3 Amendments of Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN related to 2014/2228(INI)
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph b a (new)
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph b a (new)
ba. when there is an attempt to harmonize or interpret environmental, consumer protection, and work and social legislation between the EU and the US legislations, the binding principle should be to apply legislation that provides higher level of protection;
Amendment 113 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph i a (new)
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph i a (new)
ia. sees that investment arbitration is best channelled via a separate international court where only the states can file a claim. An investor can seek to resolve their disputes with host states through domestic courts but only in those cases where there is clear evidence that the sole purpose of a host country's action is to harm, prohibit or confiscate the investor's property;
Amendment 121 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is concerned that the TTIP negotiations have already affected Commission proposals and actions relating, for example, to food safety and climate protection (e.g. pathogen meat treatments; implementation of the fuel quality directive, labelling of meat from cloned animals and their offspring);