BETA

6 Amendments of Victor BOŞTINARU related to 2009/2230(INI)

Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the need for an environmental impact assessment of the Northern Gas Pipeline and other similar projects as well as the need to ensure that the construction of the pipeline does not affect, the results of which must be communicated without further delay to the European Parliament; calls on the European Commission for the design of an adequate reaction plan for technical accidents and any other possible catastrophes, providing also for the way to deal with these events from the economic point of view; underlines that the same approach must be taken for any future similar project, so that safety, environment and shipping conditions adverselyre not endangered;
2010/03/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Draws attention to the significant economic disproportion that exists in the Baltic Sea Region and in terms of economy and innovation, and to the necessity to increase the potential of highly developed areas and eliminate inequality in order to create a permanentof eliminating this disparity; believes that in order to reach this aim, it is necessary to increase and exploit the potential of all areas, including the more developed ones, as they can help pulling the less advantageous regions, thus creating a durable area of common prosperity with a high level of competitiveness, which is crucial in the face of an aging population;
2010/03/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the renewal and deepening of relations as par, in the context of the Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region between the European Union and neighbouring countries not belonging to the Union whose territories are part of the functional spaces of a given macro-region or affectas well as of the future macro-regional strategies, of the relations between the European Union and the non-EU states whose territories are part of the functional spaces in question, so that they can be adequately involved and consequently contribute towards a full achievement of the objectives of those spaces directlytrategies;
2010/03/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Believes that in order to achieve an effective protection of the environment and of biodiversity, agreements should be reached with the non-EU states that are part of the functional areas interested by the strategies, so that they can share the same values, rights and duties contained in the relevant European Union legislation;
2010/03/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Considers that the idea of macro- regions combines the considerable potential for optimising the response to the challenges and problems appearing in a given region with that of usingan effective and efficient use of the resources available;
2010/03/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. For the benefit of future macro-regional strategies, draws attention to the need for the European Commission to remake sure it solves the issue of its own appropriatehaving adequate internal human and financial resources, in order to be able to fulfil its duties, including the supervision of the implementation of the strategies;
2010/03/30
Committee: REGI