3 Amendments of Anne E. JENSEN related to 2008/2103(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers, therefore, the Commission's decision to withdraw its proposal for this IIA a pragmatic step that might at the same time create an opportunity to search for other solutions which need to be found as a matter of urgency; is convinced that, for the sake of transparency, some kind of a horizontal framework is necessary for the agencies, despite their differencesvariation in character;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Would like to reflect on someInsists on the need to establish minimum common standards with regard, amongst other things, to the role and political responsibility of the Commission in relation to the agency, the support to be granted by host countries orand the timely and transparent decision on the seat of an agency which could be referred to in the agencies' founding regulations;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Considers it, in addition, of the highest importance to try to define some common rules for the presentation of the agencies' budgets with the aim of making budgetary indicators, such as implementation rates of the agencies or the individual shares making up their revenue and expenditure, more transparent and comparable; would also like to reflect, in this respect, onbelieves that the general current presentation of the subsidy to agencies in the EU budget, given the fact that this presentation might need to be adapted to tasks and roles of the new generation of agencies.