BETA

Activities of Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS related to 2011/0438(COD)

Plenary speeches (1)

Award of concession contracts - Public procurement - Procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0438(COD)

Amendments (18)

Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) The award of public contracts by or on behalf of Member States authorities has to comply with the principles of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services as well as the principles deriving therefrom, such as equal treatment, non-discrimination, mutual recognition, proportionality and, transparency and publicity. However, for public contracts above a certain value, provisions should be drawn up coordinating national procurement procedures so as to ensure that these principles are given practical effect and public procurement is opened up to competition.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
(41) Furthermore, in technical specifications and in award criteria, contracting authorities should be allowed to refer to a specific production process, a specific mode of provision of services, or a specific process for any other stage of the life cycle of a product or service, provided that they are directly linked to the subject- matter of the public contract. In order to better integrate social considerations in public procurement, procurers may also be allowed to include, in the award criterion of the most economically advantageous tender, characteristics related to the working conditions of the persons directly participating in the process of production or provision in question. Those characteristics may only concern the protection of health of the staff involved in the production process or the favouring of social integration of disadvantaged persons or members of vulnerable groups amongst the persons assigned to performing the contract, including accessibility for persons with disabilities. Any award criteria which include those characteristics should in any event remain limited to characteristics that have immediate consequences on staff members in their working environment. They should be applied in accordance with Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and in a way that does not discriminate directly or indirectly against economic operators from other Member States or from third countries parties to the Agreement or to Free Trade Agreements to which the Union is party. For service contracts and for contracts involving the design of works, contracting authorities should also be allowed to use as an award criterion the organisation, qualification and experience of the staff assigned to performing the contract in question, as this may affect the quality of contract performance and, as a result, the economic value of the tender.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) Contract performance conditions are compatible with this Directive provided that they are not directly or indirectly discriminatory, are directly linked to the subject- matter of the contract and are indicated in the contract notice, the prior information notice used as a means of calling for competition or the procurement documents. They may, in particular, be intended to favour on-site vocational training, the employment of people experiencing particular difficulty in achieving integration, the fight against unemployment, protection of the environment or animal welfare. For instance, mention may be made, amongst other things, of the requirements — applicable during performance of the contract — to recruit long-term job-seekers or to implement training measures for the unemployed or young persons, to comply in substance with fundamental International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conventions, even where such Conventions have not been implemented in national law, and to recruit more disadvantaged persons than are required under national legislation.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Contracting authorities shall treat economic operators equally and without discrimination and shall act in a transparent and proportionate way, ensuring the most efficient use of public funds.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Member States may make mandatory the use of electronic means of communication in other situations than those provided for in Articles 32, 33, 34, 35(2), 49(2) or 51 of this Directive, provided that they do not represent an insurmountable obstacle for SMEs and microenterprises.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 22
Candidates shall be required at the beginning of the procedure to provide a declaration on honour that they have not undertaken and will not undertake to: (a) unduly influence the decision-making process of the contracting authority or obtain confidential information that may confer upon them undue advantages in the procurement procedure; (b) enter into agreements with other candidates and tenderers aimed at distorting competition; (c) deliberately provide misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award.Article 22 deleted Illicit conduct
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Member States shall ensure that the non compliance of the obligation of neutrality by contracting authorities is punished with a sanction.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the requirements for the label only concern characteristics which are directly linked to the subject-matter of the contract and are appropriate to define characteristics of the works, supplies or services that are the subject-matter of the contract;
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) where it is aware of anycan prove a violation of obligations established by Union legislation in the field of social and labour law or environmental law or of the international social and environmental law provisions listed in Annex XI. Compliance with Union legislation or with international provisions also includes compliance in an equivalent manner.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) where the economic operator is from a third country that fails to open its own public procurement markets to the EU's companies;
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) where the contracting authority can demonstrate by any meanshow evidence which proves that the economic operator is guilty of other grave professional misconduct;
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Contracting authorities shall limit any conditions for participation to those that are appropriate to ensure that a candidate or tenderer has the legal and financial capacities and the commercial and technical abilities to perform the contract to be awarded. All requirements shall be directly related and strictly proportionate to the subject-matter of the contract, taking into account the need to ensure genuine competition.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 62 – paragraph 2
2. In the case of works contracts, service contracts and siting and installation operations in the context of a supply contract, contracting authorities may require that certain critical tasks be performed directly by the tenderer itself or, where a tender is submitted by a group of economic operators as referred to in Article 6, a participant in the group.deleted
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 66 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The most economically advantageous tender referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 from the point of view of the contracting authority shall be identified on the basis of criteria directly linked to the subject-matter of the public contract in question. Those criteria shall include, in addition to the price or costs referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1, other criteria directly linked to the subject-matter of the public contract in question, such as:
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 69 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) at least five tenders have been submitdeleted.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 69 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
(ea) Other aspects which sufficiently explain the abnormally low cost of the tender.
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 72 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the modification changes the economic balance of the contract in favour of the contractor;deleted
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 73 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the Court of Justice of the European Union finds, in a procedure pursuant to Article 258 of the Treaty, that a Member State has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaties due to the fact that a contracting authority belonging to that Member State has awarded the contract in question without complying with its obligations under the Treaties and this Directive.deleted
2012/06/13
Committee: ITRE