Activities of Anne E. JENSEN related to 2010/2002(BUD)
Plenary speeches (1)
Mandate for the trilogue on the 2011 Draft Budget (debate)
Amendments (9)
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4a new
Paragraph 4a new
4a. Furthermore, stresses that the margin in heading 2, might actually be lower as market conditions may change;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls, in that respect, that a proposal for substantial budget review is awaited, and that the difficulties encoUnderlines that when the current Multiannual Financial Framework was adopted in 2006: - the economic and financial crisis that the EU has untdered in the previous budgetary procedures to react properly and satisfactorily to various challenges that have arisegone since 2008 and its consequences were not foreseen; - the Lisbon Treaty was not in force; - specific needs linked to a number of new programmes and procedures (implementation of the Lisbon Trender the revision of the current MFF unavoidableaty, new financial supervision authorities, GMES, Stockholm programme, etc.) didn't exist;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Points out the important number of outstanding procedures involving far reaching budgetary consequences that have to be concluded by the two branches of the budgetary authority in 2011 (budget reviStresses that, under these conditions, a profound review of the EU budget must be considered rapidly, as regards resources as well as budget appropriations, in order to adapt it to a completely new, setting up of the European External Action Service (EEAS), Amending Budgets, revision of the IIA, revision of the Financial Regulation etc.)ituation and to meet the EU citizens' expectations; recalls that the adaptation capacities of the EU budget within the framework of the Multiannual Financial Framework have reached their limit;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. While acknowledging the efforts made for the presentation of administrative expenditure outside Heading 5, calls for further clarification in the allocation between operational and administrative expenditure; notes that an already substantial amount of what is, in reality, administrative expenditure, for instance that of EU agencies, is financed from operational allocations;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses that the budgetary resources made available in the future for instruments such as the Lifelong Learning programme and cross-cutting skills, such as e-skills, international skills, entrepreneurial skills and multilingualism, reflect thehigh European added value they deliverand hence should be given priority in the 2011 budget;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a new
Paragraph 20 a new
20a. Welcomes the effort that has been made on TEN-Ts but, as regards the budget for transport, which is strategic for the European economy and social life, expresses concern about the constraints and lack of margin that weighs upon all remaining transport policies;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b new
Paragraph 20 b new
20b. Is disappointed that tourism, which indirectly generates more than 10% of the EU's GDP and which has become a full competence of the EU with the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, is not clearly identified in the 2011 DB;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c new
Paragraph 20 c new
20c. Insists that new resources generated by transport should be specifically allocated to transport; stresses that Cohesion and Regional Funds should be linked to TEN-T projects;