BETA

5 Amendments of Victor BOŞTINARU related to 2012/2104(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
2. Urges the Member States to balance the needs of a healtake all the measures required to safeguard thye economy with those of the environnvironment and encourage sustainable development; emphasises that local communities must have a strong say in deciding the best balance between the needs of people and the needs of wildlife;
2012/11/14
Committee: PETI
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that, since citizens and residents of Member States are best placed to judge the most appropriate priorities for their local neighbourhoods, the subsidiarity principle should be applied to environmental issues wherever possible and that consideration should be given to consulting the citizens concerned before any political decision is taken which would have an impact on their immediate environment;
2012/11/14
Committee: PETI
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that the ‘gold-plating’ of EU environmental legislation by Member States can have a perverse effect in terms of reducing the acceptance of such legislation; calls on the Member States to go further than required by EU directives only where there is a clear and popularly accepted need to do so;deleted
2012/11/14
Committee: PETI
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the overwhelming need to develop new clean energy production capacities in the EU; recognises that this cannot be done without some impact on the environment, and urges the Union and the Member States to prioritise good landscaping post-production;
2012/11/14
Committee: PETI
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Applauds the introduction of environmental impact assessments; nevertheless, urges that they be developed in full coherence with more traditional impact assessments, in particular with respect to their effect on the needs of small businesses and residents, as well as on flora and fauna and calls on the Member States to ensure that the relevant legislation is implemented more effectively, taking better account of the needs of small businesses and residents and of flora and fauna; expresses concern at the slowness with which Member States often carry out such assessments and calls, in the context of the future revision of the directive, for guarantees to be introduced concerning their impartiality and objectivity;
2012/11/14
Committee: PETI