BETA

3 Amendments of Gianni PITTELLA related to 2010/0207(COD)

Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) In order to prevent future unnecessary calls on a DGS, there should be a stronger focus on preventive action. In particular, the supervision should be enhanced and supervisors should conduct proper assessment of business models, of new and existing players, eventually resulting in mandatory changes, limitations in activities, or even exclusion.
2011/04/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The available financial means shall at least reach the target level. Where the financing capacity falls short of the target level, the payment of contributions shall resume at least until the target level is reached again. Where. The regular contribution must not be less than 0.1% of the deposits covered as long as the target level has not been reached. Where, after the target level has been reached on the first occasion, the available financial means amount to less than two thirds of the target level because of the use of funds, the regular contribution shall not be less than 0.25% of eligible deposits.deposits covered
2011/04/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The contributions to Deposit Guarantee Schemes referred to in Article 9 shall be determined for each member on the basis of the degree of risk incurred by it. Credit institutions shall not pay less than 75% or more than 2300% of the amount that a bank with an average risk would have to contribute. Member States may decide that members of Schemes referred to in Article 1(3) and (4) pay lower contributions to Deposit Guarantee Schemes but not less than 37.5% of the amount that a bank with an average risk would have to contribute.
2011/04/05
Committee: ECON