BETA

Activities of Amalia SARTORI related to 2011/2043(INI)

Plenary speeches (1)

Seventh EU programme for research, technological development and demonstration (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2043(INI)

Amendments (16)

Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission communication of 6 October 2010 on the flagship initiative 'Innovation Union' and to the relevant objectives,
2011/03/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the Innovation Union will be the strategic reference framework for research activities and funding programmes starting from 2011,
2011/03/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Proposes that research be accelerated in the sectors identified in the ‘Cooperation’ chapter of FP7: health, medicine, food, biotechnology, ICT, nanosciences and nanotechnologies, materials, pollution, energy (with particular reference to the SET-PLAN initiative), environment (includingand climate change, woods and forests), ecotechnologies, CO2 capture, transport, socio-economic sciences and humanities, space, cultural goods, space and security; water research should also be a priority;
2011/03/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes, in the ‘Ideas’ chapter, promising results obtained by the European Research Council (ERC) and its role aimed at enhancing the visibility and attractivenesson capacity of European research bodies; stresses the need to make the ERC an independent legal entity with decision- making power, directly responsible for its own scientific strategyexpects, therefore, the confirmation of the existing legal status of the ERC, in a context of full transparency in terms of procedures and administrative management;
2011/03/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Expresses reservations regarding more systematic use of overly open calls for proposals (bottom-up approach), preferring to maintain a balance between the two approaches (bottom-up and top-down), which meet specific needs, taking care to present proposals which are more easily accessible for SMEs;
2011/03/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to carry out an analysis to improve the link between European and national actions; asks that calls for proposals, including those of July 2011, be issued in consultation with the Member States, not duplicating or competing with national initiatives but complementing them; suggests that FP7 should complement the efforts of actors managing national programmes involved in joint programming in order to move the RDFPs away from project management thinking towards programme management thinking; asks that the last three years of FP7 be devoted to helping structure the European Research Area and pursuing the objectives of the Innovation Union, paying particular attention to the priorities identified with the innovation partnerships;
2011/03/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Highlights the importance of the Capacities programme for SMEs, insofar as it improves access for small businesses; hopes, therefore, that the number of annual calls for proposals under the programme will be increased, and that that number will be further increased under forthcoming EU programmes;
2011/03/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Maintains that SME clustering and cooperation between networks of SMEs, universities and public research institutes should be facilitated in order further to promote the participation of small-, medium-sized and micro-enterprises;
2011/03/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls for recognition at regional level of the important role played by intermediary organisations (such as chambers of commerce, the Enterprise Europe Network and regional innovation agencies) as a link between innovative SMEs in each region and the Commission;
2011/03/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Recommends that the current instruments be adjusted to fit the specific mechanisms of innovation, with its time constraints and requirements for placing on the market;
2011/03/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Proposes that the concept demonstration phase be funded in future calls for projects under FP7 in the field of innovation ;
2011/03/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Reiterates that innovation must be understood to cover both products and processes and the organisation of services;
2011/03/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Is of the opinion that the key players in the value chain should be considered in future calls for projects under FP7 in the field of innovation;
2011/03/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Reiterates the importance of introducing, without delay, procedural, administrative and financial simplification measures into current management of FP7, such as those identified in Parliament’s resolution of 11 November 2010, particularly with a view to promoting participation by SMEs; calls on the Commission to make proposals on these simplification measures in the context of the current FP7 to complement its initial proposals; reiterates its wish to see current legal proceedings between the Commission and beneficiaries across all of the framework programmes settled quickly, while respecting the principle of responsible management of public money;
2011/03/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Expresses concern, however, in the light of the derisory sums allocated to research infrastructures, universities and research bodies and SMEs, in particular innovative SMEs, and also given the acknowledged geographical and sectoral imbalance in loans allocated; supports, therefore, the specific recommendations made by the expert group aimed at improving participation of certain under- represented target groups, and endorses the European Council’s conclusions of 4 February 2011, especially its call for all possible options to be explored with a view to the valorisation of intellectual property rights at the European level, in particular to ease SMEs’ access to the knowledge market;
2011/03/24
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 303 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Believes that the remaining sums should not be diverted from research and used for other programmes or instruments that do not come within the research and innovation sector or the objectives and scope of FP7;
2011/03/24
Committee: ITRE