6 Amendments of Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN related to 2021/0367(COD)
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation lays down measures to protect the environment and human health and enhancing circular economy by preventing or reducing the adverse impacts which may result from the shipment of waste. It establishes procedures and control regimes for the shipment of waste, depending on the origin, destination and route of the shipment, the type of waste shipped and the type of treatment to be applied to the waste at its destination.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 10 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 10 – introductory part
10. The Commission shall, at the latest by [OP: Please insert date of twoone years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], assess the feasibility of establishing a harmonised calculation method for determining the amount of financial guarantees or equivalent insurances and, if appropriate, adopt an implementing act to establish such a harmonised calculation method. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 77(2).
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 10
Article 14 – paragraph 10
10. A pre-consent of a recovery facility may be revoked at any time by the competent authority. A decision to revoke a pre-consent shall be duly motivated and communicated to the facility concerned. A pre-consent of a recovery facility may be revoked by the competent authority after prior consultation with the person concerned (operator of the recovery facility) if: a) The information that led to a pre- consent is subsequently found to be incorrect or has changed; b) The facility has violated the conditions for prior consent set out in Article 14(6); c) The facility has been convicted of illegal activities; d) The facility poses a serious risk to the environment and human health for other reasons. The operator has 30 days to object to the revocation.
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. Any notification, information, documentation or other communication submitted pursuant to the provisions of this Title shall be provided in a language acceptable to the competent authorities concerned. English language shall always be accepted by competent authorities concerned.
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
If the competent authorities of dispatch and of destination cannot agree on the classification as regards the distinction between waste and non-waste, the object or substance shall be treated as if it were waste for the purpose of the shipment. However, in the absence of harmonized end-of-waste criteria under Union legislation, where objects or substances meet national end-of-waste criteria in the country of dispatch or of destination in accordance with Article 6(3) of Directive 2008/98/EC, or meet the criteria on a case-by-case basis in the country of dispatch or of destination in accordance with Article 6(4) of Directive 2008/98/EC, the classification as end-of-waste shall prevail. This classification shall also prevail for authorities in the country of transit. This shall be without prejudice to the right of the country of destination to deal with the shipped material in accordance with its national legislation, following arrival of the shipped material and where such legislation is in accordance with Union or international law.