5 Amendments of Elisabeth JEGGLE related to 2013/2097(INI)
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas existing framework conditions mean that dairy products can often not be processed close to where they are produced; notes the need to take infrastructure into account and to allow specific designations such as ‘Mountain produce’ to be used for products which are processed within a certain distance of the mountain area concerned; considers it essential for this to be applied to all products made from milk from mountain areas;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas in many disadvantaged areas, milk production ensures economic and social cohesion, and this must not be put at risk by the expiry of quotas, and whereas preservation of the agricultural landscape, the tourism industry, local production-processing-marketing circuits, jobs and long-term perspectives for young people must be safeguarded and promoted;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers it essential for a grazing stock premium to be earmarked for these areas under the first pillar of the CAP; rejects any new requirements regarding the feeding of ruminants which might lead to breakdowns in existing agricultural practice;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the expiry of the milk quota in mountain areas must be evaluated separately as a result of the particular characteristics of such areas if targeted measures to support and maintain production are to be formulated;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that there are serious cost disadvantages associated with milk production in mountain areas as a result of the locations involved and that farmers must, given the additional constraints and, in particular, restrictions on use, be guaranteed economically-viable, profitable work once quotas have expired;