern society. In addition, due to their strategic aspect, satellite navigation systems are sensitive infrastructures, that could be susceptible to malicious use. The abovementioned aspects could affect the security of the Union and its Member States. Security requirements must therefore be taken into account in the design, implementation and operation of the infrastructures emerging from the Galileo and EGNOS programmes. Capabilities at Member State level, as well as in the framework of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), should be developed in order to prevent spoofing attacks against the encrypted public regulated service (PRS) signal and to ensure the security of critical infrastructure.
Amendment 22 #
2011/0392(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Since the Union is responsible, in principle, for financing the programmes in full, the governance and operation of the European GNSS should remain under civilian control within the Union and provision should be made for it to own all tangible and intangible assets created or developed under these programmes. In order to comply fully with any fundamental rights relating to ownership, the necessary arrangements with existing owners should be made, particularly for essential elements of the infrastructures and their security. In order to facilitate adoption of satellite navigation by the markets, there is a need to ensure that third parties can make optimum use in particular of the intellectual property rights arising from the programmes which belong to the Union, in particular at social and economic level.
Amendment 23 #
2011/0392(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Galileo is the first complete civil positioning system. However, certain services of Galileo, particularly PRS, are of a dual-use nature and can also be used for defence purposes within the Member States and support CSDP missions, including crisis-management operations. Galileo will be of key importance in the event of implementation of Union solidarity and mutual-assistance clauses, as provided for by Article 222 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 42 (7) of the Treaty on European Union, respectively.
Amendment 24 #
2011/0392(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) The deployment and exploitation phases of the Galileo programme and the exploitation phase of the EGNOS programme should, in principle, be entirely financed by the Union. However in accordance with Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the financial regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, the Member States should be able to provide additional funding to the programmes or a contribution in kind, on the basis of appropriate agreements, in order to fund additional programme elements requested by them, e.g. concerning the system architecture or particular security needs. Third countries and international organisations should also be able to contribute to the programmes, to the extent that the independence of the global navigation satellite system of the Union is not affected.
Amendment 25 #
2011/0392(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) It is important to note that the investment and operating costs of the systems as estimated for the period 2014- 2020 do not take account of unforeseen financial obligations which the Union may be obliged to bear, in particular those relating to non-contractual liability arising from the public ownership of the systems, especially with regard to force majeure and catastrophic failure. These obligations are the subject of a specific analysis by the Commission and will be communicated to the Council and the European Parliament in due time.
Amendment 27 #
2011/0392(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Responsibility for the progress of the programmes includes, in particular, responsibility for their security and the security of their systems and operation. Except in the case of application of Joint Action 2004/552/CFSP of 12 July 2004 on aspects of the operation of the European satellite radio-navigation system affecting the security of the European Union, which could be adapted if necessary to changes in the programmes, their governance and the Lisbon Treaty, the Commission is responsible for security, even if certain security-related tasks are entrusted to the European GNSS Agency. It is the responsibility of the Commission to establish mechanisms to ensure suitable coordination between the various entities responsible for security, under the authority of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.
Amendment 30 #
2011/0392(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28 a (new)
Recital 28 a (new)
(28a) Exports outside the Union of dual- use equipment or technology and software relating to PRS use and relating to the development of and manufacturing for the PRS, regardless of whether that equipment, software or technology is listed in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items1, should be restricted to those third countries which are duly authorised to access the PRS under an international agreement with the Union. The EU list of controlled items is based on control lists adopted by international export control regimes, such as the Wassenaar Arrangement, the Australia Group (AG), and the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR). __________________ 1 OJ L 134, 29.5.2009, p. 1.
Amendment 42 #
2011/0392(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
Article 28 – paragraph 1
The Union may enter into agreements with third countries and international organisations in the context of the programmes, in particular, cooperation agreements in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The European Parliament shall be consulted and/or give its consent, as appropriate.
Amendment 56 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The Union's objective of ensuoffering a high level of security withinits citizens an area of Ffreedom, Ssecurity and Jjustice without internal frontiers, in which the free movement of persons is ensured (Article 67(33(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of theEuropean Union), should be achieved, inter alia, through common measures on through solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility between Member States and through common measures, inter alia, relating to the crossing of internal borders by persons and border control at external borders and the common visa policy as part of a multi-layer system aimed at facilitating legitimate travel and taregular immigration, while fighting against organised crime and traffickling illegal immigratn human beings (Article 67(2) and (3), Article 71(1) and Article 80 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the Union.);
Amendment 57 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Solidarity among Member States, burden-sharing, clarity about the division of tasks, respect for fundamental freedoms and human rights and the rule of law as well as a strong focus on the global perspective and the inextricable link with external security should be key principles guiding the implementation of the Internal Security Strategy.
Amendment 59 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) When executing tasks at external borders and consulates in accordance with the Schengen acquis on borders and visas, Member States carry out activities in the interest of and on behalf of all other Member States in the Schengen area and thus performing a public service for the Union. To express solidarity in practice, the Instrument should contribute to supporting operating costs related to border control and visa policy and enable Member States to systematically maintain capabilities crucial for that service for all. Such support consists of full reimbursement of a choice of costs related to the objectives under this instrument and will form an integral part of the national programmes.
Amendment 60 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) ThisRespecting the human rights of immigrants and refugees is of key importance for the Union. The instrument should be implemented in full respect of the rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, UN human rights treaties and international humanitarian law.
Amendment 61 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) It should include support for national measures and cooperation between Member States in the area of visa policy and other pre-frontier activities that take place prior to external border controls. The efficient management of activities organised by the services of the Member States in third countries is in the interest of the common visa policy as part of a multi- layered system aimed at facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigrationoffering a high- quality service to third-country nationals, facilitating legitimate travel and organising immigration in an orderly manner into the European Union, and constitutes an integral part of the common integrated border management system.
Amendment 63 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) To address immediately unforeseen migratory pressure and threatchallenges to border security it should be possible to provide emergency assistance in accordance with the framework set out in Regulation … (EU) No .../2012/EU laying down general provisions on the Asylum and Migration Fund and on the instrument for financial support for police co- operation, preventing and combating organised crime, and crisis management.
Amendment 65 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Measures in and in relation to third countries supported through this Instrument should be taken in synergy and coherence with other actions outside the EU supported through Union external assistance instruments, both geographic and thematic. In particular, in implementing such actions full coherence should be sought with the principles and general objectives of the Union external action and foreign policy related to the country or region in question. They should not be intended to support actions directly development-oriented and they should complement, when appropriate, the financial assistance provided through external aid instruments. Coherence and complementarity will also be sought with the Union humanitarian policy, in particular as regards the implementation of emergency measures.
Amendment 66 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) supporting a common visa policy to facilitate legitimate travel, ensure equal and decent treatment of third -country nationals and tackle irregular migration.
Amendment 67 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
(da) improving the capacity and the qualifications of all authorities and border guards operating at border- crossing points as regards the execution of their surveillance, advisory and control tasks with respect to international human rights law;
Amendment 68 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) training regarding the use of the related systems and promotion of quality management standards;
Amendment 69 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Following a Schengen evaluation report, as adopted in accordance with the Regulation on the establishment of an evaluation and monitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis, the Member State concerned shall examine, together with the Commission and the Frontex Agency, where appropriate, how to address the findingdeficiencies and implement the recommendations within the framework of its national programme.
Amendment 70 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
Article 12 – paragraph 3
Particular attention shall be paid to the financing of corrective actions. In dialogue with the Commission and the Frontex Agency, where appropriate, ithe Member State concerned shall reallocate resources under its programme, including, where necessary, those programmed for operating support, and/or introduce or amend actions aiming to remedy the weaknesses in accordance with the findings and recommendations of the Schengen evaluation report. Any additional costs shall be eligible for financing under the Instrument.
Amendment 71 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) to support and monitor the implementation of Union law and Union policy objectives in the Member States, and assess their effectiveness and impact, including with regard to fundamental freedoms and human rights;
Amendment 72 #
2011/0365(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Objective 3 – indent 2
Annex III – Objective 3 – indent 2
– staff costs, including for training
Amendment 31 #
2011/0308(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – point 1
Article 36 – point 1
Amendment 33 #
2011/0308(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – point 1
Article 36 – point 1
1. "Undertaking active in the extractive industry" means an undertaking with any activity involving the exploration, discovery, development, and extraction ofthe highest-level parent company publishing accounts within the Union, where the group of companies for which that parent company prepares consolidated financial statements includes subsidiary companies, branches, permanent establishments, joint ventures and associate undertakings engaging in any activity involving the exploration, discovery, development, extraction, processing, export or transportation of, or any significant activity related to, minerals, oil and natural gas deposits, as referred to in Section B-Divisions 05 to 08 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Amendment 38 #
2011/0308(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 3
Article 36 – paragraph 3
3. ‘Government’ means any national, regional or local authority of a Member State or of a third country. It includes a department, agency or undertaking controlled by that authority as laid down in Article 23 (1) to (6) of this Directive, or any government entity that receives any payment of the type referred to in Article 38 from any constituent entity of an undertaking.
Amendment 43 #
2011/0308(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 4
Article 36 – paragraph 4
4. "Project" is equivalent to a specific operational reporting unit at the lowest level within the undertaking at which regular internal management reports are prepared to monitor its business. It includes any contract, licence, lease or other legal agreement under which a company operates and from which its fiscal liabilities arise.
Amendment 62 #
2011/0308(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 38 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 38 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) licence fees, rental fees, pipeline transit fees, entry fees and other considerations for licences and/or concessions;
Amendment 63 #
2011/0308(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 38 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
Article 38 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) payments for infringements of the law, such as environmental and remediation liabilities;
Amendment 21 #
2011/0269(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) On 26 March 2010, the European Council agreed to the Commission's proposal to launch a new strategy, Europe 2020. One of the three priorities of the Europe 2020 strategy is inclusive growth by empowering people through high levels of employment, investing in skills, fighting poverty and modernising labour markets, training and social protection systems so as to help people anticipate and manage change, and build a cohesive society excluding none.
Amendment 25 #
2011/0269(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The scope of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 was broadened in 2009 by Regulation (EC) No 546/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as part of the European Economic Recovery plan to include workers made redundant as a result of the global financial and economic crisis. In order to enable the EGF to intervene in future crisis situations, its scope should cover redundancies resulting from a serious economic disruption when caused by an unexpected crisis comparable to the financial and economic crisis that hit the economy from 2008 onwards.
Amendment 49 #
2011/0269(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
The aim of the EGF shall be to contribute to economic growth and employment in the Union by enabling the Union to show solidarity towards workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, trade agreements affecting agriculture, or an unexpected financial and economic crisis, and to provide financial support for their rapid reintegration into employment, or for changing or adjusting their agricultural activities.
Amendment 51 #
2011/0269(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Actions benefiting from financial contributions by the Fund pursuant to Article 2(a) and (b) shall aim to ensure that a minimum of 50 % of workers participating in these actions find stablenter the employment market within a year from the date of application.
Amendment 56 #
2011/0269(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) at least 5300 workers being made redundant over a period of four months in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its suppliers or downstream producers;
Amendment 57 #
2011/0269(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) at least 5300 workers being made redundant over a period of nine months, particularly in small or medium-sized enterprises, operating in one economic sector defined at NACE Revision 2 division level and located in one region or two contiguous regions defined at NUTS II level, or in more than two contiguous regions defined at NUTS II level provided that more than 500 workers are made redundant in two of the regions combined.
Amendment 71 #
2011/0269(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. The Member State shall submit a complete application to the Commission within a period of 12 weeks from the date on which the criteria set in Article 4(1) or (2) are met or, where applicable, before the deadline set by the Commission in accordance with Article 4(3). In exceptional and duly justified circumstances the application may be supplemented with additional information by the applicant Member State within six months from the date of application, following which the Commission shall assess the application on the basis of the available information. The Commission shall complete its assessment of the application within twelveeight weeks of the date of receipt of a complete application or (in the case of an incomplete application) at the latest six months after the date of the initial application, whichever is the earlier.
Amendment 2 #
2011/0000(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the EU external energy policy aiming at ensuring secure, safe, environmentally friendly, sustainable and competitive energy supplies to companies and citizens;
Amendment 9 #
2011/0000(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the Commission to promote within the WTO the adoption of the principles of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and international standards on energy markets governance, including a gradual phasing out of fossil fuel subsidies with quantitative objectives;
Amendment 13 #
2011/0000(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Asks the Commission to foster R&D and innovation in renewable energies and technologies and promote the rational use of energy and to negotiate market access for related EU products and services, while promoting a gradual shift towards a low- carbon economy through trade agreements with, for example, suppliers of renewable electricity;
Amendment 18 #
2011/0000(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reaffirms the importance of increasing EU FDI in the building and modernisation of energy infrastructure and for energy efficiency in developing countries to help their energy-mix diversification, while enhancing the protection of European investments therein by appropriate legal means.
Amendment 2 #
2010/2311(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises that terrorism, as stated in the European Security Strategy1 and its Implementation Report2 , remains a major threat to international stability and European societies that requires a global response; welcomes, in the area of CSDP,ith full respect of human rights and fundamental freedoms; emphasises that counter-terrorism requires a comprehensive approach based on intelligence, police, judiciary, political and in some limited cases military means; reminds that under the solidarity clause defined in article 222 TFEU a CSDP operation could be decided to assist a Member State, at the request of its political authorities, in the event of a terrorist attack; underlines the need for preparedness and welcomes the ongoing update of the military database and the European Defence Agency'’s contribution to combating terrorism; affirms that human intelligence, on top of all technical means available, remains indispensable in tackling terrorist networks and timely preventing attacks;
Amendment 10 #
2010/2311(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Promotes a holisticSupports a comprehensive approach to counter- terrorism policy by suggesting the harmonisation of the European Security Strategy and the Internal Security Strategy3 , and the strengthening of existing coordination mechanisms between Justice and Home Affairs Council structures, agencies and the European External Action Service in order to better coordinate external and internal policy instruments; encourages the Counter-Terrorism Co- ordinator to continue his efforts in this field;
Amendment 17 #
2010/2311(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 22 #
2010/2311(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises the strategic cooperation between the European Union and the US reflected by various agreements; stresses therefore that the EU-USnited States of America and points out the need for cooperation with other partners; reiterating the importance it attaches to the protection of citizens' personal data and their human and civil rights, notes bilateral initiatives and agreements such as the EU-US and Member States 2010 Declaration on Counterterrorism, the Agreement on the Terrorist Finance Tracking Programme, the Toledo declaration on aviation security, and the Counter-Terrorism Declaration ares well as the EU-India Joint Declaration on International Terrorist, as positive examples to be followed in the Union'’s relations with other third countries;
Amendment 34 #
2010/2311(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points out the common values that the Union shares with othStresses the importance of counter international organisations, especially the UN; stresses the need for therorism cooperation in the framework of United Nations and calls for universal ratification and full implementation of theall UN conventions and protocols against terrorism; advocates the adoption of a UN Comprehensive Convention on TCounter Terrorism conventions; calls for a closer working relationship with UN bodies and regional organizations so that all UN Member States can fully implement their counterterrorism obligations; advocates the adoption of a UN Comprehensive Convention on Terrorism and an enhanced cooperation with the Council of Europe and the OSCE in counter-terrorism; asks for greater transparency and flexibility in the UN Security Council process of listing and delisting terrorist organisations and individuals; in this regard, welcomes the adoption of UNSC resolution 1904 (2009) that provided for a periodic review of the list and created an Office of Ombudsperson to assist the Sanctions Committee in de-listing individuals;
Amendment 42 #
2010/2311(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the EU commitment to combat the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the beneficial impact of this policy also for counter terrorism; urges the member states to ensure the highest standards of responsibility in export control policies and calls for strict implementation of the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports and the dual use items export control regime;
Amendment 1 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
- having regard to the Title V of the Treaty on European Union, and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Amendment 2 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the Charter of the United Nations;
Amendment 7 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the international system is undergoing rapid and profound change, driven by the shift of power towards emerging international actors and deepening interdependence, encompassing economic and financial affairs, environmental deterioration and climate change, energy and resource scarcity, and interconnected security challenges;
Amendment 9 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. considers that these developments should bring more attention to the human security dimension in the context of the European Security Strategy;
Amendment 16 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reiterates that the EU fully respects the previsions and the principles of the United Nations Charter and recognises that the primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security in the world lies with the UN Security Council;
Amendment 29 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point a
Paragraph 5 – point a
(a) the CFSP and the CSDP, which is an integral part of the former, have been placed within the legally binding institutional framework of EU principles (democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for human dignity, the principles of equality and solidarity, and respect for the principlescharter of the United Nations and the charterprinciples of international law), and their objectives have been merged with the general objectives of the EU'’s external action;
Amendment 32 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point a a (new)
Paragraph 5 – point a a (new)
(a a) The European Council regularly assesses the threats in order to enable the Union and its Member States to take effective common action;
Amendment 40 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point c a (new)
Paragraph 5 – point c a (new)
(c a) the treaties of the European Union include now the solidarity clause and the mutual defence clause which establish an obligation for the member states to provide aid and assistance by all means in the event a member state becomes the victim of a terrorist attack or of an armed aggression on its territory, in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter and without prejudice for the neutrality of certain Member States;
Amendment 55 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the importance of linking more closely the internal and the external aspects of the European security and urges the European Council to carry out its task of identifying the strategic interests and political objectives of the EU by drawing up a European fForeign pPolicy sStrategy geared to international developments, which should be based on real convergence of the different dimensions of EU external action and subject to regular review;
Amendment 90 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. welcomes the democratic change in Northern Africa, reiterating however its grave concern over the situation in Libya; calls on the Council and the HR to exploit every possibility offered by UNSC resolution 1970 in order to support humanitarian efforts in the region, including if necessary through a CSDP Joint Action; condemns attacks against civilians in Libya and warns that such actions constitute a grave violation of international humanitarian law; stresses, therefore, that no option provided by the UN charter should be ruled out and, in case of an explicit UNSC mandate, supports more drastic measures in close cooperation with the African Union, the Arab League and single countries of the region;
Amendment 98 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. DeploRegrets the scant results achieved by the Civilian Headline Goal 2010 process regarding civilian capabilities, and in particular the discrepancy between the personnel assigned by Member States on paper and the numbers actually available for missions, the modest progress as regards the training of human resources (no common standards, limited number of training programmes uploaded to the Schoolmaster training opportunities programme within the Goalkeeper software environment); calls on the High RepresentativeVP/HR, the Council, and the Member States to take coordinated steps to reactivate the development of civilian capabilities, especially where recruitment, gender balance, training, and deployment are concerned; in particular, stresses the importance of continuing building on the heritage of the two Civilian Headline Goals that the EU has conducted so far in order to face these outstanding challenges;
Amendment 207 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 – indent 1
Paragraph 48 – indent 1
– expansion of the CSDP to include wider Petersberg-type missions that could contribute to counterterrorism, not least through support to help third countries fight terrorism on their territory; recommends that these provisions be interpreted in sweeping terms in line with the relevant UN resolutions and with full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; reminds, however, that military response it is not by itself enough to defeat international terrorism and calls for sustained international efforts to indentify and deal with legitimate grievances behind the phenomenon, enhancing, at the same time, dialogue and broadening understanding among civilizations;
Amendment 209 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 – indent 2 a (new)
Paragraph 48 – indent 2 a (new)
- mutual assistance clause: considers it as an important political statement in favour of effective solidarity in the event of an external attack against any of the member states of the EU, this without contradicting the role of NATO in the European security architecture and, at the same time, respecting the neutrality of some EU member states;
Amendment 220 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51 a (new)
Paragraph 51 a (new)
51a. underlines the need to improve the European security by integrating maritime policy making and by linking military and civilian assets with a view of creating a common maritime surveillance network that guarantees efficient exchange of information, enhances situational awareness and provides preparedness for eventual common operations in the framework of CSDP; welcomes the Draft Roadmap towards establishing the Common Information Sharing Environment for the surveillance of the EU maritime domain, presented by the Commission in October 2010, as a first step in this direction;
Amendment 239 #
2010/2299(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60 – indent 2
Paragraph 60 – indent 2
EULEX Kosovo has been undermined by, am, the most important civilian missiong of ther things, disagreements among the Member States about recognition of the territory's independence and the logical and expedient takeover of the NATO KFOR miss EU, encountered many obstacles, mainly due to the lack of supporting legislation and staff constraints. However, it played an important role in the field of the rule of law and continues to provide stability in the region;.
Amendment 9 #
2010/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to the High Representative and Commission report on Climate Change and International Security of 14 March 2008, to the related recommendations of 18 December 2008, and to the Council conclusions of 8 December 2009,
Amendment 11 #
2010/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 b (new)
Citation 8 b (new)
- having regard to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime of December 2000 and the protocols thereto,
Amendment 12 #
2010/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 c (new)
Citation 8 c (new)
- having regard to the EU common immigration and asylum policy, as outlined by the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum and further developed by the Stockholm programme, adopted by the European Council in December 2009, as well as to the Commission Action Plan - Implementing the Stockholm Programme (COM(2010)0171),
Amendment 23 #
2010/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas political and economic, demographic, socio- economic and environment instability is thare major driving forces behind migration, particularly irregular migration, depriving affected communities of viable local prospects and, hence, of the right to choose whether to migrate or not and leaving them with migration, often irregular migration, as their only option,
Amendment 41 #
2010/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas economic instability has a particularly strong impact on younger generations, who are left without employment prospects and may more easily fall victim to violence, radicalism and recruitment by terrorist groupsorganised crime,
Amendment 43 #
2010/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas climate change is linked with food and water scarcity, deforestation and land degradation and is increasingly identified as a major threat to international security and stability,
Amendment 44 #
2010/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas people forced from their homes by large-scale disasters brought on by climate change need to be assisted and protected; whereas, however, the existing refugee law does not recognise international protection right to climate refugees,
Amendment 54 #
2010/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the exploitation of irregular migration is also combined with arms smuggling and drug trafficking - with an alarming strengthening of linkages between drug traffickers in Latin America and in States in West and Central Africa - and coincides with escape routes and enhanced mobility for terrorist groups, which can easily relocate to other regions and countries to pursue their activitiesmigrant smuggling affects almost every country in the world; whereas the exploitation of irregular migration is a known source oflso combined with arms smuggling, drug trafficking and funding ofor radical and terrorist groups,
Amendment 77 #
2010/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas measures should be taken to avoid new waives of racism and xenophobia in receiving and transit countries,
Amendment 86 #
2010/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas remittances, which can play a potentially positive role in fostering economic development, can at home; whereas, however, in some cases, as was the case infor Somalia and Eritrea, money transfers can become a financing tool for forces which seek to undermine any prospect of stability; whereas maximum transparency should thus be ensured in the transmission of such funds and particular care should be taken to secure the migrants' right to support their families and invest in their countries,
Amendment 101 #
2010/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. calls on the EU to continue to be at the forefront of international efforts to combat climate change, to systematically integrate climate change into all external and development cooperation policies, and to actively support the most affected third countries in their efforts to prevent or deal with the consequences of climate change; underlines, in this regard, the importance of transferring climate- friendly technologies and promoting the deployment of alternative energy and energy-efficiency innovations in the developing world; while expressing its concern that environmentally induced migration might grow in the future, welcomes the European Council mandate to the Commission to analyse the effects of climate change on international migration, including its potential effects on migration to the EU; supports an active participation of the Commission and EU Member States in the ongoing debate on Protection gaps and Responses launched by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in the framework of the 2010 High Commissioner's Dialogue on Protection Challenges which aims at the improvement of the existing international protection framework for forcibly displaced and stateless people;
Amendment 8 #
2010/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Β
Recital Β
Β. whereas its geopolitical environment makes the Gulf a focus of security challenges that have global and regional implications (the stabilisation of Iraq, Iran’s nuclear programme, Islamist terrorism, piracy and the situation in Yemen) and the GCC currently remains the only stable regional organisation based on multilateralism and cooperation,
Amendment 11 #
2010/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the Gulf is a region of crucial importance to the EU and, in a multipolar and interdependent world, such partnerships are able to meet political and security challenges,
Amendment 24 #
2010/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. ConsiderStresses that the EU should proposeobjective is a strategic partnership with the GCC and its member states commensurate with the respective roles of the two entities internationally; highlights the importance, to that end, of introducing regular summit meetings of heads of state and government;
Amendment 27 #
2010/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the European External Action Service to devote more resources to the region and for new diplomaticuse the financial resources earmarked for the region and to increase the human resources of missions tso be opened therthat they are able to help raise the profile of the EU, to facilitate political dialogue and to make the Union’s efforts more effective; stresses that differentiated bilateral approaches to states minded to engage in closer cooperation can only complement and strengthen the multilateral framework;
Amendment 31 #
2010/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Draws attention to the social and political developments that have taken place in recent years in most countries in the Gulf; encourages the Gulf states to sustain and extend their efforts to promote human rights, gender equality, the right to work – including for migrant workers – and freedom of expression and opin; insists on the importance of respecting freedom of speech, thought and religion and the need to safeguard the rights of minorities, including religious minorities; stresses that women's rights, gender equality and action to combat discrimination based on sexual orientation deserves special attention; invites the Gulf states to listen to the voices of civil society and to support the emergence of local structures and associations;
Amendment 53 #
2010/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Expresses its profound concern at seeing the Gulf region caught up in an arms race; asks the EU immediately to initiate a strategic dialogue with the GCC states on regional security issues of common interest (Iran’s nuclear capability, the stabilisation of Iraq, Islamist terrorism and the internal conflict in Yemen) and, ultimately, to contribute to building a regional security structure in the Middle East in partnership with the Gulf states;
Amendment 6 #
2010/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14
Citation 14
- having regard to its resolutions of 1 February 20075 and 26 April 20076 on the initiative for a universal moratorium on the death penalty and to United Nations General Assembly Resolution 62/149 of 18 December 2007 on a moratorium on the use of death penalty, as well as to its resolution of 7 October 2010 on the World day against the death penalty;
Amendment 13 #
2010/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights continues to be the world’s reference document, which puts theevery human personbeing at the heart of the action,
Amendment 169 #
2010/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31a (new)
Paragraph 31a (new)
31a (new). reiterates its call for effective accountability in cases of violations of international humanitarian law (IHL) and regrets that, despite the recommendations of the UN's Fact- Finding mission report and its recommendations supported by the Human Rights Council and the General Assembly, neither Israel nor Hamas brought the people responsible to the justice; expresses, furthermore, its grave concern for the fact that the international humanitarian law continues to be violated in and around Gaza and recalls the commitments undertaken by the EU members states under the Hague Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land, the four Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, and the EU Guidelines on promoting compliance with international humanitarian law; regrets the Israeli decision not to extend the moratorium on settlements in the West Bank, a practise illegal under international law and contrary to the peace efforts in the Middle East;
Amendment 174 #
2010/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Welcomes the decisions to abolish the death penalty in 2009 by Burundi and Togo and by the US State of New Mexico; regrets, however, the fact that the death penalty is still implemented in 35 out of 50 states of the US;
Amendment 192 #
2010/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Underlines the importance of comprehensive implementation of the twofold agenda set out in UN Security Council resolutions 1325 (2000) on women, peace and security, and calls on the Council to reinforce its actions in this area; , 1820, 888 and 1889 that call for the participation of women in all phases and at all levels of conflict resolution and the protection of women and girls from sexual violence and discrimination; reiterates that women’s rights include reproductive rights and calls on the EU to reinforce its actions in this area; strongly condemns rape used as an instrument of war and the recurrent mass rapes occurring in DR Congo; requests full disclosure on the incapacity of MONUSCO peacekeeping force to put a stop to mass rapes; and urges the EUHR, through EUSEC and EUPOL in DRC, to conduct an enquiry and report to the EP on all Congolese and international companies or entities involved in the extractive industries in DRC which pay any armed groups and security personnel involved in such mass rapes and other systematic crimes against civilians;
Amendment 208 #
2010/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42a (new subheading)
Paragraph 42a (new subheading)
Discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation
Amendment 210 #
2010/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42b (new)
Paragraph 42b (new)
42b (new). Expresses deep concern at the occurrence of violations of human rights in the world against persons on the grounds of their sexual orientation and condemns any act of violence against them; strongly regrets that in many countries homosexuality is still considered a crime punishable by imprisonment and in some cases even by death; welcomes, in this regard, the decision of the Delhi High Court of 2 July 2009 that decriminalised homosexuality in India and calls on other countries to follow its example;
Amendment 220 #
2010/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
Paragraph 47
47. Deeply deplores the fact that some 215 million children are estimated to be victims of child labour, of whom three quarters perform the worst forms of child labour (ILO figures, 2009); welcomes the EU Council conclusions of 14 June 2010 on child labour and the related study of the Commission (SEC(2010) 37 final) calling for a comprehensive EU policy approach that focuses on development and poverty eradication; calls on the Commission to ensure effective monitoring of progress in this field and to encourage along with the EU member states implementation in dialogues with third countries;
Amendment 221 #
2010/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48a (new)
Paragraph 48a (new)
Amendment 385 #
2010/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 81a (new)
Paragraph 81a (new)
81a (new). Welcomes the efforts of the government of Mexico in the fight against drug trafficking and organized crime; regrets, however, the fact that the bill regarding military jurisdiction has not yet been submitted to Congress, in order to reform the Code of Military Justice that does not ensure accountability of military officials implicated in human rights violations; stresses that the EU – Mexico Strategic Partnership should be seen as an opportunity to reinforce human rights and democracy and expresses deep concern about the infringement of human rights as a consequence of the increased security measures intended to combat threats to peace and prosperity;
Amendment 7 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU should further develop its foreign policy objectives and advance its values and interests worldwide with the overall aim of contributing to peace, democracy, rule of law, security, solidarity, the protection of human rights, inclusive multilateralism and mutual respect among nations, free and fair trade and the eradication of poverty,
Amendment 28 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas parliamentary scrutiny of EU foreign policy is essential if European external actions are to be understood and supported by EU citizens; whereas the scrutiny enhances the legitimacy of this action; whereas the organisation and promotion of effective and regular inter- parliamentary cooperation within the EU must be jointly determined by the European Parliament and national parliaments, in accordance with Articles 9 and 10 of Protocol 1 to the Lisbon Treaty,
Amendment 49 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Expects the EEAS, by promoting closer coordination between the CFSP and the external policies of the Member States, to help strengthen the EU's role and influence on the global stage and enable it to project its interests and values more efficiently, in a manner commensurate with its existing international trade and economic status;
Amendment 73 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Emphasises the need for optimal coordination between EU disaster responses and other EU instruments – such as CSDP civilian or military missions – which are already being deployed on the ground or which could be set up in the aftermath of a crisis; believestakes the view that a rigid distinction between military and civilian crisis-management operations reflects rather outdated institutional patterns rather thanand that civil-military interaction and cooperation can better respond to the realityies on the ground, and therefore emphasises the fact that responses to crises require a; emphasises, therefore, the need for a systematic case- by-case evaluation of the needs in order to ensure the most appropriate combination of military and civilian instruments in any given situation;
Amendment 87 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Considers it an EU strategic priority to strengthen international crisis-management partnerships and enhance dialogue with other major crisis-management actors – such as the UN, NATO, the African Union (AU) and the OSCE – and third countries such as the USA, Turkey, Norway and Canada – and to synchronise actions, shareo synchronise actions, improve early warning, ensure exchange of best practises and information, and pool resources in the fields of peacekeeping and peace- building, including cooperation on crisis management and, in particular, maritime security, and the fight against terrorism under international law;
Amendment 93 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Emphasises the need to prevent the EU from becoming dependent for its energy supplies on third countries, which would undermine the independence of EU foreign policy; recalls the urgent need to address energy challenges by implementing a common European external energy policy, based on the diversification of energy suppliersimportance of consistency and coherence of the EU's external action in the field of energy and stresses that the concept of energy security is fundamentally linked to the security of supply; recalls, therefore, the urgent need to address energy challenges by implementing a common European external energy policy, based on a better coordination of Member States' policies in this field and the diversification of energy suppliers; welcomes the decision of the European Council to invite the Commission to submit by June 2011 a communication on security of supply and international cooperation aimed at further improving the consistency and coherence of the EU's external action in the field of energy; calls, in this regard, on the VP/HR to pursue with determination Parliament's recommendations for the development of a coherent and coordinated policy, in particular by promoting EU cohesion in constructive dialogue with energy suppliers, and especially with Russia and transit countries;
Amendment 105 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Reiterates its position that the EU must strengthen its leadership in the area of global climate governance and further develop ato systematically integrate climate change into all external and development cooperation policies; given that climate change has become a key element of international relations and is increasingly identified as a major threat to international security and stability, supports the dialogue with other key actors, such as the United States, Russia, the emerging powers (China, Brazil, India), Russia, the United States and developing countries, given that climate change has become a key element of international relationand the developing and the most affected countries;
Amendment 131 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Believes that the EU should take advantage ofTakes the view that the adoption of NATO's new Strategic Concept in order tooffers an opportunity for a substantial strengthen itsing of the partnership with NATO, bearing in mind also the development of the EU's foreign, security and defence policies; points to the need to find pragmatic ways of solving the difficulties – in particular the differences between Cyprus and Turkey – which are hampering the development of closer cooperation between the EU and NATO, given the importance of ensuring that existing forces and capabilities which are shared to a large extent by both organisations are used as efficiently as possible; welcomes in this regard the concrete set of proposals presented by the VP/HR to the Secretary General of NATO, aiming at the adoption of an organisation-to-organisation relationship that does not discriminate among NATO allies or EU Member States; considers this approach a positive step forward;
Amendment 160 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Welcomes the fact that the situation in Kosovo remains stable and peaceful, but is concerned at the serious problems and breaches of electoral law which occurred in several municipalities during the recent elections; stresses the importance of fair elections as part of Kosovo's ongoing democratic transition; urges the Government of Kosovond calls on the EU to closely monitor the situation of democracy in Kosovo; urges the Kosovo authorities to improve future electoral processes in order to secure the democratic rights of Kosovoall citizens and to strengthen the country's European perspective; calls for the planned talks between Kosovo and Serbia to start without delay, under the sponsorship of the EU, and stresses that they have vast potential to contribute to stability in Kosovo and to improving the situation for local people, including as regards upholding the rule of law in the north of the country; reiterates the need for the EULEX Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo to ensure that it can function effectively throughout the entire territory of Kosovo, by stepping up its activities in the north of the country, and to enjoy the trust and support of the entire population;
Amendment 207 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Supports the resumption of direct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) and stresses the need for meaningful negotiations to be conducted within a limited time frame and in a climate of mutual trust; recalls that the EU is the largest contributor to the PA and Israel's main trading partner; stresses the need for a two state solution and recognises the right of both to live one next to the other in security, prosperity and peace; welcomes, therefore, the EU Council Conclusions on the Middle East Peace Process of 13 December 2010 and the declared will of the EU to assist the parties to achieve this goal;
Amendment 215 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Remains concerned at the absence in the EU's Mediterranean policy of a clear long-term strategic vision for the development and stabilisation of the region, which is experiencing an increase in political, economic and social crises, despite the creation of; regrets that the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM); had no role in the events and stresses the urgent need for the Euro-Mediterranean integration process to become a political priority for the EU with a view to support democratisation and promote respect for Human Rights in all countries of the Mediterranean region;
Amendment 248 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Expresses its satisfaction at the intensification of sectoral dialogues with China and calls for concerted joint work on the controversial issues highlighted at the recent EU-China Summit; regrets, however, that progress towards better economic and judicial governance is not reflected in a willingness to tackle the continuing severe and systematic violations of human rights in the country; points out that relations with Japan, a country which shares the EU's democratic values and concern for human rights, remain extremely important both in economic terms and as regards working together in multinational fora and that the current focus on China must not overshadow the necessary efforts to step up cooperation with Japan and remove the remaining barriers to economic interpenetration;
Amendment 253 #
2010/2124(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39a. Points out that relations with Japan, a country which shares the EU's democratic values and concern for human rights, remain extremely important both in economic terms and as regards working together in multinational fora; stresses the need for further efforts to step up cooperation with Japan and to remove the remaining barriers to economic interpenetration;
Amendment 2 #
2010/2108(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Approves the Commission’s commitment to complete the internal energy market, while respecting the right of Member States to implement their energy mix using available fossil, nuclear and renewable energies in compliance with the imperatives of sustainability, competitiveness, and security of supplin compliance with the imperatives of sustainability, environmental protection, combating climate change, competitiveness, and security of supply; also considers that completing the internal market should not be undertaken at the expense of citizens, particularly the more vulnerable sectors, and at the same time is concerned to combat energy poverty;
Amendment 9 #
2010/2108(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers that energy efficiency should be promoted at international level and should become a global priority; it should therefore be incorporated into the EU’s future energy strategy policy and into development and international trade policies;
Amendment 12 #
2010/2108(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to step up through trade agreements adoption of EU compatible safety and energy-efficiency rules for generation, transmission, transit, storage and processing/refining of energy imports, and to initiate at WTO level global standards to boost open and fair trade in safrenewable energy sources and newinnovative energy technologies;
Amendment 2 #
2010/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Earth’s temperature has already increased over the last century and will continue to increase and whereas the economic, social and ecological repercussions of global warming are assuming worrying proportions and it is vital to limit this warming to less than 2°C,
Amendment 10 #
2010/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the Cancun Summit provides a unique opportunity for a substantive dialogue and should be a key step towards an operational agreement in helping to keep global warming well below 2°C, and should quickly become binding,
Amendment 25 #
2010/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Takes the view that the Commission should follow a harmonised framework in its negotiating strategies in respect of trade and environmental policy, so as not to give partners any cause for concern about trade barriers, while at the same time ensuring compliance with its binding targets for combating climate change;
Amendment 28 #
2010/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Takes the view that the transfer of technology with the purpose of combating climate change is sometimes hindered owing to concerns about the protection of intellectual property rights due to weak political institutions and the absence of the rule of law;
Amendment 3 #
2010/2087(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the Black Sea Synergy (BSS) initiative, presented in 2007, did provide new impetus to regional cooperation in the Black Sea region and should help create greater confidence between the countries of the region and remove some obstacles, but deplores the fact that the administrative and fiscal resources allocated for its implementation have been insufficient; considers that EU regional initiatives should not be duplicated and that the strategy for the Black Sea should not be overshadowed by similar regional initiatives; recommends that all partners in the Black Sea region should be included in a future Black Sea Strategy;
Amendment 7 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Β
Recital Β
Β. whereas the Black Sea region is of strategic importance for the EU; whereas the Black Sea is partially internal to the EU, which results in shared challenges and opportunities for the EU and the countries of the region, as well as in a common need to ensure there is an area of peace, stability and sustainable prosperity around the Black Sea; whereas a more cohesive, sustainable and strategic approach is necessary in the Black Sea region,
Amendment 12 #
2010/2087(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the project-based approach under the BSS, notably the Environment Partnership, and considers that even though the planned partnerships on transport and energy are crucial, they are not progressing fast enough for sustainable development in the region; considers that green development should be further prioritised and that greater efforts should be focused on renewable sources of energy and energy efficiency, which can drive market incentives and long-term investment, should be further prioritised; takes the view that the Black Sea Ring Highway and the Motorways of the Sea would considerably increase the opportunities for trade and development in the region; underlines, however, the need for thorough environmental impact assessments and improved marine safety; time surveillance cooperation in order to ensure the safety of maritime transport and environmental protection;
Amendment 18 #
2010/2087(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that the increased number of WTO member states in the region, where all but two states are now members, positively contributes to the establishment of a predictable and stable trade regime; recommends that the Black Sea countries continue the adjustment of national legislation to WTO rules and multilateral trade principles, including EU trade-related acquis; invites them to step up the gradual elimination of trade barriers with the aim of further trade liberalisation, includingthrough simplification of customs procedures and tax regimes; considers that enhanced cooperation at parliamentary level, both bilaterally and with the Parliamentary Assembly of the BSEC, PABSEC and the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO, would further benefit the process.
Amendment 64 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that two main objectives should be pursued in the EU Strategy for the Black Sea Region: establishing peace and stability in the Black Sea area and providing for EU energy security; considers that good governance, the rule of law, promotion of respect of human rights, energy, transport, environment, and economic and social development should constitute priority actions;
Amendment 75 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that the EU can and should play a bigger role in shaping the Black Sea security environment; calls for an enhanced EU involvement in the regional strategic dialogue, and cooperation with its strategic partners on security issues, as well as in conflict prevention and resolution in conformity with international law and the principles of territorial integrity; calls for cross-border crime , humand trafficking and illegal immigration to be tackled in the Black Sea Strategy, as well as for a further strengthening of cooperation on border and movement management;
Amendment 92 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses the vital importance of establishing and developing good neighbourly relations between the Black Sea countries themselves and with nearby countries based on mutual respect, territorial integrity and a ban on the use or threat of violence;
Amendment 97 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses the importance of the Black Sea as a natural resource and expresses its great concern regarding the environmental situation in this region as a result of uncontrolled pollution and numerous ecological disasters;
Amendment 115 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that the economic, social and human development of the region as a whole should be promoted; regards further liberalization of trade and intensification of intra-regional trade as essential to the economic development of the region; stresses the importance for the local populace and for its trading partners of establishing an area of economic opportunity and prosperity in the Black Sea region; stresses the need to combat fraud and corruption so as to make the region more attractive to investors; supports the EU’s Integrated Maritime Policy aimed at the socio-economic development of maritime regions, but regrets that its Black Sea dimension is poorly developed; welcomes the results registered in cooperation on education, research and technology; further encourages the goal of promoting social development, people-to-people contacts and the development of a strong civil society;
Amendment 6 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the EU has committed itself to defining and pursuing common policies and actions to preserve peace, prevent conflicts and strengthen international security, in accordance with the principles of the UN Charter, as well as to consolidate and support democracy, the rule of law, human rights and the principles of international law, and to assist populations facing natural or man- made disasters;
Amendment 9 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that the year 2010 is a benchmark date for both the military and the civilian headline goal of the EU and that a discussion is already underway on their follow-on and on how to bridge the two capability development processes;
Amendment 10 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Underlines that the EU, mainly through its civilian crisis management, offers a distinct contribution to global security, reflecting its core values and principles;
Amendment 12 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that present-day crises and security threats can rarely be considered from a purely military or civilian viewpoint, and that effective responses to these situations and threats need to be able to draw on bothoften require closer cooperation between civilian and military capabilities; recalls that the development of the EU'’s comprehensive approach and of its civilian crisis-management capabilities have been distinctive features of the CSDP and represent its core added value;
Amendment 50 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. On the political-strategic level, welcomes the integration of civilian and military elements within the Crisis Management Planning Directorate (CMPD) as a step in the right direction; emphasises, however, the need to strike a proper balance between civilian and military strategic planning capabilities, in order to exploit to the full the synergies available, while duly respecting the differences between civilian and military roles and their development processes, preserving their distinctive objectives and securing a case-by-case appropriate mixture that has to be reflected also in the human resources allocated to each operation;
Amendment 57 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. In particular, urges the Vice- President/High Representative to address the shortage of staff as regards experts on civilian capability development and to make sure that the CMPD includes a sufficient number of experts from all the priority civilian capability areas, namely human rights, police, justice, civilian administration, civil protection and monitoring;
Amendment 64 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Takes the view that the operational headquarters should be placed alongside the CPCC in order to maximise the benefits of civilian-military coordination, including the pooling of certain functions, and to better promote best practices among EU planners; suggests even that the operational headquarters and the CPCC might be integrated into a joint EU 'Crisis Management Headquarters' that would be responsible for the operational planning and conduct of all EU civilian missions, military operations and Security Sector Reform missions;
Amendment 65 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Emphasises, however, that in no case should the reorganisation of the present structures lead to the absorption of the civilian dimension into the military dimension and underlines that due account needs to be taken of the differences between civilian and military planning and: thate separate chains of command need to be maintained, with a Civilian Operations Commander and a Military Operations Commander placed atretaining their own competences and enjoying the same hierarchical level within the EEAS;
Amendment 105 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Calls on the Commission to further develop the framework for cooperation with NGOs and to promote the use of non-state actors in the Union's conflict prevention and conflict management activities also by including them in the EU training activities;
Amendment 111 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Urges the Member States to reach agreement on expanding the concept of common costs associated with the use of the battlegroups (costs to be financed through the Athena mechanism), or on common funding of the totality of the costs of crisis-management operations carried out by them; takes the view that such an agreement is necessary to make their use politically acceptable and ensure that the Member States on stand-by do not bear a disproportionate burden in a difficult budgetary situation; reminds in this regard that in November 2009 the Council invited the Council General Secretariat (CGS) to elaborate ideas on financing of military operations for discussion at high level in 2010, but no progress was registered so far;
Amendment 114 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Calls for an improved role of the EU Special Representatives - when present in the area of crisis - in the civilian-military coordination efforts, also with the view of securing closer political oversight of military actions;
Amendment 144 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 b (new)
Paragraph 41 b (new)
41b. EU-OSCE-African Union underlines the need for closer EU-OSCE and EU-AU cooperation in their particular operational areas, improving early warning and ensuring exchange of best practises and expertise in crisis management;
Amendment 145 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Points out that, since 21 out of 28 NATO members are EU Member States, close cooperation between the EU and NATO in the area of military capabilities is of vital importance to avoid duplication of effort when the two organisations operate in the same theatre, this without prejudice for the independent development of EU capabilities and with due respect for the neutrality status of some EU member States; reiterates the urgent need to resolve the underlying political problems hampering EU-NATO cooperation and calls for the improvement of the 'Berlin Plus' arrangements in order to enable the two organisations to intervene effectively in current and future crises;
Amendment 154 #
2010/2071(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
Paragraph 43
43. Takes the view that, when adopting its new Strategic Concept, NATO should not embark onnote of the idea that NATO developings its own civilian capabilities, but that it should be able to rely on those of the EU, in order to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort and suggests to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort establishing an EU-NATO partnership for civilian-military cooperation in the framework of which the EU and its member states could offer civilian capabilities;
Amendment 2 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
Citation 4
– having regard to the statement of EU High Representative Catherine Ashton (hereafter referred to as the High Representative) of 24 September 2010 on "outrageous and unacceptable" remarks made by the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at the UN General AssemblyEU Declaration on non-proliferation adopted during the Thessaloniki European Council of 19-20 June 2003 and the EU strategy against proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction of 10 December 2003,
Amendment 7 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8
Citation 8
– having regard to the Statement of the spokesperson of the High Representative of 16 July 2010 on the attacksCouncil Conclusions of 22 March 2010 on free access to information in Iran,
Amendment 12 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
Citation 16
– having regard to the Vienna Group proposal for transferring Iranian uranium to Russia and France and to the bridging proposal sponsored by the governments of Turkey and Brazil in an attempt to delay the passage of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1929 (2010),
Amendment 22 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Islamic Republic of Iran (hereafter referred to as Iran) is facing an array of governance challenges - from power struggles between competing factions within the country’s ruling elites to a crippling social and economic malaise,an important country in its region and the EU has an interest in developing a coherent strategy towards the country, in order to engage it in a more constructive a pproblematic regional security environment and rising popular discontent at home - many of which are products of the Iranian regime’s own makingach towards regional policies, human rights and nuclear energy issues,
Amendment 28 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas since the controversial June 2009 presidential elections the reformisthe EU has repeatedly stressed its hgrave become most commonly identified with the Green Movement, the popular, grass-roots social movement that took shape during the mass protests against President Ahmadinejad's re- electionconcern over the human rights situation in the country; whereas this situation has been aggravated since the controversial presidential elections of June 2009,
Amendment 31 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 51 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas Iran hasuffers pfroblematic relations with almost all its neighbours; whereas especially Israel and the Gulf region fem a lack of credibility due to its suspicious nuclear programme; whereas a number of countries feel threatened by it, while at the same time Iran finds itself intimidated by Iran's aggressive rhetoricsolated because of it; whereas, therefore, Iran's re-engagement with the international community and wits ongoing nuclear programmeh the IAEA would be beneficial to Iran and to the whole region,
Amendment 57 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
Amendment 74 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that popular discontent and disenchantment with the Iranian government as a result of the graveNotes with concern the internal political situation, in particular as far as regards democracy, the worsened socio- economic situation combined with an absenceof the people, the lack of liberty and basic respect for human dignity within Iran represent the fundamental humain challenge to the regime’s survivalrights;
Amendment 78 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that although President Ahmadinejad was elected in 2005 on a platform of social justice and economic populism, Iran’s domestic problems have continued to deteriorate draises those who fight for social justice, human rights and democracy and reiteratesp ite burgeoning oil prices; deplores, therefore, Ahmadinejad’s aim of shoring up his political position at home by embracing a radical international agenda with the expectation that a stridently anti-Western, anti-Israel stance will enhance Iran’s leadership position in the Muslim worls call on Iran to ensure the right of freedom of expression, as set out in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights that Iran has signed and ratified;
Amendment 96 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Warns that the IRGC is slowly taking over Iran; indicates that despite ideological congruity between Supreme Leader Khamenei and the IRGC leadership, the development of the IRGC into a state within a state is turning Khamenei into a hostage in the hands of his own Praetorian GuardCondemns the oppressive action and brutal methods of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC); recognises and praises the courage of those Revolutionary Guards who defied orders to open fire against protesters, though they were severely punished, expelled from the force and sent to prison; calls on the Iranian Government to treat them with fairness and to release them immediately, together with other political prisoners;
Amendment 107 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Urges the EU institutions to address the serious fact that the IRGC and its 'front companies' have been involved in scandals that point to the militarization rather than the privatisation of Iran’s economy; stresses that this so-called 'privatisation' is enabling the Iranian leadership to transfer ownership from relatively transparent parts of the public sector to parts shielded from public scrutinyo what extent the worsened socio- economic situation in Iran is due to the imposition of sanctions; stresses that sanctions have to be targeted and not harm the Iranian people; expresses its disappointment, in this regard, that a new US law has provided for a ban on Iranian rug importation as of 29 September 2010;
Amendment 153 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of Iran's "blogosphere" for a better European understanding of the dynamics at play within the Iranian political system, and therefore strongly encourages European media outlets to create a consortium of trusted Iranian bloggers to report regularly on events in Iran, and thus facilitate the analysis of their long-term implithe domestic dialogue and as part of freedom of expression regardless of state frontiers; expresses, therefore, its grave concern over measures taken by the Iranian authorities with the aim of preventing its citizens from freely communicating and exchanging information through the internet, as well as radio satellite broadcastions, with full EU-backingng, TV and mobile phones;
Amendment 176 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Expects the Council and the Commission to urge the Iranian authorities to react positively to longstanding requests by several UN Special Rapporteurs (e.g. Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions; Torture; Freedom of Religion or Belief; Independence of Judges and Lawyers) for official visits to Iran; considers that the acceptance of these requests, as well as of a renewed dialogue on human rights with the EU, will restore confidence in Iran's willingness to be a responsible part of the international community;
Amendment 178 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Urges the Council and the Commission to demand that the Iranian regime not deter human rights activistsRegrets the fact that the situation of human rights defenders, including human rights lawyers and women’s rights defenders who are being especially targeted, is deteriorating; is deeply concerned by the fact that human rights defenders have suffered various attacks, arbitrary arrests, unfair trials and are being deterred from making use of their constitutional rights;
Amendment 190 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that representatives of EU institutions should include in the programmes of their official visits to Iran meetings with opposition leaders/representatives of the Green Movement and prominent Iranian human rights dissidents; stresses also that official mutual contacts between the delegations of the EP and the Majlis should be conditional on concrete improvements irepresentatives of civil society, political parties and movements, as well as with prominent Iranian human rights defenders;
Amendment 196 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Urges official representativeCalls ofn the EU and its Member States, when meeting their Iranian counterparts, to insistthe High Representative to reinforce actions in support of the exercise onf the re-opening of the many daily newspapers closed down in recent years, as well as the release of political prisoners, by presenting lists of names in both casesight to freedom of expression, association and assembly in Iran, and to ask for the immediate release of all those detained on the grounds of their sexual orientation or their religious belief;
Amendment 199 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Condemns the fact that the Iranian authorities still sentence to death and execute juvenile offenders and civilians on the ground of their sexual orientation, and calls on the Iranian Government to implement immediately the UN moratorium on the death penalty as called for in UN General Assembly Resolutions 62/149 and 63/168; bearing in mind these dangers, reminds the member states of their obligations under the 1951 Geneva Convention on refugees and calls for effective respect of the principle of non-refoulement;
Amendment 207 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Expresses itsReiterates its strong disappointment at the continuing refusal by Iran to fully cooperate with the IAEA by obstructing the IAEA's work, denying access to key nuclear facilities and; urges Iran to provide inspectors with the information and access they need to determine whether the real purpose of Tehran’s programme is purely of civilian nature, to cooperate in a constructive spirit, and to stop vetoing the appointment of inspectors; calls on the Iranian leadership to fulfil Iran's obligations under the NPT; dem ands that Teheran ratify ando implement the Additional Protocol on the Safeguards Agreement, signed by Iran already back in December 2003;
Amendment 222 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Supports the European Council’s twin-track approach aimed at finding a negotiated solution to the nuclear stand-off and commends it on its new Common Position of 26 July 2010 introducing new and far-reaching autonomous measures applicable to Iran until it responds favourably to the international community's offer of constructive engagement and a negotiated solution to the dispute;
Amendment 247 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Rejects fiercely the desire expressed by the Iranian leadership to "wipe out" Israany provocative statements that put in danger stability in the Middle East, as wel;l also fiercely rejects the anti-Semitic rhetoric of the Iranias any idea of military action against any state in the region; stresses Iran's own president, especially his denial of the Holocaust and his underlying agenda of delegitimizing the Israeli state; calls on the EU institutions to safeguard the existence of the Jewish stateponsibility in this process and also expects it to take a more constructive stance in efforts to find a solution to the Palestinian problem;
Amendment 275 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Expresses its concernsTakes note onf the remarkable deepening of relations between Iran and the EU accession candidate Turkey;, asks the Council and the Commission to discuss the Turkish attitude towards Iran with their counterparts in Ankara; calls on the Turkish authorities to follow the European approach towards the well as of the mediation attempt with Brazil; acknowledges the interest of Turkey in maintaining close relations with Iran, as the EU shares the same interest in regional cooperation, peace and stability; stresses that diplomacy remains the best way to resolve the row over Iranian's nuclear threat; calls on the EU institutions to do their utmost to sever the lines between Teheran and Syria, Hezbollah and Hamasprogramme and looks forward to new intensified efforts in this regard;
Amendment 288 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 3 #
2010/2020(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the European Union is committed to multilateral cooperation and the strengthening of the United Nations system; whereas, therefore, the EU should be a driving force in the efforts to reform the organisation and continue to be a firm supporter of its important role in the international system,
Amendment 26 #
2010/2020(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) to establish, in cooperation with the new US administration, a common agenda of short and long-term goals with regard to multilateral issues within the UN framework,
Amendment 33 #
2010/2020(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) to take tangible action and new initiatives in supporting the reform process of the UN system, stressing the need for a comprehensive reform of the Security Council in all its aspects,
Amendment 46 #
2010/2020(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – before point p – title
Paragraph 1 – before point p – title
Nuclear disarmament and non- proliferation, conventional disarmament and arms control, fight against terrorism
Amendment 49 #
2010/2020(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point p
Paragraph 1 – point p
(p) to work coherently, consistently and efficiently with EU Member States towards achieving a successful outcome of the 2010 NPT Review Conference; to commit to the aim of complete nuclear disarmament in line with UN Security Council resolution 1887 endorsing the goal of a nuclear- weapons-free world once the conditions are metand disarmament under strict and effective international control; to deepen its dialogue with all nuclear powers to pursue a common agenda aimed at progressive reduction of the nuclear warheads stockpile whilst improving the means for verification; to support the US administration in its declared commitment to global nuclear disarmament encouraged by President Obama’s vision of a world without nuclear weapons; to urge the ratification and the entry into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT),
Amendment 52 #
2010/2020(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
(pa) to exercise its influence in support of wider disarmament efforts and urge for more practical and effective disarmament measures; to stress the need for full implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), the Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM), and the Anti-Personnel Mines Convention (APMC), underlining at the same time the need for further development of the international regime against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction,
Amendment 53 #
2010/2020(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point p b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point p b (new)
(pb) to underline the need for effective arms control, including small arms and ammunitions containing depleted uranium,
Amendment 60 #
2010/2020(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
(ra) to stress the need for sustainable economic growth and development,
Amendment 3 #
2010/0323(NLE)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the Council has stated in its conclusions on child labour of 14 June 2010 that it is fully aware of the role and responsibilities of the Union in the struggle towards ending child labour,
Amendment 5 #
2010/0323(NLE)
Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas water is an important resource in the 21st century and therefore its preservation should be a priority; whereas the production of cotton in Uzbekistan has caused a severe reduction of the volume of the Aral Sea between 1990 and 2008, due to poor environmental standards and inefficient irrigation infrastructure,
Amendment 8 #
2010/0323(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 point (i)
Paragraph 1 point (i)
(i) Remind the Uzbek authorities that despite the fact that human rights principles are enshrinincluded in the text of the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan and that Uzbekistan has signed and ratified most UN conventions relating to human rights, civil and political rights and rights of the child but that, this formal set of legal acts is far from being implemented in what remains in practice one of the most repressive dictatorships in the world,
Amendment 9 #
2010/0323(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 point (ia) (new)
Paragraph 1 point (ia) (new)
(ia) Outline the importance of democratic and human rights principles in the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement and recall the Union’s commitment to further and deepen bilateral relations with Uzbekistan, which include trade, democratic principles, human and fundamental rights and the rule of law;
Amendment 12 #
2010/0323(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 point (id) (new)
Paragraph 1 point (id) (new)
(id) Strongly condemn the use of forced child labour, and outline the importance of international observers in particular the ILO and UNICEF;
Amendment 15 #
2010/0323(NLE)
Draft opinion
Article 1 point (iia) (new)
Article 1 point (iia) (new)
(iia) Urge the Uzbek President Islam Karimov to allow an ILO monitoring mission into the country to address the issue of child labour practices;
Amendment 21 #
2010/0323(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 point (iig) (new)
Paragraph 1 point (iig) (new)
(iig) Put pressure on the current regime in order to preserve natural resources and the environment;
Amendment 21 #
2010/0282(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) It is important in this connection that the Member StatesCommission determines the system of penaltiadministrative measures applicable in the event of non- compliance with the obligations stemming from this Decision, and that they ensure that those penalties are applied. The penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasivewhile the member states shall determine what penalties are applicable when national provisions enacted pursuant to this Decision are infringed. The member states ensure that those penalties and administrative measures are applied. In all cases, the administrative measures and the penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. When administrative measures or penalties are imposed, the right of appeal for the accused individual or entity should be guaranteed.
Amendment 27 #
Amendment 29 #
2010/0282(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall determine what administrative measures are applicable when the provisions of the present Decision are infringed by any of the PRS participants.
Amendment 31 #
2010/0282(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1 c (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 c (new)
The penalties and administrative measures shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Endangering the security of the system can lead to the lift of access authorisation. When penalties or administrative measures are imposed, the right of appeal for the accused individual or entity shall be guaranteed.
Amendment 30 #
2010/0197(COD)
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
Amendment 46 #
2010/0101(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) SGiven that combating climate change has become a priority, some flexibility on regional allocation under the Climate Change Mandate should be provided to allow for the fastest and most effective possible uptake of available financing within the 3-year period 2011- 2013. In the event that the total amount of financing operations under consideration would exceed the available EUR 2 billion, the Commission and the EIB should strive to ensure a balanced distribution across the regions covered, based on the established priorities for external aid under the General Mandate.
Amendment 52 #
2010/0101(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) EIB activity in Neighbourhood countries should take place in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy, under which the EU aims to develop a special relationship with neighbouring countries with a view to establishing an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness, founded on the values of the EU, such as democracy, the rule of law, good governance and respect for human rights, and characterised by close and peaceful relations based on co- operation. To achieve these objectives the EU and its partners implement jointly agreed bilateral Action Plans defining a set of priorities including on political and security issues, trade and economic matters, environmental concerns and integration of transport and energy networks. The Union for the Mediterranean, the Eastern Partnership, and the Black Sea Synergy are multilateral and regional initiatives complementary to the European Neighbourhood Policy aimed at fostering co-operation between the EU and the respective group of neighbouring partner countries facing common challenges and/or sharing a common geographical environment. The Union for the Mediterranean supports improved socio-economic, solidarity, regional integration, sustainable development and knowledge building, underlining the need to increase financial co-operation to support regional and trans-national projects. The Eastern Partnership aims to create the necessary conditions to accelerate political association and further economic integration between the EU and Eastern Partner countries. The Russian Federation and the EU have a wide-ranging Strategic Partnership, distinct from the European Neighbourhood Policy and expressed through the Common Spaces and Roadmaps. This is complemented at multilateral level by the Northern Dimension which provides a framework for co-operation between the EU, Russia, Norway and Iceland.
Amendment 58 #
2010/0101(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) EIB activity in South Africa should take place in the framework of the EU- South Africa Country Strategy Paper. The focal areas identified in the Strategy Paper are employment creation and capacity development for service delivery and social cohesion. EIB activities in South Africa have taken place in high complementarity with the Commission's development cooperation programme, namely through the EIB focus on private sector support and investments in expansion of infrastructure and social services (housing, electric power, drinking water purification projects and municipal infrastructure). The Mid- Term Review of the Country Strategy Paper for South Africa has proposed the strengthening of actions in the area of climate change through activities supporting the creation of green jobs.
Amendment 76 #
2010/0101(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall develop, together with the EIB, regional operational guidelines for EIB financing under this decision. In drawing up these guidelines the Commission and the EIB will consult with the European External Action Service (EEAS) on policy issues, as appropriate. The operational guidelines aim to ensure that EIB financing supports EU policies, and shall take as a starting point the wider EU regional policy framework set by the Commission and the EEAS, as appropriate. Notably, the operational guidelines will ensure that EIB financing is complementary to corresponding EU assistance policies, programmes and instruments in the different regions, taking into account European Parliament resolutions and Council decisions and conclusions. The Commission will inform the European Parliament and the Council in advance of the guidelines that are being established. Within the framework set out by the operational guidelines, the EIB shall define corresponding financing strategies and ensure their implementation.
Amendment 81 #
2010/0101(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The consistency of EIB external actions with the external policy objectives of the EU shall be strengthened, with a view to maximising synergies between EIB financing and EU budgetary resources, in particular through the establishment of the operational guidelines referred to in Article 5, of which the European Parliament shall be informed in advance, as well as through regular and systematic dialogue and early exchange of information on:
Amendment 86 #
2010/0101(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the West Bank and Gaza Strip is represented by the Palestinian Authority and Kosovo under United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) by the United Nations Mission in Kosovo or an administration designated in the guidelines referred to under Article 5 of this Decision.
Amendment 90 #
2010/0101(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
The EIB and the Commission shall enter into a guarantee agreement laying down the detailed provisions and procedures relating to the EU guarantee and shall inform the European Parliament thereof.
Amendment 23 #
2010/0039(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the "Charter"), notably human dignity, prohibition of torture and of inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, right to liberty and security, the rights to the protection of personal data, right to asylum, non-refoulement, non discrimination, the rights of the child and right to an effective remedy. This Regulation endorses the provisions and the aims of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted1, as well as of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third- country nationals2. This Regulation should be applied by the Member States in accordance with these rights and principles. ___________________ 1 OJ L...... 2 OJ L......
Amendment 63 #
2010/0039(COD)
Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
4. The Agency may benefit from Union funding in accordance with the provisions of the relevant instruments supporting the Union's external relations policy. It may launch and finance technical assistance projects in third countries regarding matters covered by this Regulation with a view to improving their capacities, inter alia in the field of human rights. The Agency may also invite representatives of third countries, other European Union agencies and bodies or international organisations to participate in its activities referred to in Articles 3, 4 and 5. These representatives shall receive the appropriate training from the Agency prior to their participation.
Amendment 4 #
2009/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that fish is a natural resource which, under proper managementn important and irreplaceable natural resource which, if prompt action is taken at international level, can be renewable and provide both food and jobs around the world, but that overfishing has led to depletion of fish stocks and hardship in coastal communities; recognises that international trade has often led to overfishing as countries seek to export their natural resources, as for example in the case of bluefin tuna; considers it advisable to carry out a criteria-based assessment of fisheries agreements with third countries to ensure a balance between economic interests and sustainable fishing;
Amendment 7 #
2009/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to analyse the impact and repercussions on the European market of the import of substitutes from third countries, taken from non-environmentally sustainable resources, to make up for market shortages;
Amendment 18 #
2009/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises the need for all imports to to guarantee the traceability of imported products and ensure that they meet the sametrict health standards as fish caught by EU fle, environmental and social standards that are imposed on EU producers in order to ensure equal treatment on the markets;
Amendment 22 #
2009/2238(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Supports the EU regulation on illegal fishing, which seeks to prevent entry onto the EU market of fish that have been caught illegally and that represent a form of unfair competition that seriously harms all EU fishermen, while acknowledging the need of many developing countries for help with implementing the regulation properly and combating illegal fishing.
Amendment 4 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7
Citation 7
– having regard to the (forthcoming) "Kabul Conference" scheduled for of 20 July 2010, which will assess progress in implementing decisions taken at the London Conference, and will provide an opportas a further step in the Kabul Process and marked a new phase in the partnership between the Afghan Government and the international community forwith the Afghan Government to chart the way forward, notably on anti- corruption, reinforcedaim of accelerating Afghan leadership and ownership, strengthening international and regional cooperation, improving governance and the rule of law, promoting and protecting the rights of all Afghan citizens, with specurity, good governance, economic and social development, human rights, gender equality, economic growth, and improved electoral processesial regard to women and children, delivering economic and social development; enhancing the capabilities of Afghan security forces, and combating drug production and trafficking,
Amendment 17 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the international community has implicitly recognised tharepeatedly reaffirmed its support for the relevant Unine years of war and international involvement have not succeeded in eliminating the Taliban insurgency and bringing peace and stability to the countryted Nations Security Council Resolutions upholding the security, prosperity and human rights of all Afghan citizens and the ultimate goal of bringing peace and stability to the country; whereas, however, after nine years of war and international involvement, the Taliban insurgency continues to represent a major challenge,
Amendment 33 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas security conditions have deteriorated, along with the popular consensus the coalition'’s presence enjoyed at one stage; whereas a new broader partnership with the people of Afghanistan is needed, involving unrepresented groups and civil society in peace and reconciliation efforts,
Amendment 40 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Recital C c (new)
C c. whereas the EU is one of the major donors of development assistance and humanitarian aid to Afghanistan; whereas it is a committed partner in reconstruction and stabilisation efforts,
Amendment 48 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas, with regard to the EU aid contribution to Afghanistan, Carl Bildt, in his capacity as Council President, stated before Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs in December 2009 that "We have no idea what the Union as a collectivity is doing in Afghanistan... We are spending more than a billion euros a year..., virtually uncoordinated" the lack of sufficient coordination undermines the effectiveness of EU aid contributions to Afghanistan,
Amendment 51 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas the situation of women in the country remains a matter of great concern; whereas, according to UN reporting, Afghanistan's maternal mortality rate is the second highest in the world with nearly 25 000 deaths per year, only 12.6% of women over the age of 15 able to read and write, and 57% of girls married off below the legal age of 16; whereas violence against women continues to be a widespread phenomenon; whereas the discriminatory Shia Personal Status Law is still in place and, amongst other points, criminalises women for denying sexual intercourse to their husbands or forbids women from leaving the house without their husband's consent,
Amendment 53 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Recital F b (new)
F b. whereas Afghanistan is a party to several international conventions protecting women's and children's rights, and notably the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women of 1979 and the International Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989, and whereas the Afghan Constitution, and its article 22 in particular, stipulates that "the citizens of Afghanistan, men and women, have equal rights and duties before the law"; whereas the Afghan Family Code is currently under revision in order to harmonize it with the Constitution,
Amendment 55 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas it has become obvious that no military solution is possible in Afghanistan, and whereas the US has stated that it will start to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan in summer 2011; whereas, and other countries have either already withdrawn or are making plans to do so imminently; whereas, however, the withdrawal of the military has to be a gradual and coordinated procedure in the framework of a political project that guarantees a smooth transition of responsibility to the Afghan security forces,
Amendment 86 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that any long-term solution to the Afghan crisis will involve the elimination of poverty,should include concrete measures for the eradication of poverty, reconciliation mechanisms, the respect for human rights, the involvement of the various ethnic and religious groups in the political life of the country, the promotion of regional cooperation for development, putting an end to opium production, and the full integration of Afghanistan into the international community;
Amendment 109 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. IDespite improvements in women's lives since the end of the Taliban rule in 2001, is concerned about the deterioration inof women's fundamental political and civil rights in Afghanistan, as well as by in the last few years, and expresses its concern about negative developments such as the fact that the majority of prisoners in Afghan jails are women escaping oppressive relatives, and about the recent changes to the electoral code which weaken the quotas for seats in parliament for women;
Amendment 118 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls on the Commission, the Council and EU Member States to continue to raise the issue of discrimination against women and children, as well as of human rights in general, in bilateral relations with Afghanistan, in line with the EU's long-term commitment to assisting Afghanistan in peace and reconstruction efforts;
Amendment 119 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the EU and the international community to increase the level of funding and support for Afghan women and women's organisationpolitical and technical support for policies to improve Afghan women's situation and for women's organisations, including women's rights defenders;
Amendment 169 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Takes the view that the Afghan authorities should be responsible for civilian projects, such as the building of schools and hospitals; welcomes, in this regard, the reiterated strong support of participants at the Kabul Conference for planning to channel, in line with the London Conference communiqué, at least 50% of development aid through the Afghan Government's core budget within two years, while, as also committed to at the London Conference, the Afghan Government achieves the necessary reforms to strengthen its public financial management systems, reduce corruption, improve budget execution, and increase revenue collection to finance key National Priority Programmes;
Amendment 235 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Recognises that the only possible solution is a political one, and thatexit from the current impasse is a political agreement to be achieved through negotiations with the Taliban –, which should take place against the backdrop of a ceasefire – lie at the heart of this process, with the, involve Pashtun elements, and aim tof forming a government of national unity, which can put an end to the civil war that has raged in the country for almost three decades as well as ensure full respect for fundamental human rights;
Amendment 243 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Firmly believes that the EU's three main prerequisites for thesuch a peace process must be an Afghan commitment by all parties involved in negotiations to banishing Al Qaeda as well as any other terrorist group from the country, theo take action to elimination ofe poppy cultivation, and the will to establish respect for fundamental human rights;
Amendment 263 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 b (new)
Paragraph 37 b (new)
37 b. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the strategic and political implications of the recent disastrous Pakistan floods for Afghanistan and the broader region, and to take every necessary step to assist the affected population of the country and the Afghan refugees whose camps were overwhelmed by flooding;
Amendment 264 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 c (new)
Paragraph 37 c (new)
37 c. Stresses the importance of good water management in and around Afghanistan and highlights the benefits of regional and cross-border cooperation in this field, also in terms of confidence- building among neighbours in Southwest Asia;
Amendment 289 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Urges the EU and its Member States to encourage the US to move away from its policy of circumventing domestic institutions in the delivery of international aid and the privatisation of security, as well as its parallel and seemingly contradictory (to the peace process) attempt to "‘decapitate"’ the insurgency leadership using drones and, US Special forces and local militias, which isare of questionable legal status and, results in frequent civilian casualties, and discredit the international intervention;
Amendment 306 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Subheading 4
Police trainingand security forces and the rule of law
Amendment 314 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
Paragraph 47
47. Stresses that Afghanistan must be provided with an efficient police force capable of ensuring a minimal standard ofand an autonomous army capable of ensuring security able to permit a subsequent withdrawal of the foreign military presence from the country;
Amendment 316 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
Paragraph 48
48. Draws attention to the many different police training missions presRecognising, however, that having self-sustaining security forces is rather a long term goal; draws particular attent ion to the ground, and to the funding being invested in police training, with little to show for itneed for a more coordinated and integrated approach in the training of police, as well as, in a separate manner, in the training of army officers;
Amendment 349 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 55
Paragraph 55
55. Proposes that a large-scale training programme be launched and placCalls for coordinated, in the first instance, under NATO command, and that EUPOL and national police mission staff be integrated into this new training mission, thereby eliminating duplication, waste and fragmentationternational efforts to significantly increase police training capacities and further improve the effectiveness of training programmes, based on an improved cooperation and coordination between the various actors;
Amendment 4 #
2009/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the geopolitical situation of Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan in relation to Russia, Iran and Turkey, and considers it therefore of the utmost importance that cooperation with the South Caucasus be given the highest priority, not least in matters relating to energy with a view to the economic and commercial development of the region and in order to promote energy security;
Amendment 8 #
2009/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that trade is one of the key components of the EU’s overall policy of fostering political stability, sustainable growth and prosperity in the Eastern Partnership countries in general and in the South Caucasus region in particular and that open markets and economic integration are of fundamental importance for the development of the partners and for their confidence in an expanding partnership with the EU;
Amendment 17 #
2009/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the conclusion of the feasibility studies for Georgia and Armenia in May 2008, showing that deep and comprehensive free trade agreements (DCFTAs) would bring significant economic benefits to these countries and the EU, thereby allowing the Commission to enter into a preparatory phase for future negotiations on DCFTAs; calls on Azerbaijan to accomplish its accession to the WTO, removing the obstacles relating to lack of transparency, corruption and failure to implement legislative provisions on trade, as soon as possible, as WTO membership is a prerequisite before any FTA negotiations can be considered; encourages Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan to improve their progress in fulfilling their respective ENP Action Plans and the Commission’s recommendations, particularly in terms of improving their institutional capacity and implementation of regulatory reforms (especially regarding the poor levels of intellectual property protection in all three countries), which is one of the necessary preconditions for effective implementation and sustaining the effects of such ambitious FTAs;
Amendment 91 #
2009/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission to explore the possibility of providing humanitarian aid and assistance to the region of Nagorno-Karabakh in the form of confidence-building measures and economic rehabilitation plans with a view to a peaceful settlement of the conflict in that region;
Amendment 107 #
2009/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the protocols on the establishment of diplomatic relations, border opening and cooperation; stresses that it will help to consolidate peace and security in the wider region; calls on both sides to seize this opportunity to mend their relations through ratification and implementation; does not support the introduction of conditions for ratification not mentioned in the protocols, but notes that if implemented, they will have wide- ranging, potentially overall very positive consequences in the region and that they can therefore not be seen in isolation; stresses that the longer Armenia continues to be geographically isolated, the more difficult its economic situation will be; calls on Armenia, as well as Azerbaijan, to intensify their efforts in the Minsk Co- chairs-led talks on the principles for a settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict;
Amendment 140 #
2009/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses that a clear commitment by Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia to respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms is of crucial importance for their future relations with the EU;
Amendment 175 #
2009/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Considers freedom of expression to be a fundamental right and principle and the role of the media essential, is disturbed by the limitations on freedom of expression and the lack of media pluralism in the countries of the South Caucasus and calls on the authorities to ensure both; is preoccupied about attacks on journalists in Armenia and in particular about the continued detention of opposition journalist Nikol Pashinian, despite the welcomed amnesty of 18 June 2009 leading to the release of a number of imprisoned opposition activists; is profoundly concerned about the deterioration of the media climate in Azerbaijan with cases of harassment and intimidation of media professionals and deplores the detention and sentencing of the two youth activists and bloggers, Emin Milli and Adnan Hajizade; accordingly calls for their immediate release following the appeal procedure in accordance with international standards and with respect for the principles of a fair trial as set out in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights;
Amendment 207 #
2009/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Notes the strategic geopolitical location of the South Caucasus and its increasing importance as an energy, transport and communications corridor connecting the Caspian region and Central Asia with Europe; regrets the agreement between Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan concerning the rail link which by-passes Armenia and has a direct impact on the cost of transporting exports;
Amendment 220 #
2009/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Underscores the importance of investing in renewable energy sources and ensuring that environmental concerns are catered for; welcomes the establishment of the Regional Environmental Centre for the Caucasus; considers the plans proclaimed by Azerbaijan to make the development of alternative energy sources a government priority praiseworthy and encourages the pursuit of such objectives; is glad to take note of the decision of Armenia to decommission the nuclear plant in Medzamor, but regretsis concerned that a new nuclear plant will be built in the same seismic area; encourages the Armenian authorities to seek alternative solutions for energy supplies;
Amendment 286 #
2009/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Considers that the EU should continue to support economic development, trade and investment in the region, and that trade policy is a fundamental factor in political stability and economic development and will lead to a reduction in poverty in the South Caucasus; believes that the negotiation and establishment of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements plays a very important role in this respect; calls on the Commission to consider possible ways to assist the countries in the region to prepare them and enable them to negotiate and then implement and sustain the commitments provided for in possible future FTAs;
Amendment 1 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
- having regard to the conclusions of Second Euro-Mediterranean Ministerial Conference on Strengthening the Role of Women in Society, held in Marrakesh on 11 and 12 November 2009;
Amendment 1 #
2009/2215(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 1
Point 1
1. Points out that the aims of the UfMUfM will contribute towards peace and prosperity and that it constitutes a step towards economic and regional integration, and that its aims are to construct a balanced Euro- Mediterranean partnership, to set up specific projects involving the whole of the region and thereby to help to create a favourable climate for conflict resolution,
Amendment 6 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas, in a multipolar world, only large regional blocs will be in a position to play a leading role and to cope with social, cultural, economic, environmental and political change the Mediterranean basin is an area of key importance for the EU and the UfM partners,
Amendment 8 #
2009/2215(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 2 a (new)
Point 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that the goal of the economic and commercial initiatives of the UfM is to create a mutually beneficial Euro- Mediterranean free trade area, and they should favour the economic growth of the region and improved integration into the world economy,
Amendment 12 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the UfM builds on the positive elements of the Barcelona Process with the aim of a even closer cooperation that should bring concrete benefits for the citizens of the region,
Amendment 18 #
2009/2215(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 5
Point 5
5. Stresses the vital need to develop South- South trade, which accounts for just 6% of world trade, and thus to take action to extend the Agadir Agreement; calls further on the relevant EU institutions to provide the necessary technical support to promote South-South economic integration,
Amendment 23 #
2009/2215(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 6
Point 6
6. Hopes for an improvement in the economic and legal environment in the region, an essential guarantee for future investment; insists on the objective of favouring the development of human resources and employment in line with the Millennium Development Goals for fighting poverty,
Amendment 38 #
2009/2215(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 9
Point 9
9. URecognises the importance of strengthening cooperation in the field of energy between the Euro-Mediterranean partners and the need to develop a regional energy market, with a view to the implementation of large-scale renewable energy and energy infrastructure projects in the Mediterranean region; urges that sustainable energy and development policies such as the Desertec project should be geared first and foremost to the region and thus contribute to its development,
Amendment 44 #
2009/2215(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 11
Point 11
11. Urges the Commission to keep up its demands for democracy from Libya, human rights and the rule of law vis-à-vis all countries in the region in its trade negotiations,
Amendment 47 #
2009/2215(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 12
Point 12
12. Calls on the Commission to contribute towards regional stability and crisis prevention. in order to create an area of peace and prosperity in the Mediterranean,
Amendment 80 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. welcomes the establishment of the Secretariat of Union of the Mediterranean and the appointment of the Secretary- General; expects to see it fully operative at the earliest possible date and takes the view that merit should be the decisive criteria for the selection of its staff, with due attention for the principle of geographical distribution and gender equality;
Amendment 96 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is of the opinionreiterates its call for immediate resumption of meaningful negotiations that should lead to a comprehensive peace in the Middle East; is of the opinion that the UfM can be a confidence-building and trust multiplier, facilitating political dialogue and contributing to the wider respect of the international law in the region; stresses, however, that political tensions and regional conflicts in the Mediterranean basin must not hinder tangible progress towards multilateral cooperation in specific sectors, and that it is through the implementation of major integration and development projects that the UfM will help to develop a climate of trust conducive to pursuing common security goals in a spirit of solidarity and peace;
Amendment 128 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the Paris Summit identified six main horizontal strategic sectors (civil protection, maritime and land highways, de-pollution of the Mediterranean, the Mediterranean solar energy plan, the Mediterranean Business Development Initiative and the Euro-Mediterranean University), in most of which projects are already under wayadopted as part of the EuroMed partnership; underlines that the project- oriented approach constitutes the added value of the UfM; urges, therefore, the implementation of these priority projects;
Amendment 131 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. reaffirms its support for the environmental dimension of the UfM and the related initiatives and projects, such as the Euro-Mediterranean initiative for the de-pollution of the Mediterranean and the Mediterranean Plan for Solar Energy; welcomes, in this regard, the launch of the second phase of the Mediterranean Hot- Spot Investment Programme - Project Preparation and Implementation Facility (MeHSIP PPIF) and expects tangible results from the two conferences on the Mediterranean Solar Plan to be held in Valencia in May 2010;
Amendment 221 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Amendment 4 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8
Citation 8
Amendment 6 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 (new)
Citation 13 (new)
having regard to the Council Conclusions of 11 December 2006,
Amendment 22 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes Turkey’s potential for further economic development, given its young and dynamic population; encourages both the EU and Turkey to pay due attention to their interlinked economies, and calls on Turkey to pursue further openness, and to refrain from hidden protectionism and to capitalise more on Turkey’s geo-political position when setting trade targets;
Amendment 40 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 43 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Regrets that Turkey has not fully implemented the Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement or removed all the obstacles to the free movement of goods;
Amendment 44 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10c. Reiterates that Turkey’s full compliance with its undertakings under the customs union is essential; considers also that there is a need for further harmonisation with the Community acquis in certain sectors such as free trade zones and customs duty relief;
Amendment 47 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Encourages the Commission and Turkey to remove all technical barriers to trade, such as recognition of certification, duplicative testing, multiple inspections, technical regulations and standards;
Amendment 51 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 76 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Notes that Turkey and the EU face similar challenges in energy supply; stresses the need to define a common external energy strategy; urges Turkey to ratify the Energy Charter Treaty Trade Amendment; encourages Turkey to invest in the enormous potential of its renewable energy sources;
Amendment 78 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 82 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Regrets that the legislation ensuring full respect for trade union rights in line with EU standards and the relevant International Labour Organisation conventions has not yet been completed, particularly with regard to the rights of trade union organisation and collective bargaining and the right to strike;
Amendment 91 #
2009/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Stresses that counterfeit products represent a major problem in EU-Turkey trade relations and reduce the attractiveness of Turkey for FDI; welcomes the adoption of new IPR legislation in Turkey with effective enforcementconsiders that the progress that has been made on the protection of intellectual property is negligible and urges Turkey to enact harmonised and up-to-date legislation on intellectual and industrial property rights;
Amendment 3 #
2009/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation -1 (new)
Citation -1 (new)
– having regard to the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenants on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;
Amendment 7 #
2009/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A (new)
Recital A (new)
A. whereas, under the Charter of the United Nations, every member state has the responsibility to promote universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and freedoms,
Amendment 12 #
2009/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. Whereas the European Parliament plays an important role as regards the promotion andof human rights and democracy, including protection of human rightstheir defenders, through delegations to third countries, hearings, resolutions, letters and not the least the Sakharov Prize,;
Amendment 23 #
2009/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Ha (new)
Recital Ha (new)
Ha. Whereas these actions constitute a clear violation of the international human rights law and a series of universally recognised fundamental freedoms;
Amendment 45 #
2009/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reminds that implementation by the EU missions of the guidelines on human rights defenders has so far been unsatisfactory, but through and calls on the Commission to undertake an in-depth analysis to ensure that this issue will be addressed; notes, in this regard, that as a consequence of the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty, Commission delegations in third countries will now have a rare opportunity to address this issue as they become Union delegations, with an increasingly important role in terms of representation of the EU and the implementation of the human rights policy; reiterates therefore its call to systematically appoint to each country a highly qualified political official with a specific responsibility on human rights and democracy, and to integrate guidelines on human rights and their implementation in EU mission staff training programmes, job descriptions and appraisal processes;
Amendment 75 #
2009/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14a (new)
Paragraph 14a (new)
14a. Reminds that the European Parliament’s delegations, as responsible bodies of the EP relations with third countries, could play an even more substantial role in the effort to help human right defenders, pursuant to the specific guidelines for human rights and democracy actions of MEPs in their visits to third countries,
Amendment 83 #
2009/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15a (new)
Paragraph 15a (new)
15a. Stresses the need to ensure that the invocation of national and public security, including counter-terrorism, is not used arbitrarily against human rights defenders,
Amendment 3 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 26 November 2009 on a political solution to the problem of piracy off the Somali coast; note: P7_TA(2009)0099
Amendment 4 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 b (new)
Citation 7 b (new)
– having regard to the exchange of letters among the European Union and the Governments of Kenya and the Republic of the Seychelles, concerning the transfer to these countries of suspected pirates and armed robbers apprehended by EUNAVFOR in the operation area,
Amendment 6 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the European Security Strategy (ESS) and the report on its implementation highlight the key threats and challenges facing the European Union: • proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, • terrorism and organised crime, • cyber-security, • energy security, • impact of climate change, • regional conflicts, • failed states; and natural disasters, • regional conflicts, • state failure • maritime piracy;
Amendment 10 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that, through common policies and actions decided in the framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), the Union is taking steps to address the challenges and threats identified in the ESS, thereby helping to improve the security of European citizenwith the aim of guaranteeing the security of European citizens and contributing to the preservation of peace in the world, in accordance with the purposes and principles of the United Nations Charter, with the principles of the Helsinki Final Act and with the aims of the Charter of Paris, including those relating to external borders;
Amendment 13 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reiterates its recommendation for a regular review of the ESS, every five years, coinciding with the beginning of a new parliamentary term and after due consultation with the European Parliament;
Amendment 14 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Stresses that primary responsibility for maintaining peace and security in the world lies with the UN Security Council and reiterates the need for a reform of the United Nations Organisation in order to make it more capable of exercising its functions and providing effective solutions to global challenges and threats;
Amendment 15 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges the need for the Union to pursue these objectives by enhancing its own institutional capacity to respond to these challenges and by means of multilateral cooperation with and within international organisations – in particular the United Nations – and regional organisations in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations;
Amendment 21 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates its support for the Union’s efforts to address these threats by developing a holisticcomprehensive approach synergising the various means of action – both civil and militaryincluding conflict prevention and crisis management, financial assistance and development cooperation, social and environmental policies, diplomatic and trade policy instruments and enlargement – available to the Union and its Member States; emphasises that such coordination of civil and military means gives genuine added-value to the Union’s crisis management work;
Amendment 36 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises that, in the longer term, a measure along the lines of a White Paper – providing scope for a wide-ranging public debate – would raise the profile of the CSDP and step up security and defence cooperation by defining the Union’s security and defence interests more clearly, thereby making the implementation of the ESS and the planning and conduct of EU crisis management operations more effective and better defined;
Amendment 41 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 – introductory sentence and point a
Paragraph 8 – introductory sentence and point a
8. Calls on the Council to enter into a substantial debate with the European Parliament and the national parliaments in 2010 on the implementation of the new provisions in the Lisbon Treaty concerning the CSDP, including: a. the creation of the post ofrole of the Vice- President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, coupled with the establishment of a European external action service (EEAS) incorporating the crisis management units,
Amendment 47 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls, after the introduction of a clause on mutual assistance, as formulated in Article 42 of the Lisbon Treaty, on those European Union Member States belonging to the Western European Union (WEU) to terminate the Modified Brussels Treaty of 1954;
Amendment 59 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Takes the view that the Vice- President/High Representative should act very rapidly to make the Union’s various external policies more coherent, and that this coherence should be reflected on the ground by special representatives/heads of delegation vested with a certainthe necessary authority vis-à-vis the different European playersparties concerned and the international community;
Amendment 63 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Supports the establishment of a civil- military Crisis Management and Planning Directorate (CMPD) to take responsibility for crisis management and strategic planning of the Union’s civil and military operations and help develop the CSDP, particularly in terms of civil and military capabilities; deprecates, however, the extremely lengthy delay in setting up this new structure; hopes that the instruments available to the Commission will also be used as part of this single strategic planning capacity in order to develop a holistic European approach; takes the view that the establishment of the EEAS, into which the CMPD will be incorporated as part of a coherent grouping that will also include the EU Military Staff, Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability (CPCC) and the Joint Situation Centre (SitCen), should make it possible to meet these requirements; calls for an appropriate proportion of civilian experts at the leadership level of the CMPD and a serious commitment to address gender disparities at all levels;
Amendment 69 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Recalls that the EEAS must fully comply with the Charter of Fundamental Rights in all aspects of the Union's external action in accordance with the spirit and purpose of the Lisbon Treaty;
Amendment 72 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls once again for the establishment of a permanent EU operations centre overseen by the Vice-President/High Representative, which would be responsible for operational planning and the conduct of military operations; calls for this operations centre to be attached to the EEAS; stresses that the division of the existing system into seven headquarters makesexisting divided system its less effective and responsive and generates huge costs, and that a permanent interlocutor in the military sphere is essential for civil and military coordination on the ground; takes the view that the permanent operations centre could therefore be classed as a form of military planning and operational capacity, and located in the same place as the CPCC in order to allow the necessary synergies for effective civilian and military coordination; reiterates that the EU operations centre would complement existing NATO command structures, without compromising the decisional autonomy of both organisations;
Amendment 89 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the successful contribution made by the European Union’s naval operation in Somalia (EU NAVFOR Somalia – Operation Atalanta) in combating piracy in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia; praises, at the same time, its contribution to the reinforcement of naval cooperation in Europe and the further development of the maritime dimension of the CSDP; emphasises that Operation Atalanta has established itself as a key player in the fight against piracy, inter alia through the Maritime Security Centre (Horn of Africa), and is in favour of extending and broadening the mandate for this operation designed to address a security issue directly affecting the EU (security of citizens and supplies) and respond to a humanitarian and operational emergency (by escorting ships chartered by the World Food Programme to deliver food to the Somali population and ships delivering logistical support to the African Union’s military observation mission in Somalia (AMISOM)); also welcomes the involvement of non-EU countries (Norway and Croatia) and the operation’s constructive cooperation with the other naval forces present in the region, particularly in the context of the SHADE (Shared Awareness and Deconfliction) processes;
Amendment 95 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Welcomes the Council decision to extend the operation for another year until December 2010; regrets, however, the continuing problems with the prosecution of suspected pirates and armed robbers apprehended in the operation area, which undermine the credibility of the international anti-piracy efforts;
Amendment 105 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Recalls the need to stabilise the security and political situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan in order to contain the global threats directly affecting Europeans’ security (terrorism, drug trafficking and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction) and, accordingly, welcomes the EU Action Plan for Afghanistan and Pakistan adopted by the Council on 27 October 2009; calls, howeverreiterates the need for a comprehensive approach in dealing with these issues, linking security more closely with development, the rule of law and respect for human rights, as well as gender-related aspects; calls, therefore, on the Council and the Commission to take more tangible steps toin this direction, also by increaseing the EU’s contribution and ensureing that its activities are better integrated with those of the Member States and of the international community;
Amendment 116 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Commends the successful deployment of the EULEX Kosovo mission throughout Kosovo, and emphasises the need for all its components (police, justice and customs) to be able to continue to operate unhindered throughout the territory, including in the north, within the general framework of UN Security Resolution 1244;
Amendment 117 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. In this connection, welcomes the signing of the police cooperation agreement between EULEX Kosovo and Serbia, and notes the purely technical nature of this agreement designed to facilitate the fight agaiimed at combating corruption and organised crime without prejudice to the differing positionst organised crimen the status of Kosovo;
Amendment 144 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
Paragraph 38
38. Reiterates, with a view to the revision of the treaty on nWelcomes UNSC Resolution 1887 of 24 September 2009 and fully supports its calls for a halt to the spread of nuclear weapons and intensified efforts to achieve disarmament under strict and effective international control; calls on the Member States to formulate a strong common position for the 2010 Nuclear Non-pProliferation in May 2010,Treaty (NPT) Review Conference and reiterates its recommendation to the Council of 24 April 2009 on non-proliferation and the future of the Treaty on the Non- Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)*1, stressing the need further to reinforce all three pillars of the NPT, namely non- proliferation, disarmament and cooperation on the civilian use of nuclear energy; 1 Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2009)0333. urges, furthermore, for the ratification and entrance into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test -Ban Treaty (CTBT);
Amendment 148 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Welcomes the declarations and stated objectives of the new American administration and its commitment to take nuclear disarmament forward; welcomes, at the same time, the commitment of the Russian Federation and the United States of America to continue negotiations to conclude a new comprehensive legally binding agreement to replace the Treaty on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (START I), which expired in December 2009; looks forward to tangible results in this regard, at the earliest possible date;
Amendment 155 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
Paragraph 40 a (new)
40a. Reiterates its full support for wider disarmament and a total ban on weapons, such as chemical and biological weapons, antipersonnel mines, cluster and depleted uranium munitions, that cause great suffering to civilians; urges, therefore, enhanced multilateral efforts to secure full implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), the Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM), the Anti- Personnel Mines Convention (APMC) and the further development of the international regime against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction; welcomes, in this regard, the commitments undertaken by all EU Member States with the adoption of the EU Common Position on Arms Exports, as well as the provision of Article 28B(1) of the Lisbon Treaty, which entrusts joint disarmament operations to the EU;
Amendment 156 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 b (new)
Paragraph 40 b (new)
40b. Welcomes the German coalition agreement of 24 October 2009 on the withdrawal of US nuclear weapons from Germany in the context of its support for President Obama's policy for a world free of nuclear weapons, the desirability of intermediate steps in reaching this goal and the necessity of introducing new dynamics in arms control and disarmament at the 2010 NPT Review Conference; encourages other Member States with US nuclear weapons on their soil to make a similar clear commitment;
Amendment 172 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47 a (new)
Paragraph 47 a (new)
47a. Regards it as important to strengthen the civil capacity for conflict resolution; therefore calls on the Council and the Commission to establish an EU Civil Peace Corps with civil protection and humanitarian relief capabilities for crisis management and conflict prevention as requested by the European Parliament since 2000;
Amendment 193 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 62
Paragraph 62
Amendment 195 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 63
Paragraph 63
63. Recalls the need for constructive cooperation between the EU and NATO, particularly where the two organisations are active in the same theatres of operation; 1 Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2009)0076. , with due regard for the different nature of the two organisations, their equality and the autonomy of each party in decision- making;
Amendment 200 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 64
Paragraph 64
64. Views it as regrettable that the technical agreements between the NATO and EU operations in Afghanistan and Kosovo have still not been signed; recommends avoiding unconstructive blockages and calls for the development of a new institutional framework for EU- NATO relations that facilitates broader cooperation when the two organisations operate in the same theatre of operations.
Amendment 215 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 70 a (new)
Paragraph 70 a (new)
70a. Stresses that the further development of the EU's strategic partnership with Russia needs to include meaningful dialogue on security, crisis management and conflict resolution; underlines that this should be based on the stated commitment of both parties to their shared values, respect for international law and territorial integrity;
Amendment 219 #
2009/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 71
Paragraph 71
71. Takes the view that the new version of the anti-missile shield envisaged by the American administration should be based ondiscussed in the context of a common European approach to the matter, in coordination with Russia, and with efforts being madeand, if such a system is to be developed, invite Russia to cooperate on the matter, and make the necessary efforts to involve the European defence industry in its development;
Amendment 27 #
2009/2133(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – point d
Paragraph 5 – point d
(d) the High Representative should pay particular attention to recruitment and staff issues, as the EEAS will encompass staff from the Commission, from the Council and from the Member States; for the EEAS to become a professional diplomatic service it will need to be adequately resourced and staffed on the basis of merit and with respect for the appropriata transparent and objective selection procedures and an adequ proportionate geographical balancerepresentation;
Amendment 37 #
2009/2133(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that, while the EU delegations in third countries will complement existing diplomatic representations of the Member States, there will be possibilities for long- term gains in efficiency, as the future EU delegation could in many cases, and especially in the absence of national representations, take over consular services and deal with Schengen visa issues;
Amendment 1 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 22 October 2009 on the institutional aspects of setting up the European External Action Service (EEAS)1,
Amendment 6 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, in its relations with the wider world, the EU should uphold and promote its values and interests and contribute to the protection of its citizens; whereas it seeks to advance these values worldwide with the aim of contributing to peace, security, the sustainable development of the Earth, solidarity and mutual respect among peoples, free and fair trade, eradication of poverty and the protection of human rights, in particular the rights of the child, as well as the strict observance and development of international law, including respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter,
Amendment 26 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates that, in order to allow the EU to play an active role in the world, sufficient funds need to be allocated in the EU budget; regrets that the relevant budget continues to be underfunded and expresses its serious concern over the consequences of under-financing for the Union’s ability to conduct a credible and proactive foreign policy; also underlines the need to equip the Union with the necessary financial means for a consistent and adequate response to unforeseen global challenges and, in this regard, calls on the High Representative and on the Commission to bring forward adequate proposals, developing at the same time an effective communication strategy to better inform European citizens of the purposes and the merits of the CFSP; strongly reiterates the importance of democratic legitimacy and scrutiny of the European Union’s foreign and security policy and looks forward to being consulted on the procedures for granting rapid access to appropriations in the Union budget for urgent financing of CFSP initiatives;
Amendment 42 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the ratification and the coming into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, which provides the EU with tools for the further enhancement of its role and visibility on the international scene; stresses, in this respect, the major responsibility of each Member State, the Council and the new Vice-President/High Representative to translate the written provisions of the Treaty into actual facts and substantial action;
Amendment 43 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Underlines the importance of the Treaty provision according to which the competence of the Union in matters of the CFSP will now cover all areas of foreign policy and all questions relating to the Union's security, including the progressive framing of a common defence policy that might lead to a common defence;
Amendment 44 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Stresses that Member States should work in a spirit of mutual political solidarity for the achievement of an ever- increasing degree of convergence of actions in the field of the CFSP;
Amendment 60 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Recalls that the EEAS must guarantee full application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in all aspects of the Union's external action in accordance with the spirit and purpose of the Treaty of Lisbon;
Amendment 63 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Continues to be concerned about the repeated gas crises such as the Russian- Ukrainian crisis of January 2009, which highlighted the EU’s increasing energy dependency on sources of supply and transit channels which face threats to their stability;security of energy supply and recalls the urgent need to address energy challenges by implementing a common European external energy policy; calls in this regard on the Vice-President/High Representative to pursue with determination Parliament's recommendations for the development of such aa coherent and coordinated policy, in particular by promoting EU cohesion in negotiations with energy suppliers and transit countries and defending the common interests of the Member States, by developing effective energy diplomacy and more efficient mechanisms for responding to crisis situations and, finally, by promoting the diversification of energy supplies, sustainable energy use and the development of renewable energy sources;
Amendment 70 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that significant potential threats and conflicts arise from intensified competition over access to, and control of, natural and energy resources, and consequently that the EU should further develop mitigation and adaptation policies with a view to addressing the security risks posed by environmental degradation and climate change; considers in this regard that the EU needs to continue to strengthen its leadership in global climate governance, given that climate change has become a key element of international relations;
Amendment 76 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Comments on the importance of conflict prevention and management, including post-crisis rehabilitation and reconstruction; underlines the need for the EU to further develop preventive strategies, to improve early warning and to enhance cooperation with regional organisations in accordance with the UN Charter;
Amendment 91 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Reiterates the need for disarmament and strengthened international guarantees of non-proliferation; welcomes, in this regard, the Joint Statement of 4 December 2009 by which the President of the United States of America and the President of the Russian Federation committed themselves to continue to work together after the expiry of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) and looks forward to a new pact on strategic arms to be signed and enter into force as soon as possible; calls, at the same time, on the EU and its Member States to enhance their diplomatic efforts in order to achieve a successful revision of the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons in May 2010;
Amendment 98 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. THighlights the centrality of the United Nations in the international system, as the guarantor of international peace and security and the most comprehensive framework for multilateral cooperation; takes the view that strengthening global governance is of paramount importance for effective multilateralism, and that it must therefore be an overriding strategic priority for the Union; considers that the EU institutions and the Member States should continue their efforts in deepening cooperation with strategic partners exerting global influence, in particular within the United Nations; considers it essential that the relevant EU delegations at the UN's headquarters in New York and Geneva be adequately equipped with means and staff in order to be able credibly and effectively to deliver in practice the new institutional arrangements under the Treaty of Lisbon; notes with concern, therefore, that an approach of budget neutrality runs counter to this urgent need quickly and efficiently to establish the EU's presence at the UN during the initial phase of implementation of the Treaty of Lisbon;
Amendment 101 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Believes that the OSCE provides an important framework for restoring trust and enhancing cooperation between the countries of Europe, Central Asia and North America on a number of issues, including non-proliferation, disarmament, economic cooperation and protection and promotion of human rights and the rule of law; supports, therefore, the strengthening of the OSCE also in terms of granting it a legal personality;
Amendment 102 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. BelievesTakes the view that both the EU and NATO shwould develop a more intensbenefit by a more effective partnership, taking into account the progressivefurther development of the EU's foreign, security and defence policies; to that end, recommends a review of the so-called Berlin-Plus arrangements and the development of a more strategic dialogue on shared strategic interests and contingency planning, recognising the different nature of the two organisations and fully respecting the decision-making autonomy of each party; to that end, and being fully aware of the current problematic situation, recommends a review of the so-called Berlin-Plus arrangements and the development of a new institutional framework of EU-NATO relations that facilitates broader cooperation at military or civilian level when the two organisations operate in the same theatre of operations; encourages the Member States and the allies to develop an organisation-to-organisation rather than a member-to-organisation approach in order to secure practical cooperation in the field;
Amendment 128 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Notes with satisfaction the generally peaceful and stable situation in Kosovo and the efforts to build a multi-ethnic society, as demonstrated by the successful local elections held on 15 November 2009; welcomes the fact that the EULEX rule of law mission in Kosovo, which is the largest civilian CSDP mission launched so far by the EU, is working at full operational capacity under the general framework of UN Security Council Resolution 1244; underlines the mission’s importance in promoting inter-ethnic reconciliation, the rule of law, public order and security throughout the whole of Kosovo, by assisting the Kosovo institutions, judicial authorities and law enforcement agencies in their progress towards sustainability and accountability; in this respect, welcomes the decision to open a new EULEX office in the north; however, notes the need to increase the number of prosecutors working in EULEX, and calls on the Member States to provide additional personnel;
Amendment 140 #
2009/2057(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. CStresses the need for a reinvigorated partnership with Russia and looks forward to speedy progress in the current negotiations on a new comprehensive agreement that should provide the legal basis for substantial enhancement of EU- Russia relations; calls on the Vice- President/High Representative to ensure that the EU's approach towards Russia is coherent and driven by a commitment to the values of democracy, respect for human rights and the rule of law, including international law; underlines at the same time the need to enhance cooperation with Russia with regard to Iran, Afghanistan and the Middle East, pursuing the goal of strengthening global security and stability;
Amendment 11 #
2009/0104(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) With the aim of furthering the implementation of the Thessaloniki agenda, the Commission should start a visa liberalisation dialogue with Kosovo and establish a roadmap for visa liberalisation similar to those established with other Western Balkan countries. This should be without prejudice to the status of Kosovo and with due respect for UNSC resolution 1244/99.
Amendment 85 #
2008/2336(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 78 a (new)
Paragraph 78 a (new)
78a. Strongly deplores the recent military escalation in Gaza and, in particular, the heavy bombardment of that densely populated land and the fact that civilian and UN targets have been hit during the attacks; regrets the further deterioration of the humanitarian situation in Gaza, expressing at the same time its unconditional sympathy for the civilian population in southern Israel; urges all parties to fully implement the UN Security Council resolution 1860 with a view to securing a permanent ceasefire; takes note of the statement made by UNSG Ban Ki-moon to the Security Council on 21 January 2009, underlining the urgent need for international humanitarian law to be fully respected and for civilians to be protected, making it clear at the same time that "there should be thorough investigations, full explanations, and, where it is required, accountability"; welcomes in this regard the commitment of the External Relations Council of 27 January 2009 to follow those investigations closely;
Amendment 88 #
2008/2336(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 79
Paragraph 79
79. Urges the Council and the Commission to set up human rights subcommittees with all neighbourhood countries, and in particular with Israel, as part of the negotiations on an upgrading of the bilateral relations, and as expressed by both parties as a result of the Association Council on 16 June 2008; welcomes the first meeting of the subcommittee with the Palestinian Authority on 2 December 2008; reiterates its call for parliamentarians to be associated with the preparations for meetings of such subcommittees and to be informed of their outcome; points out once again that, as in the case of Tunisia, the subcommittees' sessions might focus on establishing the durability of the subcommittee concerned and fostering trust and confidence amongst the partners; points out that the subcommittee dealing with Morocco should eventually move towards a results-oriented phase, with the establishment of concrete benchmarks and indicators of progress, as well as the possibility of raising individual cases; stresses that discussions on human rights should certainly not be confined to these subcommittees, and emphasises the importance of coordination with other subcommittees dealing with human rights- related issues, such as migration; highlights the need to include these issues in the political dialogue up to the highest level so as to increase the coherence of the EU's policy in this field and reduce discrepancies in statements on the human rights situation given by both sides to the press; in the context of concluding a framework agreement with Libya, welcomes the opening of the negotiations and calls on the Council and the Commission to give due attention to dialogue and cooperation on human rights;
Amendment 92 #
2008/2336(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83
Paragraph 83
83. Notes the importance of both Turkey's and the EU's commitment to Turkey's accession process for the ongoing human rights reforms in Turkey; considers as a positive step towards freedom of speech in Turkey the decision of the government to permit the broadcasting of Kurdish television; regrets, however, the fact that the use of the Kurdish language is still banned in parliament and in political campaigning; reiterates that further legislative reforms are needed in order to ensure respect for and protection of minorities and full freedom of expression, in law and in practice, in line with the European Convention on Human Rights and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights; notes with concern that no progress has been made as regards ratification of human rights instruments, in particular the OPCAT, the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Additional Protocol Nos 4, 7 and 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights;
Amendment 94 #
2008/2336(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 86
Paragraph 86
86. Calls on Russia as an occupying power in GeorgNotes with concern that residents of Abkhazia and South Ossetia remain uncovered by the human rights protection mechanisms provided for by the Council of Europe; calls on Russia to uphold human rights in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, including the right of citizenrefugees to return to their homes; calls on all partiesthe Russian government and the Georgian government to continue to implement their commitments pursuant to the agreements of 12 August and 8 September 2008; askurges all governmentparties concerned to continue to provide detailed maps and information concerning all areas affected by the conflict onto which cluster bombs were fired, so as to facilitate the clearance of cluster weapon munitions and make those areas safe for civilians; considers that both governments should also ensure that the public is made aware of the dangers of unexploded materiel through public information campaigns; calls on the responsible administrations to agree to the deployment of international human rights monitors to South Ossetia and Abkhazia; expresses its concern that the recently adopted constitutional amendments and the law on occupied territories of Georgia may be at odds with principles of international human rights law, and calls on the government in Tbilisi to collaborate with the Venice Commission and to implement promptly any recommendations made by it;
Amendment 109 #
2008/2336(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 15 January 2009 on the situation in the Gaza Strip1 and the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council of 27 January 2009 on the Middle East Peace Process,
Amendment 1 #
2008/2288(INI)
Citation 8
– having regard to the Joint DeclarationStatement of the I EU-Brazil Summit, Lisbon, 4 July 2007,
Amendment 2 #
2008/2288(INI)
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the Joint Statement of the II EU-Brazil Summit, Rio de Janeiro, 22 December 2008,
Amendment 5 #
2008/2288(INI)
Recital B
B. whereas the I EU-Brazil Summit launched the EU-Brazil Strategic Partnership, on the basis of their close historic, cultural and economic links, and the II EU-Brazil Summit adopted a Joint Action Plan to be a framework for action in their Strategic Partnership over a three-year period,
Amendment 9 #
2008/2288(INI)
Paragraph 1 – point l
l) The Partners must work jointly to tackle the most pressing global challenges in the area of peace and security, inter alia, disarmament, non-proliferation and arms control of nuclear weapons, especially nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and their means of delivery, corruption, transnational organised crime and, more specifically, drug trafficking, money laundering, trafficking in small arms, light weapons and ammunition, trafficking in human beings and terrorism; they should demonstrate total commitment to the EU- LAC Mechanism on Drugs;
Amendment 11 #
2008/2288(INI)
Paragraph 1 – point s
s) The Partners should develop low carbon energy technologies and ensure the sustainable production and use of renewable energies, including sustainable biofuels which do not affect the production of food crops and biodiversity. They should increase the percentage of renewable energies in their global energy mix and, promote energy efficiency and access to energy, and achieve greater energy security;
Amendment 13 #
2008/2288(INI)
Paragraph 1 – point v
v) The Strategic Partnership should provide for a regularthe establishment of a regular structured dialogue between the Members of the Brazilian National Congress and of the European Parliament;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
– having regard to the Council joint action on a European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast, dated 10 November 2008,
Amendment 39 #
2008/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Recalls that the consolidation of the post-status Kosovo iStresses the importance of the EU presence in Kosovo and regards the European perspective of all the countries of the region as essential for the achievement of stability in the Western Balkans; calls welcomes, therefore, the rapid andconsensus achieved in the UN Security Council on 26 November 2008 for the full deployment of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX) throughout that country, and urges the Council to maintain a continuous dialogue with the United Nations Mission in Kosovo so as to ensure a clear and swift handover between the two missionson the basis of the status-neutral approach of the United Nations, and urges all parties to cooperate closely with the European mission in order to ensure the rule of law for all the inhabitants of Kosovo; expresses its support for the work of the European Union Special Representative in Kosovo and encourages him to continue to implement his mandate, with due consideration for the positions of all Member States as expressed in the related decisions of the Council, including that of 18 February 2008;
Amendment 60 #
2008/2241(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. BWelcomes the decision of the EU- Russia summit, held in Nice on 14 November 2008, to continue the negotiations for a strategic partnership; believes that the EU’s partnership with Russia must be based on a coherent strategy and a clear commitment by both sides to acting in full respect for international law; in line with the European Council Presidency conclusions of 1 September and 15-16 October 2008, underlines that Russia must comply with the commitments it entered into under the agreements of 12 August and 8 September 2008; is convinced, therefore, that there can be no normalisation of relations until Russia allowsnotes with satisfaction that Russia has fulfilled a large part of its commitments under the six-point ceasefire agreement, and expresses the hope that it will continue to cooperate with the international community, affording international observers the possibility to monitor the situation in South Ossetia and Abkhazia and fully complies with the terms of the 6-point planproviding for the return of the refugees;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
Citation 4
– having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Russian Federation, of the other part, which entered into force on 1 December 1997 and expired in 2007, and to the resumption of the negotiations on a renewed Partnership and Cooperation Agreement in December 2008,
Amendment 2 #
2008/2236(INI)
Amendment 9 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas the ENP remains one of the principal priorities of the European Union's foreign policy and the ENP offers all the States concerned the possibility of closer integration with the EU,
Amendment 12 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that, overall, the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1638/2006 are adequate and valid for the purposes of cooperation with neighbouring countries and other multilateral organisations; underlines, however, the need to clearly specify objectives in all areas as these are a precondition for assessing effectiveness;
Amendment 14 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 17 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Takes the view that the visibility of the Community assistance should be increased through targeted communication with stakeholders and the general public and recommends that contacts be developed to this end with civil society and local authorities, as they are closer to the citizens and therefore represent a competent and effective level at which to act;
Amendment 20 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the annual action programmes in the fields of democracy, the rule of law and human rights to be pursued more ambitiously, in order to avoid a significant allocations gap between the Eastern and the Mediterranean partners; believes that more should be done to persuade the partner governments to commit themselves to action in those fields;
Amendment 23 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Finds that, despite the increased flexibility and simplicity of the Community assistance instruments, as evidenced in particular by the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, the procedures and timeframes under the ENPI remain burdensome for civil society organisations and local authorities; calls on the Commission to conduct a comparative analysis of the procedures applied by other major donors and to present the results thereof to Parliament;
Amendment 25 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that sectoral and general budget support under the ENPI should be made available only to countries which are able to implement it in a transparent, effective and accountable manner and where it constitutes a real incentive; calls on the Commission to review the appropriateness of budget support in countries which have problems with budgetary management and control procedures and high levels of corruption;
Amendment 30 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the importance of enhancclarifying the coordination and complementarity of therelationship between the ENP as a framework policy and the regional ENP initiatives, such as the Black Sea Synergy, the UfM and the future Eastern Partnership, and of enhancing the coordination and complementarity of these initiatives and of the different Community assistance instruments; calls for improved synchronisation between ENPI programmes and the financial cooperation provided by the Member States;
Amendment 35 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. stresses the need for payments under the ENP to be transparent as regards country, region and priority field;
Amendment 41 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines the need to increase the ENPI financial envelope in order to enable the ENP to attain its increasingly ambitious objectives and to support its new regional initiatives; asks that, when this occurs, the geographical distribution of EU financial aid between the Mediterranean countries and the countries of Eastern Europe be maintained, as provided for in the 2007- 2013 financial perspective;
Amendment 48 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Takes the view that the recent geopolitical developments in the EU's Eastern neighbourhood underscore the importance of developing the ENP further by adapting it better to the needs of the partners, including an enhanced EU involvement in the Black Sea region and an ambitious Eastern Partnership, this partnership being one that should aim to achieve concrete results in certain top priority fields such as energy, transport, immigration and combating organised crime; stresses the need to speed up, in relation to Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova in particular, the establishment of a free trade zone as soon as partner countries are ready and the need to finalise as soon as possible steps towards visa freedom with the EU;
Amendment 64 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses that the financial envelope for Belarus needs to be increased and cooperation broadened to cover areas beyond energy, the environment and migration, with a view to pursuing the policy of re-engagement initiated by the Council in September 2008; underlines the need for effective political conditionality and for guarantees that the assistance will have an immediatestresses that the EU should give civil society and poslitive impact on citizens and will not be misused by the authorities against their political opponentscal parties defending democracy more effective support;
Amendment 67 #
2008/2236(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19, indent 2
Paragraph 19, indent 2
– guarantees that any financial assistance granted to the Russian authorities takes into considerationcontributes to the strengthening of democratic standards in the Russian Federation;
Amendment 12 #
2008/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes the declaration of the heads of State and Government that the BP:UfM demonstrates a determination to favour the development of human resources and employment in line with the Millennium Development Goals, including by alleviating poverty, and looks forward to new initiatives, programmes and financial provisions to that end;
Amendment 33 #
2008/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Regards the EMPA as the most appropriate forum for transparent dialogue on human rights, democracy and cultural issues; considers that there needs to be a periodic evaluation of the progress achieved, and therefore welcomes the fact that the European Parliament presidency has made it a priority to have discussions in the plenary of the EMPA and for an annual report to be drafted on the human rights situation in the Euro-Med area; supports the dialogue between civilisations and encourages the upgrading of links between EMPA and the Anna Lindh Foundation, including the organisation of meetings between leading networks of the Anna Lindh foundation and the EMPA Culture Committee;
Amendment 49 #
2008/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Strongly supports the environmental dimension of the BP:UfM and the related initiatives and projects, such as the new Euro-Mediterranean initiative for the de- pollution of the Mediterranean and the Mediterranean Project for Solar Energy;
Amendment 73 #
2008/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the EU is and should continue to be committed to the fulfilment of the UN Millennium Development Goals,
Amendment 74 #
2008/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas participation in the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean does not constitute an alternative to enlargement of the EU and does not affect the accession prospects of any current or future candidate state,
Amendment 91 #
2008/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the Heads of State and of Government recognised in the Declaration of the Paris Summit for the Mediterranean that the EMPA will be the legitimate parliamentary expression of the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean, declaring at the same time their strong support for the strengthening of the role of the EMPA in its relations with Mediterranean partners,
Amendment 99 #
2008/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
Citation 12 a (new)
– having regard to the priorities for the European Parliament Presidency of the EMPA (March 2008 - March 2009),
Amendment 4 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the European Union needs a strong and effective foreign, security and defence policy in order to promote peace and international security, to defend its interests in the world, to protect the security of its own citizens and to defendadvance the respect of human rights worldwide;
Amendment 9 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recognises the need for the EU to pursue these objectives through multilateral cooperation in international organisations, first of all the United Nations, and through partnership with other key actors in accordance with the United Nations Charter, the principles of the Helsinki Final Act and the objectives of the Paris Charter;
Amendment 10 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Reiterates the need for a reform of the United Nations Organisation in order to make it capable to fulfil fully its responsibilities and to act effectively in providing solutions to global challenges and responding to key threats;
Amendment 25 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Reiterates the importance of the transatlantic relationship and recognises the need of coordination of actions between ESDP and NATO, but at the same time urges for a more balanced partnership, without competition and with respect of each others autonomy and mutual understanding in case of diverging strategic consideration;
Amendment 38 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that until now, Member States have defined their security interests on a purely national basis while the notion of "European security interest", by contrast, is still politically taboo; considers this approach no longer acceptablecounterproductive and urges Member States to think widely in order to make of the EU a more important actor on the international scene, providing for more effective European security arrangements;
Amendment 51 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that the European Union has to define more clearly its ambitions concerning its role in the world; is of the opinion that the European Union should not try to become a superpower like the United States, but that it should instead guarantee its security and secur, work for the stability in its neighbourhood and contribute to a multilateral global system of security in the framework of the United Nations, providing for the respect of International Law and effective crisis and conflict prevention, as well as post-conflict management and resolution;
Amendment 65 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Is of the opinion that, although many elements of the strategy are still valid, others should be adapted; states this is the case in particular for the relationship between the European Union and Russia, EU engagement in Africa, but also its energy supply, maritime security, climate change and cyber warfare;
Amendment 81 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Regrets that Russia’s disproportionate response to the outbreak of violence in the Caucasus and the recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent states have plunged the West’s relationship with Russia into a crisise outbreak of violence in the Caucasus due to the initiative of Georgia, the Russian disproportionate response, as well as the declaration of independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia; notes with concern that thisese violations of international law has severely damagedand their collateral consequences for the Euro-Atlantic partnership with Russia;
Amendment 91 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Amendment 98 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes the concerns expressed by the Baltic states and requests that NATO draw up specific plans for their defenceiterates the European solidarity clause, as provided in the Treaties of the European Union;
Amendment 196 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation - 1 a (new)
Citation - 1 a (new)
- having regard to the Treaty on European Union, Title V,
Amendment 200 #
2008/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 d (new)
Citation 7 d (new)
- having regard to the Council Joint Action 2008/851/CFSP on a European Union Military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast, adopted on 10 November 2008;
Amendment 3 #
2008/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the United Nations and the UNHRC potentially constitute one of the organisations best ablemost appropriate institutions to deal comprehensively with the human rights issues and challenges facing mankind todayhumanitarian challenges,
Amendment 41 #
2008/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Denounces the use of political alliances to shield certainsome States from scrutiny rather than to critically assess human rights conditions and protections, which seriously undermines the very purpose of the UPR; notes that this practice reached a dangerous leexpresses concern that EU Member States did not engage constructively in the review of Tunisia, which appeared to be an orchestrated exercise in filibustering; notes, however, that that particular review did not seem to reflect a trend;
Amendment 47 #
2008/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls on all States to carry out an extensive national consultation following the review, on the basis of its recommendations; calls on the EU to investigate further how those recommendations can be used in the development of technical assistance programmes;
Amendment 64 #
2008/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Welcomes the increasing trend wherebyfor EU Member States to intervene in the debates in addition to the EU Presidency; calls for this to be further developed, and calls on EU Member States to reinforce the EU’s message by putting acrossarticulating "one message, but with many voices"; stresses that coordination with regard to speaking in the UNHRC should encourage EU Member States to further develop the Presidency statement with additional information, perspectives and ideas;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to the EU-Western Balkans Declaration, which was unanimously approved by the Foreign Ministers of all the EU Member States and by the Foreign Ministers of the Western Balkan States in Salzburg on 11 March 2006,
Amendment 2 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
Citation 4
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Councils of 14 December 2007 and 19-20 June 2008, and 14 December 2007s well as the Declaration on the Western Balkans annexed thereto, and the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Councils of 10 December 2007, 18 February 2008, and 8-9 December 2008,
Amendment 3 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
– having regard to the Brdo Statement: New focus on the Western Balkans, made by the EU Presidency on 29 March 2008, underlining the need to give a fresh impetus to the Thessaloniki agenda and the Salzburg Declaration,
Amendment 5 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
Amendment 13 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas a number of regional partners of the EU continue to have unresolved issues with their neighbours; whereas the EU and the Western Balkan countries are agreed that good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation remain key factors in advancing towards EU membership,
Amendment 14 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas the European future of the Western Balkans depends to a large extent also on the countries in the region themselves and on their commitment to the implementation of reforms in order to meet the Copenhagen political and economic criteria, as well as the requirements of the Stabilisation and Association process; whereas the progress of each country in fulfilling those requirements is regularly monitored by the EU and the performance of every candidate is measured on the basis of individual merits and success; whereas this differentiation among the countries should not generate a climate of negative competition on the road to accession, as it remains clear that the final objective is the accession of all the Balkan countries to the EU,
Amendment 19 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Reaffirms its full support for the European perspective of all the Western Balkan countries as set out in the Thessaloniki Agenda and the Salzburg Declaration; remains convinced that this continues to be an essential factor for the stability, reconciliation and peaceful future of the region and in the best interests of Europe as a whole;
Amendment 26 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the accession process must be based on a fair and rigorous application of the principle of conditionality whereby each country will be judged solely in the light of its capacity to meet the Copenhagen criteria, the conditions of the Stabilisation and Association process and all the benchmarks laid down in relation to a specific stage of the negotiations, and, consequently, that the accession process must not be slowed down or blocked for countries that have satisfied the benchmarkrequirements previously set;
Amendment 38 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that all parties concerned must make serious efforts to find mutually acceptable solutions to outstanding bilateral disputes between EU Member States and countries of the Western Balkans; believes that the opening of accession negotiations and the opening and closing of negotiation chapters should be based exclusively on an objective evaluation by the Commission, and that EU Member States must not obstruct or block the accession process over questions relating to strictly bilateral disputes;
Amendment 41 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines the importance of good neighbourly relations and the need to preserve peace and enhance stability and security in the Western Balkans;
Amendment 49 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Fully supports the efforts aimed at establishing by 2010 a comprehensive Western Balkans Investment Framework for the coordination of grants and loans offered by the Commission, by international financial institutions and by individual country donors; welcomes the Infrastructure Project Facility (IPF) and points out that IPF projects should clearly aim to improve intra-regional communication and trade; stresses the need for closer coordination in order to ensure effective complementarity, coherence and efficiency of assistance in the Western Balkans; believes that these coordinated loan/grant facilities should be directed in particular towards the potential candidate countries which do not have access to funds from all five components of the Instrument for Pre- Accession Assistance (IPA);
Amendment 64 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Underlines the importance of promoting people-to-people contacts between the Western Balkan countries and the EU, as well as between all the countries of south-east Europe;
Amendment 73 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Expresses its solidarity with the countries of the Western Balkans in the global economic crisis and reaffirms its support for the economic and social consolidation of the region; welcomes, therefore, the recent proposal by the Commission to extend its Economic Recovery Plan for the Western Balkans and urges it to remain vigilant and, if necessary, to adopt adequate measures in order to guarantee the smooth continuation of the Stabilisation and Association process;
Amendment 85 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Recalls that mutual respect and domestic dialogue based on compromise between different ethnic groups is the only way forward for the Western Balkans; therefore urges all the parties concerned to remain committed to implementing existing inter-ethnic agreements and to continue to search for peaceful solutions to any conflicts that may arise;
Amendment 93 #
2008/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the governments and parliaments of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia, Serbia and UNMIK/Kosovo (under UN Security Council resolution 1244), the Chairman-in- office of the OSCE, the President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, the Chairman of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, the President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the secretariat of the Regional Cooperation Council, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the secretariat of the Central European Free Trade Agreement.
Amendment 1 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to its resolutions of 14 February 2007 on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners1, of 16 February 2006 on Guantánamo2 and of 12 December 2007 on the fight against terrorism3;
Amendment 2 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
Amendment 17 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the transatlantic partnership is founded on shared core values such as democracy, human rights, the rule of law and, international institutions as well as openlaw and multilateralism, as well as market-based economies and sustainable development,
Amendment 20 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the EU and the US play key roles in the world's politics and economy, and share responsibility for promoting peace, stability, good governance and international justice, respect for human rights and stabilitythe rule of law, and for tackling, especially within the framework of the United Nations, various global dangers and challenges, such as the deep financial crisis, the eradication of poverty and fulfilment of other MDGs, climate change, energy security, international piracy, terrorism and nuclear proliferation,
Amendment 25 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the European Union and the United States of America recognise the need for further cooperation to tackle international terrorism; whereas the fight against terrorism must comply with international law and democratic values, fully respecting civil liberties and fundamental human rights;
Amendment 34 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas the transatlantic partnership andis an important tool for political cooperation and coordination, while NATO are indispensable for collectivemains important for our common security,
Amendment 38 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas the transatlantic economy remains at the forefront of globalisation and whereas the progressive integration of the transatlantic market can help to regulate this process; whereas the work of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) nehas proveds to continube useful in providing input and guidance sto as to integrate the transatlantic market; whereas joint leadership isthe EU-US Summits on priorities for pursuing transatlantic economic integration; whereas a constructive stance and fruitful cooperation are needed to reform the international economic institutions in the current crisis,
Amendment 84 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls for enhanced cooperation between the EU and the US and recommends a comprehensive approach to crisis management; supports closer EU-NATO relations, with a view to better addressing a wide range of issues of common interest relating to crisis management, in conformity with the UN Charter, whilst remaining open to cooperation with other nations and other multilateral organisations as appropriate,
Amendment 89 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on both partners to jointly lead the multilateral efforts, launched at the Washington Conference on 15 November 2008, to resolve the current financial crisis and to reform the international financial system, the World Bank, the regional banks and the IMF, while resisting protectionism and promoting fair trade, inter alia through a successful conclusion of the WTO Doha round, which should contribute to the achievement of the UN Millennium Development Goals;
Amendment 107 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Underlines that a peaceful settlement of the Middle East conflict is vital, and hopes that it willis counting on this representing one of the most urgent priorities of the new US administration, coordinating closely with the EU and engaging in the Quartet; emphasises that both partners should strive for intensification of the negotiations based on the road map and the Annapolis Conference achievements, aimed at arriving at a two-state solution; urges both partners to redouble their efforts, also within the Quartet and in their dealingscooperation with Arab countries, so that a durable ceasefire in Gaza may be quickly achieved, in accordance with UN Security Council resolution 1860 (2009);
Amendment 126 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Urges both parties to closely coordinate their policies towards Russiawork together with Russia on major regional and global issues of mutual concern; conscious of Russia's relevance as a neighbouring country, of its interdependence with the EU and of its role as a global player, emphasises the importance of building up constructive cooperation with Russia, without compromising democratic principles, human rights standards or international law; calls on both transatlantic partners to closely coordinate their approach towards any reform of the European security architecture, while recognising the central role of NATO, insisting on the OSCE principles as its inalienable base and maintaining the coherence of NATOpromoting disarmament;
Amendment 151 #
2008/2199(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Underlines the importance of fighting terrorism on the basis of full respect for international law and human rights, and of supporting the role of the UN in combating this threat; welcomes the commitment of the new US- President to the closure of Camp Delta in Guantánamo Bay and the shutting-down of secret overseas CIA prisons, reviewing at the same time the legal and policy architecture for terrorism detainees and ending the CIA’s so-called “enhanced interrogation” regime; calls on those EU Member States capable of so doing to assist the US with the closure of Camp Delta, contributing also to the rehabilitation of former Guantánamo Bay detainees;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
– having regard to the Charter of the United Nations,
Amendment 2 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 b (new)
Citation 1 b (new)
– having regard to the North Atlantic Treaty, signed in Washington on 4 April 1949,
Amendment 3 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 c (new)
Citation 1 c (new)
– having regard to Title V of the Treaty on European Union,
Amendment 5 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 e (new)
Citation 1 e (new)
– having regard to the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 and ratified by the great majority of the EU Member States,
Amendment 9 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas according to the UN Charter the overall responsibility for international peace and security lies with the UN Security Council; whereas the Charter provides the legal basis for the creation of NATO; whereas, by signing the North Atlantic Treaty, NATO member states affirmed their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter, committing themselves to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations,
Amendment 10 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the EU Member States recognise in the UN system the fundamental framework for international relations; whereas they remain committed to the preservation of peace and the strengthening of international security, in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter, as well as the principles of the Helsinki Final Act and the objectives of the Paris Charter, and to the development and consolidation of democracy and the rule of law, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; whereas the EU Member States have set as a priority measures to reform and strengthen the United Nations Organization in order to make it capable of fulfilling its responsibilities and acting effectively in providing solutions to global challenges and responding to key threats,
Amendment 16 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas NATO is an intergovernmental organisationalliance of democratic nations, in which civilians decide and the military executes; whereas NATO does not characterise itself as a regional organisation and does not assume any obligations analogous to those laid down by Article 54 of the UN Charter, requiring the presentation of periodical reports on its military activities to the Security Council,
Amendment 19 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas 94 per cent of the EU population are NATO citizeall EU and NATO members form part of the United Nations, and 21 EU Member States out of 27 are NATO allies, and 21 NATO allies out of 26 are EU Member States, while 6 EU Member States are neutral or non-members of NATO,
Amendment 21 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Amendment 38 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas EU-NATO relations could be further improved by both organisations, withespecially in the case of simultaneous presence on the field; whereas ways could be sought for the EU to involvinge the European non- EU NATO Allies further in ESDP and for NATO to involvinge the non- NATO EU Member States further in EU- NATO talks; whereas EU-US relations should be strengthened in order to further consolidate the existence of democratic freedoms,
Amendment 44 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas NATO and the EU enlargement processes are both based on political criteria, such as democracy, respect for human rights and the rule of law; whereas in practice the two organisations have adopted a different approach to those principles, as exemplified by the early admission of certain problematic countries to NATO; whereas the two processes should be mutually reinforcing and coordinated in order to promote democracy and secure stability and prosperity in the European continent,
Amendment 54 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
Amendment 126 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Insists that all democracies should be united in their efforts to build stability and peace, and thus join with all intergovernmental organisations in promoting these goals; regrets profoundly that the doctrine of non-alignment, inherited from the Cold War era, undermines the alliance of democracies to the benefit of undemocratic and not yet truly democratic powers; regrets that, in the name of a doctrine of non-alignment, certain Member States opted out of the joint responsibility provided for by the solidarity clause contained in the Treaty of Lisb, especially the United Nations;
Amendment 135 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recognises the fundamental role of NATO, in the past as well as today, in the security architecture of the Europe; notes that for the majority of EU Member States, which are also NATO allies, the Alliance remains the foundation of their collective defence; , withe refore takes the view that the only meaningful way to organise the future collective spect to the institutional, functional and substantive autonomy of the EU and without prejudice to its indefpence of the EU is within the Alliancedent operability in the field of the ESDP;
Amendment 157 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12c. Regrets Turkey's objections to the implementation of the EU-NATO strategic cooperation based on and going beyond the Berlin Plus Agreement, and calls on Turkey, as a candidate for EU accession, to review its attitude and to cooperate constructively with a view to a more efficient coordination of efforts between the two organisations;
Amendment 255 #
2008/2197(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Is of the view that, should Russia become a free and truly democratic country, an improved cooperation between it and all cooperation with Russia is very important for security and peace in Europe an, Euro-Atlantic and global structures would be very welcome and should be encouraged; does not exclude the prospect of Russia's membership of such structures one day; therefore invites Russia to return to the path of transforming itself into a true democracy, and to root out all practices of using violence as a means of furthering political goals; notesd in the common neighbourhood; considers that the EU and NATO member states should be united, but at the same time open to discussions with Russia in the search of more effective collective security mechanisms; welcomes, therefore, the proposal by President Medvedev to organise a pan-European summit in order to take a comprehensive look at security problems, with the possibility of developing a Treaty on European Security that, should the EU Member States agree to the bilateral security arrangements recently proposed by Russia, this would not only severely weaken the integrity of the security architecture of the EU but would also drive a wedgeat all events dovetail with the legal framework of the UN Charter and its principles of collective security; expresses, however, great concern about the use of force by both sides involved in the Georgian crisis, and regrets the disappointing developments into the relationship between the EU and the U.S.field of democratic reform and respect of human rights in Russia;
Amendment 4 #
2008/2157(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that fighting illegal immigration is arom the fundamental point of view of protecting human rights, fighting illegal immigration, together with the management and protection of all EU borders, are high priorityies for the European Union, and considers it crucial in this connection that Frontex should conclude operational cooperation agreements with the border control authorities of countries which have common borders with the European Union, together with exchanges of best practices and measures to encourage day to day cooperation between border control authorities, and with those of countries which, according to a wide range of risk analyses, are regarded as transit countries for illegal immigration;
Amendment 15 #
2008/2157(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Considers cooperation between Frontex , the Member States and third countries necessary in order to dismantle illegal immigration networks;
Amendment 20 #
2008/2157(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers it necessary that Frontex should, as soon as possible, immediately reach an agreement with the authorities of Turkey and that the Turkish national police, the gendarmerie and the Coast Guard Command should all be involved in this future cooperation, given that large numbers of illegal immigrants enter Greece from this country on a daily basis; advocates systematic and thorough evaluation of the implementation of a future agreement between Frontex and the Turkish authorities; notes in this connection that the last round of negotiations on a repatriation agreement between the European Union and Turkey dates back to December 2006 and that the European Commission even openly acknowledges that the negotiations have reached a complete impasse;
Amendment 26 #
2008/2157(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that negotiations on an agreement between Frontex and the border control authorities of a third State, and more particularly a candidate Member State, and particularly an accession country, are conducted against the background of the political and economic relations which exist between the European Union as a whole and the State in question and that active refusal by a State to cooperate with Frontex must have direct consequences for those relations;
Amendment 28 #
2008/2157(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Reminds third countries to implement strictly existing bilateral agreements and readmission protocols which they have concluded with the EU Member States;
Amendment 2 #
2008/2149(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 21 #
2008/2149(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Given that the international financial crisis has reached Europe and may have indirect effect on trade and foreign investment in the Western Balkans, calls on the Commission to monitor developments and, if necessary, to adopt adequate measures in order to guarantee the smooth continuation of the Stabilisation and Association process (SAP), which is an important factor for stability in the region and in the best interests of the EU itself.
Amendment 1 #
2008/2135(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1.Welcomes India's increasing global geopolitical strength as the world's largest democracy Reiterates the importance of a strategic partnership between the EU and India, a partnership firmly based on shared values of democracy and human rights, fundamental freedoms, pluralism, the rule of law and multilateralism; welcomes India's commitment, shared by the EU, to combating terrorism and to promoting international peace and security;
Amendment 3 #
2008/2135(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. WBelcomieves the strategic partnership which assigns a pivotal importance to EU- India relations; believes that, over the longer term, India will only grow in attractiveness as a trading partnerat, over the longer term, India will only grow in attractiveness as a trading partner and will increase its geopolitical importance; welcomes therefore the commitment, expressed during the ninth European Union - India Summit held in Marseille on 29 September 2008, to further develop their political exchanges and cooperation;
Amendment 12 #
2008/2135(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the existence of an annual local-level EU-India human rights dialogue but is concerned about the slow pace at which India is implementing ILO labour standards, particularly in connection with child and bonded labour; calls on India to do more to improve the treatment of women, and to deal with the issue of the death penalty and the persecution of and discrimination against religious minorities;
Amendment 7 #
2008/2132(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas coastal regions are extremely important for the European Union, since a significant percentage of economic activity is concentrated in them,
Amendment 33 #
2008/2132(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for incentives to be provided for sustainable development, so as to safeguard the cultural and natural heritage and the social fabric in coastal regions;
Amendment 37 #
2008/2132(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls for the creation of appropriate infrastructure, including communication and transport networks that operate all year round, in order to extend the tourist season;
Amendment 39 #
2008/2132(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Reiterates its call for incentives so that alterations can be made to ports in many coastal regions enabling access for pleasure vessels and cruise liners, as well as work that will significantly improve the environment, including work to cope with climate change;
Amendment 2 #
2008/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the GCCA must remainConsiders the GCCA to be an important pillar of the EU's external action on climate change and to constitute a complementary and supportive platform for the ongoing process in the context of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, serving to advance the implementation of the Convention and the Protocol and of agreements related thereto;
Amendment 4 #
2008/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a new
Paragraph 2 a new
Amendment 8 #
2008/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Regards it as vital for the EU to continue to lead the global fight against climate change, which may lead ; calls for an effectively coordinater alia to security threats and substantial migratory movements, and for itd global approach by the EU, other major international actors and multilateral organisations, in order to attain the targets set by the Kyoto Protocol; fully supports the ongoing efforts to forge a multilateral post-2012 framework for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and looks forward to the creation of a comprehensive and more equitable climate-change regime;
Amendment 13 #
2008/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers it necessary to mainstream the fight against climate change into all of the EU's external relations; believes that the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy has enormous potential to play an important role in enhancing the EU's capacity to prevent and deal with conflicts accentuated by climate change, such as territorial disputes and tensions over access to natural resources, such as water, and natural disasters; considers that further ways should be examined of integrating climate change adaptation into already existing external policies and financial instruments; invites the High Representative to take forward, with the Commission, his initial reflection on "international security and climate change" in the context of the forthcoming update of the European Security Strategy;
Amendment 17 #
2008/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the EU should further step up its dialogue with its neighbours as well as major industrialised countries, in order to involve them in adaptation and mitigation efforts; suggests that the EU should further integrate climate change adaptation into its regional strategies, in particular the European Neighbourhood Policy, the Black Sea Strategy and, the EU- Africa Strategy, Euro-Mediterranean cooperation and the Cotonou Agreement, while giving particular attention to the regions most vulnerable to security risks related to climate change;
Amendment 18 #
2008/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a new
Paragraph 5 a new
5a. Calls on the Commission to give priority to promoting sustainable energy supplies in the context of development aid and, in particular, in strategies for combating poverty;
Amendment 19 #
2008/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b new
Paragraph 5 b new
5b. Stresses the importance of energy efficiency and renewable sources of energy for development cooperation;
Amendment 20 #
2008/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c new
Paragraph 5 c new
5c. Calls on the European Commission to ensure that development-assistance strategies are consistent with the aims of environmental protection and sustainable management of global natural resources, given the consideration that economic growth, energy security and climate change are fundamental and interlinked challenges; calls on the Commission to explore ways to mobilise new financial resources, to ensure that the conditions for general budget support (including under the 'Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) contracts') explicitly take account of climate-change and energy- security considerations, according to the principle of shared but differentiated responsibility between countries, and also to provide for increased transfers of new environmentally friendly technologies to developing countries;
Amendment 21 #
2008/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 2 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
– having regard to the Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context,
Amendment 3 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Citation 6 b (new)
Citation 6 b (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 8 July 2008 on the environmental impact of the planned gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea to link up Russia and Germany1,
Amendment 8 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Citation 7
Citation 7
− having regard to the EU-Russia human rights consultations and their lack of tangible results commitments of the two parties as members of the Council of Europe and the OSCE,
Amendment 9 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the protocols thereto,
Amendment 13 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas EU relations with Russia aremain very of strategic importantce for the purposes of pragmatic cooperation,; whereas Russia is a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a member of the G8, the third largest trading partner of the EU, the fourth largest trade partner of the Eurozone and an essential energy supplier to the EU; and whereas the EU shares with Russia not only economic and trade interests but also an objective to act in the international arena, as well as in the common European neighbourhood; whereas enhanced cooperation and good- neighbourly relations between the EU and Russia should be of key importance to the stability, security and prosperity of the whole of Europe,
Amendment 28 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU regarded as disproportionate Russia’s massive counterattack, triggered by the Georgian troops enter’ use of violence ing South Ossetia, extended to the other Georgian territories with the massive use of armour and air power, as well as the unprovoked massive military action in Abkhazia, including attacks and occupation of Georgian seaports, followed by the recognition of the two breakaway enclaves, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, puts a question mark on the viability of the idea of building together with Russia a common space of security in Europeand condemned the following decision of Moscow to recognise the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia; whereas these developments cast a shadow over, and continue to influence, the EU-Russia relationship,
Amendment 38 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas Russia should havecooperation between the EU and Russia is beneficial for the international balance; whereas also Russia has a responsibility to contribute to financial and political stability and the sense of security in Europe and in the world, in particular in the shared neighbourhood but also as regards; whereas the EU engages already with Russia on Afghanistan, the Middle East, the Balkans and in the UN and the OSCE, developing common views and approaches on other key security issues, such as nuclear proliferation, arms control, the fight against terrorism, drug trafficking and organised crime, as well as the climate change,
Amendment 44 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the negotiations on a new agreement aimed at enhancing cooperation between the EU and the Russian Federation should address the issue of the full compliance by Russia within no way legitimises the current status quo in Georgia, while the obligation for Russia to implement fully the agreements signed on 12 August and 8 September 2008 in respect of the conflict in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, since its compliance with these agreements should be an indispensable condition for the successful completion of the talk remains valid; whereas the Geneva process should continue its important work with a view to a common acceptable solution that re- establishes security and stability in the region and permits the return of internally displaced persons and refugees to their homes,
Amendment 47 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, in particular after the events in Georgia, positions on Kosovo and the common neighbourhood remain farther apart,
Amendment 48 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas at the closely watched 45th Munich Security Conference many leaders spoke in favour of a rapprochement with Russia, recognising also the need for a new understanding with Russia regarding fundamental issues of European and global security,
Amendment 55 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the new comprehensivepartnership agreement designed to replace the current PCA must represent an improvement in quality and create a comprehensive framework reflecting the whole breadth of the cooperation, the new realities of the 21st century, as well as compliance with the principles of international relations and respect for democratic norms and human rights; whereas additional agreements are needed to embrace in detail all sectors of cooperation,
Amendment 109 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point b
Paragraph 1 - point b
b) reiterate the commitments that both the EU and Russia have agreed upon at international level, notably as members of the Council of Europe and the OSCE, and raise with the Russian Government concerns about the situation of human rights and the shrinking space for Russia’s civil society and, urgeing it to uphold freedom of expression and association by bringing legislation regulating civil society into line with Russia’s European and international commitments, and to take prompt and effective steps to foster a favourable working climate for human rights organisations;
Amendment 126 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point c e (new)
Paragraph 1 - point c e (new)
ce) stress the need for constructive cooperation with transit countries and insist on the opportunity of a trilateral agreement between the EU, Russia and Ukraine concerning the transit of gas from Russia to the EU in order to guarantee security of supply in the coming years; draw attention in this regard to the dispute settlement mechanism contained in the Energy Charter Treaty, already signed by the two partners of the EU;
Amendment 130 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point d a (new)
Paragraph 1 - point d a (new)
da) underline the need for proper environmental impact assessments for all energy-related infrastructure projects, in order to guarantee that international standards of environment protection are met; urge in this regard the Russian Federation to ratify the Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context and the protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment thereto;
Amendment 134 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point d b (new)
Paragraph 1 - point d b (new)
db) upgrade the existing political dialogue encouraging discussion of ‘hard security issues’, which often are at the core of the disagreements between the EU and Russia but undoubtedly affect European and global security, stressing the need for multilateral arms control and reduction, as well as for non-proliferation regimes;
Amendment 141 #
2008/2104(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 - point h
Paragraph 1 - point h
h) insist that the goal of visa-free travel vis-à-vis Russia beis a long-term puersued in the light of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001, which states that exemption from a visa requirement should be subject to a considered assessment of a variety of criteria relating inter alia topective and must be negotiated by experts within the already agreed four thematic blocks, notably document security including biometrics, illegal immigration including readmission, public policyorder and security, and the EU’s well as external relations with third countrie; urge Russia to commence dialogue on the forth block; demonstrate goodwill to negotiate more flexible conditions, consideration being also given to the imp the basis of reciprocity, for special categories of citizens of the Russian Federation, such as those provided in the visa facilictations of regional coherence and reciprocity; agreements of the EU with the Western Balkans countries,
Amendment 4 #
2008/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that peace and stability are beneficial for development progress, but that, at the same time, development is important for lasting peace; notes that the absence of hostilities that marks post- conflict situations does not automatically lead to entrenched and lasting stability and that the revival of a sustainable economic process is essential for the creation of peace conditions;
Amendment 18 #
2008/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reiterates the conclusions of the paper on Climate Change and International Security1, presented in March 2008 to the European Council by the High Representative of the EU and the European Commission, warning that climate change threatens to overburden states and regions of the world which are already fragile and conflict-prone, creating new immigration flows and intensifying security risks for the EU; urges the Commission to take climate change considerations into account in its peace-building efforts;
Amendment 42 #
2008/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that the European Union's approach to immigration makes the situation worse in the countries of origin by closing European borders and calls for a more constructive approach with regard to migration and asylum, providing greater flexibility in admitting people from the fragile states in question until the situation on the ground permits safe repatriation;
Amendment 50 #
2008/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that there should be no military component to development aid and that the aid should always be in accordance with international law and in line with the United Nations; notes with interest the experience of the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission; expresses its concern at the current approach adopted by donors who do not take local views into account but work on the basis of Western models; considers that African solutions should be applied to African problems and urges the EU to cooperate closely with the African Union to this end.
Amendment 25 #
2008/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Reiterates that the future office of High Representative/Vice–President of the Commission will derive its legitimacy directly from the European Parliament; therefore invites him/her to build upon the current practice and appear regularly before Parliament in plenary and before its Committee on Foreign Affairs, as well as to participate in meetings, in order to hold regular, systematic and substantive consultations with Parliament and its competent bodies, and to involve Parliament in the decision-making process, thus enhancing the transparency and accountability of the Union's foreign policy;
Amendment 63 #
2008/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Demands a larger role for Parliament in international agreements dealing with foreign policy matters and calls for it to be informed promptly and as fully as possible throughout negotiations for the conclusion thereof;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights and the protocols thereto,
Amendment 2 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 b (new)
Citation 2 b (new)
– having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the two optional protocols thereto,
Amendment 8 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas this sanctions policy is based principally on the five following objectives of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP): to safeguard the common values, fundamental interests, independence and integrity of the Union in conformity with the principles of the United Nations Charter; to strengthen the security of the Union in all ways; to preserve peace and strengthen international security, in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter and the Helsinki Final Act, and the objectives of the Paris Charter, including those on external borders; to promote international cooperation; to develop and consolidate democracy and the rule of law and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Amendment 9 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas, similarly, the EU leads the way in combating climate change; whereas international consensus is growing that any serious and voluntary damage caused to the environment undermines world peace and security and constitutes a violation of human rights,
Amendment 11 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the EU sanctions policy therefore incorporates or follows UN Security Council sanctions, but its scope and objectives are broader than those of the UN Security Council policy (international peace and security),
Amendment 16 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas, with the sole exception of the case of South Africa, the effectiveness of sanctions has been very limited; whereas sanctions are one of a range of instruments which the EU may use to implement its policy on human rights; recalling that the use of sanctions must be part of an integrated and comprehensive policy approach and must be consistent with the Union's overall strategy in the area concerned,
Amendment 25 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital R
Recital R
R. whereas the introduction and implementation of restrictive measures is based on a series of principles such as respect for international law, human rights and fundamental freedomsmust be in line with the human rights and humanitarian principles enshrined in international law, including due process and the right to an effective remedy, as well as proportionality, and must provide for appropriate exemptions to take account of basic human needs of the targeted persons; whereas a sanctions regime has to take fully into account the standards established by the Geneva Convention, the Convention of the Rights of the Child and the Covenant on Economic, Social and Political Rights, as well as the UN resolutions concerning the protection of civilians and of children in armed conflict; whereas other relevant documents of the United Nations (such as the Machel Report, the Statements and the guidelines of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee) could contribute to the aim of more targeted sanctions,
Amendment 39 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Takes the view that any voluntary and irreversible degradation of the environment constitutes a threat to peace and security and a serious violation of human rights, whether it is caused by government policy or by the actions of non-state actors, such as multinationals; in this connection, calls on the Council and the Commission to include any voluntary and irreversible damage caused to the environment among the grounds which may lead to the adoption of sanctions and to intensify the efforts towards the creation of a global climate change regime;
Amendment 41 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 68 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Council, in the absence of UN Security Council sanctions, to cooperate with other sanctioning states, share information and coordinate action in order to ensure the widest possible action at international level and to maximise the effectiveness and implementation of EU sanctions in conformity with international law;
Amendment 69 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Considers that the EU should seek cooperation with other regional organisations, such as the African Union and ASEAN, in order to promote human rights and assure coordination of actions on sanctions;
Amendment 81 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Recognises that states should be accountable for internationally wrongful acts and underlines the need for a judicial control mechanism with a view to guaranteeing the implementation of sanctions in conformity with international law and humanitarian law;
Amendment 82 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 b (new)
Paragraph 29 b (new)
29b. Considers that an indiscriminate economic embargo in respect of a country constitutes a violation of human rights, and strongly condemns any embargo in respect of basic medicines, an unacceptable practice which affects mostly innocent children;
Amendment 104 #
2008/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
Paragraph 48
48. DTakes note of the resolution on UN and EU blacklisting procedures for terrorist suspects adopted by a substantial majority on 23 January 2008 by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), which states that those procedures violate basic rights; deeply regrets that none of the judicial bodies is in position to assess the appropriateness of blacklisting, given that the evidence leading to blacklisting is based purely on information held by the secret services; calls in this regard on EU Member States to allow an effective parliamentary control over the work of the secret services;
Amendment 23 #
2008/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7a (new)
Paragraph 7a (new)
7a. Stresses the social and cultural role of ports for the population of the hinterland and considers it essential to improve public awareness of the importance of ports as means of development;
Amendment 32 #
2008/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10a (new)
Paragraph 10a (new)
10a. Calls on the Commission to study port safety issues anew and to factor in the increased cost in regard to the competitiveness of European ports;
Amendment 40 #
2008/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Urges the Commission to pursue research and innovation in this sector under the Union’s framework programmes and calls on the Commission and Member States to support research into safety issues, so as to keep accidents to a minimum, into logistics, so as to improve the use of space in ports, and into environmental questions, so as; stresses the need to reduce air pollution as a means of combating climate change; calls for cleaner ships’ fuel in order to curb CO2 emissions, and further measures against pollution caused by waste;·
Amendment 42 #
2008/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14a (new)
Paragraph 14a (new)
14a. Considers there is a need for the further development of the «Clean ship» and «Clean port» programmes;
Amendment 50 #
2008/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16a (new)
Paragraph 16a (new)
16a. Calls for appropriate financial incentives to maintain port infrastructure and maritime transport in the island and remote regions of the Union;
Amendment 51 #
2008/2007(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17a (new)
Paragraph 17a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission to review and improve policies to develop and support short sea shipping;
Amendment 4 #
2007/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Β. whereas the external dimension of this strategy involves the promotion of reforms, in line with European standards, the consolidation of democracy, of peace, and of stabilityimproved respect for human rights, stability in neighbouring countries and prosperity,
Amendment 23 #
2007/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the 2003 European Council held in Thessaloniki and the 2006 European Council held in Brussels reaffirmed its intention to respect its commitments to the countries of south- eastern Europe and the western Balkans;
Amendment 61 #
2007/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas these policies should be complementary and mutually permeable, that is to say, should allow a given country to move from one type of contractual relationship with the EU to another, should it so wish, if the necessary internal and external conditions are fulfilled,
Amendment 87 #
2007/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Reaffirms its firm commitment to the countries with which it has started membership negotiations and recalls the clearly stated prospects of accession to the EU offered by the European Council in Thessaloniki in 2003 to the countries of the western Balkans and to the countries which have been given clear membership prospects, with the understanding that full compliance with the Copenhagen criteria and compatibility with the Union's integration capacity must be fulfilled before these countries can join the Union;
Amendment 113 #
2007/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that the enlarged European Union must be endowed with funding commensurate with its ever more ambitious political objectives and its increased responsibilities both within and beyond its borders;
Amendment 170 #
2007/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Warns, therefore, that further enlargement without adequate consolidation could lead to a Union of multiple configurations, with core countries moving towards closer integration and others lying at its margins, and that this scenario would have seriously detrimental implications for the Union's capacity to act – since it would weaken its institutions, for the stability of some of its Member States – since it would make them more vulnerable to external pressure, and for its credibility as global actor – since it would undermine its already precarious unity in external affairs;
Amendment 201 #
2007/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Suggests, therefore, that, as regards those eastern neighbours which, in view of their political, economic and social situation and of the Union's current integration capacity, at present do not enjoy membership prospects but at the same time fulfil certain democratic and economic conditions, the Union should establish an area based on common policies covering, in particular, economic and financial issues, trade, energy, transport, environmental issues, the rule of law, justice, security, migration and education; takes the view that these common policies, whilst striving gradually to achieve EU standards and opening the way for closer integration of these countries, should be shaped jointly withmust take account of the views of the participating countries on the basis of specific decision-making mechanisms, and should be underpinned by adequate financial assistance;
Amendment 227 #
2007/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Believes at the same time that countries which enjoy clear membership prospects but still have considerable ground to cover before they can attain the political, economic and social conditions necessary to achieve candidate status, could usefully benefit from an incremental approach in their EU integration process and that this approach could involve, besides increased assistance and cooperation measures, voluntary participation in arrangements similar to the above bilateral or multilateral framework as an intermediate step towards full membership;
Amendment 17 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1α. Recalls the need for the continuous implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement as an instrument for promoting transnational confidence- building, which is the key to stability in the region;
Amendment 22 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 55 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls that much remains to be done in the short term in the fields of reforming the judiciary, strengthening the independence and the overall capacity of the judicial system and implementing anti-corruption legislation;
Amendment 60 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that there is scant progress with regard to water quality, but that the new water law can serve as a sound basis for improvement; again points to the great need to protect water quality and control pollution in the River Vardar, which drains most of the country and continues as the Axios carrying hazardous waste ton Greek territory as the Axíos, and the transfrontier lakes Ohridsko Ezero, Prespansko Ezero, Prespa and Dojransko Ezero, against pollution and to reach effective agreements on this with the neighbouring countries of Albania and Greece;
Amendment 64 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Draws attention to the fact that the attitude towards the environment in general needs to be significantly improved, and appeals to the authorities of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to bring its environmental legislation into line with accepted EU standards so as not to create serious problems in neighbouring countries;
Amendment 95 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that, in the years since independence, close economic relations have developed between the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Greece, that Greece is now the largest investor and trading partner and that Greece canhas already provided and continues to provide significant support for coping successfully with the process of accession to the European Union;
Amendment 108 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 123 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Points out that the Hellenic Republic (Greece), unlike in the first few years after its northern neighbour became independent in 1991 is nowis prepared, as a result of negotiations on a final settlement, to accept a composite, internationally recognised name for the state which contains the term 'Macedonia', provided that a distinction is made between it and the part of North Greece which is also called Macedonia;
Amendment 126 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14α. Calls on the government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to take the necessary steps and make a fresh effort to find a mutually acceptable solution regarding the name, within the framework of the United Nations, thereby contributing to good neighbourly relations and to a rapprochement with the EU;
Amendment 151 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on all authorities and organisations within the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to stop using symbols which its neighbour Greece regards asare closely associated with the history of the area in the north of Greece which is also designated Macedonia, in particular the name Alexander the Great or that of his father, Philip II, for inter alia the national airport at Petrovec, and erecting statues in the towns of Skopje, Prilep and Bitola;
Amendment 173 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that, of the three countries which have been European Union candidate Member States since 2005, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is the only country with which no accession negotiations have taken place to date, considers it desirable, insofar as the Copenhagen criteria are met, that this exceptional situation should end, and calls on the European Commission to develop a roadmap leading to commencement of those negotiations, after which, if there are no new domestic conflicts, the Council can take a decision in 2008 on a starting date for the negotiations;
Amendment 177 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A (new)
Recital A (new)
A. Bearing in mind that the EU/Western Balkans Declaration which was unanimously approved by all the Foreign ministers of the European Union and Foreign Ministers of the Western Balkan States in Salzburg on 11 March 2006, reiterates the importance of good neighbourly relations and the need to find mutually acceptable solutions to outstanding issues with neighbouring countries,
Amendment 181 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Thessaloniki European Council of 19-20 June 2003, at which the promise was made to all Western Balkan states that they would in the long term join the European Union,
Amendment 182 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1a (new)
Citation 1a (new)
- having regard to UN Security Council Resolutions 817 and 845 of 1993,
Amendment 184 #
2007/2268(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10a (new)
Citation 10a (new)
- having regard to the fact that a member state, Greece, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia are in the midst of a negotiation process taking place under aegis of the United Nations in order to reach a mutually acceptable solution to the name of the candidate state,
Amendment 1 #
2007/2267(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
- having regard to the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council of 10 December 2007 concerning Croatia,
Amendment 20 #
2007/2267(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. having regard to the conclusions of the 2003 European Council in Thessaloniki indicating that the future of all the western Balkan countries is effectively in the European Union, as confirmed in a number of European Parliament resolutions,
Amendment 21 #
2007/2267(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas the statement issued by the EU and the western Balkan countries unanimously approved by the Foreign Ministers of the European Union and the western Balkan countries on 11 March 2006 in Strasbourg underscores the importance of good neighbourly relations and the need to find mutually acceptable solutions to outstanding issues with neighbouring countries,
Amendment 24 #
2007/2267(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Congratulates the Croatian authorities on the positive results achieved so far, particularly with regard to the number of negotiation chapters which have been opened; observes that the pace of negotiations reflects progress in introducing the necessary reforms in each applicant country and that final accession procedures are conditioned by effective compliance with the Copenhagen criteria;
Amendment 55 #
2007/2267(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. RConsiders that international confidence-building measures are a key element in the stability of the country and the surrounding Balkan area; recalls the need to ensure adequate implementation of the Constitutional Law for National Minorities (CLNM), particularly with regard to bilingual teaching in schools and bilingualism in public administration and the planned employment guarantees concerning the adequate representation of minorities within the judiciary and public administration;
Amendment 26 #
2007/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Proposes that priority be given in 2008 to a limited number of subjects which better relate to the concerns of European citizens and to their expectations as regards the role to be played by the Union in international affairs; takes the view that those subjects are: security including energy security, climate change, migration management, human rights and civil liberties, and that they complement the priorities and objectives pursued by the Community's external action; in this context, welcomes the report by the Commission and the High Representative to the Council on climate change and international security; and underlines the importance of this issue; reaffirms the European Council's call to the Council to examine the report and to submit recommendations on appropriate follow- up action, in particular, on how to intensify, by December 2008 at the latest, cooperation with third countries and regions regarding the impact of climate change on international security;
Amendment 56 #
2007/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates that strengthening global governancemultilateral cooperation, international institutions and the value of international law remains a vital interest for the Union's external action; underlines in this regard the crucial role to be played by the United Nations and urges the Member States to press for an appropriate reform of the UN in support of more effective multilateralism, and; stresses that the Union must stand united while urging its partners to pursue the development and consolidation of democracy, human rights and the rule of law, as a common basis for a prosperous and secure world;
Amendment 72 #
2007/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Is of the view that, given the current situation in Serbia, dialogue with Belgrade should be based on concreteintensified and that concrete steps should be taken in order to reaffirm the European perspective of the country; considers the signing of the Stability and Association Agreement as a highly concrete move towards the future accession of Serbia to the EU; encourages substantial assistance and cooperation measures, and thatplaces particular emphasis should be placed onon the strengthening of ties with civil society in areas of common interest;
Amendment 83 #
2007/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Takes the view that the EULEX mission in Kosovo should safeguard the interests of national minorities in order to preserve the multi-ethnic character of the territory, build confidence among ethnic communities, protect the cultural, religious and historical heritage, consolidate the rule of law and promote economic development;
Amendment 163 #
2007/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the pressure of crises and conflicts beyond the EU's borders and the need to deal with alarming new challenges created by the rapid climate change suggest a wider perspective for the CFSP,
Amendment 168 #
2007/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 a (new)
Citation 18 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 18 anuary 20061 and to the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council of 10 March 2008 on Afghanistan,
Amendment 169 #
2007/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 22
Citation 22
– having regard to its resolutions of 15 November 2007 on the Bali Conference on Climate Change and of 29 November 2007 on trade and climate change, 1 2as well as to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 13-14 March 2008 on Climate Change and Energy and the paper presented to it by the High Representative of the EU and the European Commission, concerning Climate Change and International Security2, Or. en OJ C 287 E, 24.11.2006, p. 176. S113/08, 14 March 2008.
Amendment 5 #
2007/2118(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that energy security must be regarded as an essential component of the overall security of the European Union, whereby the definition of energy security should not be merely limited to the lack of internal EU production but should also take into account the geopolitical aspects of dependency on imports and the potential therein for politically motivated interruptionsand points out that Europe's energy interests are better served by a policy of diversification and the creation of synergies ensuring security of supply;
Amendment 15 #
2007/2118(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is of the opinion that Russia is an important partner of the EU in the field of energy and that Nord Stream is an infrastructure project with a wide political and strategic dimension for both the EU and Russia; underlines that it is primarily driven by Russian commercial and political interests, aimed at delivering gas straight from Russia to Western Europe, bypassing the transit states; underlines that this project increases Russia's energy leverage over the EU and its neighbours and decreases the abilityprojects of this kind should enhance regional cooperation and stability and asks the main contracting parties to take into consideration the anxieties and the legitimate interests of small littoral states to act as security providers inof the Baltic Sea; region; considers that since the project goes against the priorities of severaliterates that energy should not be used as a tool for the exertion of political pressure on transit and recipient countries; underlines that solidarity among EU Member States, it undermines the EU's ability to act as a unified entity andn the field of energy will help to strengthen the role of the Union in its external relations, and asks Member States to speak with one voice on energy issues;
Amendment 28 #
2007/2118(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Therefore asks the Commission and the Member States to put forward the following demands and to call for: - a thorough assessment of the various transparency, economic and budget-related aspects of Nord Stream and its affiliated companies; - a thorough legal assessment aimed at determining whether a broader set of legal framework is applicable; - a thorough assessment of the need for the project and consideration of all alternatives, includingusefulness of the Nord Stream project for the creation of a secure pipeline network in the northern part of Europe, including other ideas such as the Amber and Yamal II pipelines; - a truly independent environmental impact assessment, to be commissioned with the approval of all littoral Statesin which all littoral States are involved and cooperate actively; - Ratification of, and commitment to the full implementation of the provisions of, the Espoo Convention and the Energy Charter Treaty, including its Transit Protocol, as an act of good faith and to encourage the Russian Fedin order to enhance international cooperation in assessing the environmental impact in a transboundary context and to lay down clear and transparent rules for internation's confidence in the projectal energy transit flows; - opportunities for equal participation by all the littoral States;
Amendment 52 #
2007/2118(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that the Member States should actively consider enacting legislation which includes geopolitical security aspects of energy agreements, as well as the human rights clause in commercial arrangements with third countries;