6 Amendments of Anne E. JENSEN related to 2010/2004(BUD)
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that the EU was able to react collectively to the financial and economic crisis by adopting an ambitious European Economic Recovery Plan (EERP), but notes that the overall economic situation in the EU is still deteriorating and is far from satisfactory in comparison to the world’s other leading economies;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a new
Paragraph 14 a new
14 a. Stresses that transport is an essential element of the European economy, enabling the mobility of persons, goods and knowledge across borders; underlines that transport is a vector of equality and social mobility, for young people in particular, since it opens up opportunities and improves exchanges in the field of knowledge and training;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a new
Paragraph 26 a new
26a. Recalls that, in the context of Europe's economic recovery, investment in transport particularly via investment in the TEN-Ts, has a crucial role to play in driving forward growth and employment as well as in advancing Europe's economic and environmental interests;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a new
Paragraph 27 a new
27a. Supports the prolongation of the financing of the decommissioning of the Kozluduy power plant, for 2010-2013; recalls that this prolongation was not foreseen in the current MFF and that, consequently, further financing of the decommissioning of the Kozluduy power plant deserves an appropriate multiannual funding solution, without prejudice to the financing of existing multi-annual programmes and actions;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b new
Paragraph 27 b new
27b. Recalls that, with the Lisbon Treaty, the EU now has a space policy; underlines the need to assure sufficient financing to fulfil the ambitions of this policy;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Is therefore extremely worried by the sharp decrease in appropriations foreseen in the MFF, amounting to a huge drop of EUR 1875 billion compared with the 2010 budget; understands that the financing of the EERP partially explains this situation, but remains absolutely convinced that an ambitious, consistent revision of themid-term review of the current MFF is a sine qua non condition for an effective EU budget;