7 Amendments of Victor BOŞTINARU related to 2011/2035(INI)
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Sees macroregional strategies as affording a major opportunity to harness forms of trans-regional potential and adopt a joint approach to challenges stemming from the natural environment, e.g. in relation to environmental protectionwards common challenges, thus permitting a more efficient, balanced and sustainable development; considers that better coordination of existing support mechanisms can create scope for more targeted use of the EU Structural Funds;
Amendment 335 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
Amendment 391 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Points out that the exchange of best practices between the regions must be further strengthened, in consideration of the fact that it helps pursuing the objectives of a better and more efficient use of the funds; calls for the creation and timely implementation of programmes favouring this type of exchange, following the example of the Erasmus for elected local and regional representatives, for which requests that it is swiftly put into effects;
Amendment 402 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. Calls for the funding under investment partnerships to be made conditional on the implementation of reforms by the Member Stateto be linked to conditionalities set out in the development and investment partnership contracts, requesting Member States to undertake reforms, in order to ensure that it isfunds are used efficiently in areas directly related to cohesion policy; considers it fair for such conditions to include, in particular, full implementation of existing EU legislation (e.g. on price regulation, tendering procedures, transport, the environment and health) in order to prevent irregularities and ensure effectiveness; rejects, however, the imposition of conditions requiring Member States to undertake fundamental social and economic reform;
Amendment 432 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
Paragraph 41
41. Considers that the maximum level of support must not exceed 75%, otherwise applications will be driven less by the case for the projects than by the prospect of the funding they can attractalls on the Commission to examine and to establish the most appropriate maximum level of support on the basis of a thorough analysis of the development situation and the specific needs of the regions in the framework of each objective, in order to ensure that applications will respond to the real needs of each region and will aim to sustainable results in a long-term perspective; calls for it to be made easier for regions to use private co- financing and market-oriented credit options to cover their share of project financing;
Amendment 473 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 a (new)
Paragraph 46 a (new)
46a. Supports the creation of a flexibility reserve established on the basis of appropriations automatically de- committed during the programming period, and aimed at triggering the Structural Funds in an economic, social or environmental crisis in conjunction with the Globalisation Adjustment Fund and the European Union Solidarity Fund;
Amendment 517 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53
Paragraph 53
53. Envisages thatCalls for the Commission will, in future, haveto have, already in the next programming period, a greater responsibility for the improvement of national administrative procedures; takes the view, therefore, that it will be incumbent on the Commission to implement accreditation procedures for national or federal-state administrative and auditing bodies; envisages linkage between, on the one hand,considers, that a successful accreditation and a reduction in the error rate and, on the other,should lead to the entitlement to simplified and less frequent reporting;