BETA

7 Amendments of Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS related to 2013/0340(NLE)

Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 33 a (new)
(33a) Considering the risks of duplication with existing international peer review processes and the risk of interference in the work of independent national regulatory authorities, topical peer reviews should build on the experience gained by ENSREG and WENRA during the European safety reassessments after Fukushima. ENSREG and WENRA should be entrusted by Member States with the choice of topics, the organisation of the topical peer review, its implementation, and follow-up actions.
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2009/71/EURATOM
Article 5–paragraph 2 – point e
(e) employs an appropriate number of staff with, all of whom, in particular politically appointed board members, possess the necessary qualifications, experience and expertise;
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8a – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires that nuclear installations arbe designed, sited, constructed, commissioned, operated and decommissioned with the objective of avoiding potential radioactive releasespreventing accidents and, should an accident occur, mitigating its effects and avoiding large, long term, off-site contamination by:
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive 71/2009/Euratom
Article 8 a – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires that the objectives set out in paragraph 1 applies toy to new reactors and shall be considered as a target for existing nuclear installations to the extent reasonably achievable.
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 71/2009/Euratom
Article 8e– paragraph 2 – point a
(a) jointly and in close coordination with the Commission select one or more specific topics related to the nuclear safety of nuclear installations. Should Member States fail to jointly select at least a topic within the time frame specified in this paragraph, the Commission shall select the topics to be the subject of the peer reviews;
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) based on these topicsassess to what extent these topics have been addressed and, if need be, perform in close collaboration with licence holders, national assessments of their installations, to be evaluated by the competent regulatory authority, and publish the results;
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) jointly define a methodology, arrange and carry out a peer review of the results of the national assessments referred to in point (b), to which the Commission is invited to participate as an observer;
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE