5 Amendments of Gianni VATTIMO related to 2013/0812(COD)
Amendment 7 #
Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the budgetary authorities to ensure that the additional costs relating to the change in the seat of CEPOL will be fully covered by the United Kingdom and will not to jeopardise the normal operational needs of CEPOL.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation
-
-
The European Parliament rejects the proposal.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) By letters of 12 December 2012 and 8 February 2013, the United Kingdom informed CEPOLIn violation of its legal obligations and commitments pursuant to both Council Decision 2005/681/JHA and the Headquarters Agreement concluded between the United Kingdom and CEPOL on 30 December 2004, by letters of 12 December 2012 and 8 February 2013, the United Kingdom informed CEPOL – instead of informing the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission - that it had unilaterally decided that it no longer wishesd to host the seat on its territory. Apart from hosting CEPOL, Bramshill also hosts a national police training site of the National Policing Improvement Agency which the United Kingdom decided to replace by a new College of Policing to be located elsewhere. The United Kingdom has therefore decided to close the national police training site at Bramshill and to sell the site indicating that the related costs were high and no alternative business model to run the site had emerged. The UK government did not provide reasons to justify why it could not relocate CEPOL somewhere else on the UK territory, instead of expelling it "de facto".
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 f (new)
Recital 3 f (new)
(3f) The European Parliament in its resolution of 3 July 2013 on the situation of fundamental rights: standards and practices in Hungary (pursuant to the European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012), has expressed a series of serious concerns on the situation in Hungary and issued a series of detailed recommendations to the Hungarian authorities on the fundamental law, on checks and balances, on the independence of the judiciary, on the electoral reform, on media and pluralism, on the respect for fundamental rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities, on freedom of religion or belief and recognition of churches. The resolution calls on the Hungarian authorities to inform Parliament, the Commission, the Presidencies of the Council and of the European Council, and the Council of Europe regarding implementation of such recommendations. In the absence of such information by the Hungarian authorities and of an evaluation by institutions involved on whether the Hungarian authorities have effectively followed up the EP and EU recommendations, it is not possible to decide for a relocation of CEPOL to Hungary, notably in consideration of the extremely short timeframe imposed by the Council for the adoption of the Regulation. For these reasons, an alternative relocation solution has to be found, or alternatively more time should be granted so to allow for such information to be provided, make an evaluation and take a decision;
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Council Decision 2005/681/JHA
Article 4
Article 4
The seat of CEPOL shall be in Budapest, Hungarythe United Kingdom.