BETA

Activities of Ramona Nicole MĂNESCU related to 2010/2155(INI)

Plenary speeches (1)

5th cohesion report and strategy for the post-2013 cohesion policy - Implementation of cohesion policy programmes for 2007-2013 - European urban agenda and its future in cohesion policy - Objective 3: future agenda for cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation - Increased effectiveness between ERDF and other structural funds (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2155(INI)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on Objective 3: a challenge for territorial cooperation – the future agenda for cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation PDF (216 KB) DOC (132 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: REGI
Dossiers: 2010/2155(INI)
Documents: PDF(216 KB) DOC(132 KB)

Amendments (8)

Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Reminds that multi-level governance is a precondition for achieving territorial cohesion in Europe and calls for this principle to be made compulsory for Member States in order to ensure balanced territorial development in line with the subsidiarity principle;
2011/02/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines the crucial role of territorial co-operation in delivering the EU2020 objectives; Calls for forward thinking to ascertain the strategic needs of each border region in connection with the Europe 2020is strategy, and, subsequently, for European territorial cooperation to be integrated in, and tailored to, all levels of strategic planning: European, national, and regional;
2011/02/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Reiterates that involving sub- national actors in the achievement of the EU objectives is a precondition to effectively implement territorial cohesion.
2011/02/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that greater complementarity between the ‘territorial cooperation’ objective, on the one hand, and the ‘convergence’ and ‘competitiveness and employment’ objectives, on the other, is needed; suggests that regional operational programmes should participate in the cross-border and transnational projects that concern them by earmarking funding by territory for priority projects identified in advance and agreed with their partners in the programmes, in accordance with the principles of multi-level governance and the partnership which will allow better exploitation of the potential of territorial cooperation thanks to the relations developed among private and public actors across borders;
2011/02/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Reminds that a White Paper on territorial cohesion as a follow up to the Green Paper would represent a timely instrument to clarify how to implement territorial cohesion through multi-level governance in the future regional policy and feed in the debate on the next legislative package.
2011/02/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that EGTCs represent a unique, highly valuable territorial governance instrument which meets a need for structured cooperation with reference to financing, the legal status of projects and multi-level governance; Recalls that the instrument of EGTC must be promoted as a tool to set up of systems of cross-border governance, ensuring the ownership of the different policies at regional and local level.
2011/02/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Calls on the Member States to simplify their national provisions, which very often add up administrative burden not required by the Community rules.
2011/02/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Deplores the low profile of territorial cooperation, in the eyes of both national and local authorities and the general public; asks the Commission to promote exchange of information between the EGTCs already created and those in the process of being set up and to come up with ways to raise the profile of EGTCs with territorial cooperation stakeholders and the general public;
2011/02/22
Committee: REGI