4 Amendments of Hans-Peter MAYER related to 2010/2021(INI)
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Believes, however, that the vast majority of situations requiring the speedy adoption of delegated acts could be dealt with by a flexible procedure for early non-objection which would provide that the period for expressing an objection may be shortened by Parliament and the Council, following a request by the Commission in duly justified cases;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Urges the Commission to present as a matter of priority the legislative proposals needed to adapt the acquis to the provisions of Articles 290 and 291 TFEU; considers, in respect of Article 290 TFEU, that this alignment should not be limited to those measures previously dealt with under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny but should cover all appropriate measures of general scope independently of the decision-making procedure or comitology procedure applicable to them prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon; insists that the first priority must be to adapt the acquis in policy areas which, prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, were not subject to the codecision procedure; calls for them to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis to ensure that, in particular, all appropriate measures of general scope which were previously adopted under Articles 4 and 5 of Decision 1999/468/EC are defined as delegated acts;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
(17a) Stresses, as a fundamental principle, that the final decision as to whether an act is a delegated act or an implementing act should be taken by Parliament and the Council alone when adopting the basic act; calls on the Commission, therefore, to conduct informal talks with the relevant European Parliament committees before drawing up legislative proposals relating to the adaptation of the acquis;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to present as a matter of urgency aNotes the legislative proposal based on Article 291(3) TFEU setting out the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers; stresses that Parliament should retain aits right of information concerning implementing acts, inasmuch as this would enable it to control their legality and its right to control their legality; stresses that Parliament and the Council, as coequal legislators, should have equal access to all information relating to implementing acts;