26 Amendments of Frédérique RIES related to 2014/2228(INI)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the TTIP is above all about trade, investment and regulation10 , about reducing or eliminating non-tariff barriers11 , and as such about the level of protection of human health and the environment; __________________ 10See speech by EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström of 11 December 2014.http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/ 2014/december/tradoc_152942.pdf 11 See 2014 Report on Technical Barriers to Trade by the US Trade Representative, p. 45.
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas an ambitious agreement with the US mayshould support the reindustrialisation of Europe and help achieve the 2020 target for an increase of the EU’s GDP generated by industry from 15 % to 20 %; whereas it has the potential to create opportunities especially for SMEs, which suffer more from non-tariff barriers (NTBs) than larger companies; whereas an agreement between the two biggest economic blocs in the world has the potential to create standards, norms and rules which will be adopted at a global level, which would serve to the advantage of third countries as well and should make it possible to avoid a fragmentation of world trade;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 99 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers it misleading on the partthe Commission shall strengthen its explanation and awareness work to citizens on the objective reasons why such negotiations ofn the Commissiontransatlantic partnership are needed to try to appease public concerns about the TTIP by stating that existing standards will not be lowered, as this disregards the fact that many standards have yet to be set in the implementation of existing (framework) legislation (e.g. REACH) or by the adoption of new laws (e.g. cloning);. Insists also on the fact that the European Union shall maintain the same level of protection on public health, food safety and the environment.
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas a diverse energy supply is essential for the European Union and TTIP could be an engine for the development of a strategic transatlantic energy partnership.
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the wellbeing of ordinary citizens, workers and consumers has to be the benchmark for a trade agreement; whereas TTIP should be a model for a good trade agreement respondTTIP should be a model for a good trade agreement responding to multiple requirements and in particular facilitating the activities of producers of goods and services and of exporters and importers while meeting social and environmental objectives for the wellbeing tof these requirements; populations concerned;`
Amendment 169 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Agrees with Commissioner Malmström that allthe most sensitive areas where the EU and the US have very different rules or approaches should be excluded from the negotiations12 such as the EU's integrated approach to food safety, all the legislative package on chemicals products and legislations on extraction, transportation or use of fossil fuels; __________________ 12See speech by EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström of 11 December 2014.
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas President Juncker has clearly reiterated in his Political Guidelines that – while the EU and the US can go a significant step further in recognising each other’s product standards and working towards transatlantic standards – the EU will not sacrifice its safety, health, social, food, environmental and data protection standards or our cultural diversity, recalling that the safety of the food we eat and the protection of Europeans’ personal data are non- negotiable;
Amendment 185 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas his declarations have already been extended into the undertaking given by the European Trade Commissioner, Cecilia Malmström, and the American commerce representative, Michael Froman, on 20 March in Brussels, for the protection of public services in the commercial agreements negotiated by the EU and the United States;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas the method for settling conflicts between investors and States must without fail be accessible, guarantee impartial treatment of the dispute, and include a possibility of appeal against the decision given in the lower court;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I b (new)
Recital I b (new)
Ib. whereas it is necessary to ensure that the investors cannot dispute, whatever the judicial mechanism, decisions of a general nature taken by the Member States relating to public service;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas, also, the salutary efforts of the Commission to persuade the American partner of the justification for increased openness in the negotiations, and the need to continue this proactive approach;
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new)
(iva) to ensure that the fields coming within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Member States as universal services (for example in the fields of education, health and social security) are excluded from the negotiation mandate;
Amendment 293 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Is deeply concerned about the lack ofWelcomes the huge and recent progress made by the Commission in order to ensure transparency in the negotiations, and urges the Commission to give all Members of the European Parliament access to the negotiation texts, in particular the consolidated onescounterpart US negotiators to do the same.
Amendment 304 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Urges the Commission to work with their U.S. counterparts on compatible traceability provisions to ensure that processed and unprocessed foods containing products of animal origin can be effectively traced throughout the entire food chain.
Amendment 394 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vi
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vi
(vi) to ensure an adequate carve-out of sensitive services such as public services and public utilities (including water, health, social security systems and education) allowing national and local authorities enough room for manoeuvre to legislate in the public interest; as joint declearation reflecting negotiators’ clear commitment to exclude these sectors from the negotiations would be very helpful in this regardly expressed by the negotiators in their joint declaration on the exclusion of public services from the scope of TTIP;
Amendment 429 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vii
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vii
(vii) to combine market access negotiations on financial services with convergence in financial regulation on the highest level, in order to support the introduction of necessary regulation in order to preventinforce financial crises and in order tostability and support ongoing cooperation efforts in other international forums, such as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision;
Amendment 460 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point ix
Paragraph 1 – point b – point ix
(ix) to ensure that European competition law is properly respected particularly in the digital world; to ensure that, in the margins of the TTIP negotiations, the European Commission makes additional efforts to develop an ambitious European digital policy.
Amendment 471 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point x
Paragraph 1 – point b – point x
(x) to keep in mind that the agreement should not risk prejudicing the Union’s cultural and linguistic diversity, including in the audiovisual, publishing and cultural services sectors, and that existing and future provisions and policies in support of the cultural sector, in particular in the digital world, are kept out of the scope of the negotiations;
Amendment 488 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xi
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xi
(xi) to ensure that account is taken of the discrepancies in the openness of public procurement markets on both sides of the Atlantic and the huge interest on the part of European companies in obtaining access to public contracts in the US both at federal and state level, for example for construction services, traffic infrastructure and goods and services, civil engineering, airports, urban transport and energy infrastructure, while respecting sustainability criteria for procurement on both sides, inter alia the new EU procurement and concession package entering into force in 2016
Amendment 498 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xi a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xi a (new)
(xia) to ensure that the US increases the transparency of the adjudication process in force on its territory by establishing a single portal for the publication of invitations to tender so as to provide better visibility of public procurement contracts to foreign bidders;
Amendment 608 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iv a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iv a (new)
(iva) to ensure that decisions taken by the regulatory cooperation organisation responsible for establishing future common standards cannot deprive European Member States of the right to establish higher standards;
Amendment 683 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point vii
Paragraph 1 – point d – point vii
(vii) to ensure that in course of the negotiations the two sides examfined ways to facilitate natural gas and oil exports, so that TTIP would abolish any existing export restrictions on energy between the two trading partners, thereby supporting a diversification of energy sources; to ensure that the opening up of the energy market is supported by a strategic transatlantic energy partnership aiming to assure energy security for the EU.
Amendment 779 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv a (new)
(xiva) ensure that negotiations on TTIP include a medium-term aim of establishing a permanent independent international court with jurisdiction to resolve disputes related to international investments;
Amendment 790 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xv
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xv
(xv) to ensure that TTIP includes an ambitious Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) chapter that includes strong protection of precisely and clearly defined areas of IPR, including enhancedfull protection and recognition of European Geographical Indications (GIs), and reflects a fair and efficient level of protection such as laid out in the EU’s and the US’s free trade agreement provis (Protected Designations of Origin and Protected Indications of Origin) favouring the export of such products; to ensure in addition that TTIP reflects a fair and efficient level of protections in thise area of IPR, while continuing to confirm the existing flexibilities in the Agreement on Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), notably in the area of public health;;