10 Amendments of Christine DE VEYRAC related to 2011/0398(COD)
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) Use of noise abatement operational procedures must not take precedence over the need to ensure flight safety. The competent authorities should therefore ensure that operational restriction measures do not impair the upholding of appropriate safety measures.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules on the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions in a consistent manner on an airport-by-airport basis so as to help improve the noise climate and to limit or reduce the number of people significantly affected by the harmful effects of aircraft noise, in accordance with the Balanced Approach.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
This Regulation shall apply to movements of aircraft engaged in civil aviation.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
It shall not apply to movements of aircraft engaged in military, customs, police, or similar services.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The Member States shall notify the Commission of the names and addresses of the designated competent authorities and appeal body referred to in paragraph 1. The Commission shall be instructed to make this information public.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) not as a first resort, operating restrictionsoperating restrictions, only after considering the beneficial effect in terms of noise abatement of points (a), (b) and (c) of this article.
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Where the operating restriction concerns the withdrawal of marginally compliant aircraft from an airport, no new services shall be allowed with marginally compliant aircraft at that airport six months after the notification. The competent authorities shall decide on the annual rate for removing marginally compliant aircraft from the fleet of affected operators at that airport, taking due account of the age of the aircraft and the composition of the total fleet. Without prejudice to paragraph 3 of Article 4, this rate shall not be more than 20% of that operator’s fleet ofat that airport. This annual rate may not exceed 20% of movements and must apply uniformly to every operator concerned on the basis of the number of movements of its marginally compliant aircraft serving thatat a given airport.
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) aircraft on humanitarian flights.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10
Article 10
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.4
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.4
Forecast noise contours – including an assessment of the number of people likely to be affected by aircraft noise – distinguish between established residential areas and, newly constructed residential areas. and planned future residential areas that have already been granted authorisation by the competent authorities.