BETA

5 Amendments of Anne E. JENSEN related to 2012/2276(BUD)

Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the EGF is an obvious example of the European added value, deeply regrets that some Member States are simultaneously presenting applications to mobilise the fund, proposing the reduction of the appropriations for the Fund, and opposing its continuation within the new MFF;deleted
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the key importance of adapted training and recognition of skills and competences gained throughout the professional career; underlines that it is essential that the training on offer in the coordinated package is to be adapted and adequate to the needs and level of the dismissed workers, taking into account their social and economic background current business environment;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated in the new Regulation on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014–2020) and thatwith these improvements greater efficiency, facilitated mobilization, transparency and visibility of the EGF will be achieved;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Acknowledges that following requests from Parliament, the 2012 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 50 000 000 on the EGF budget line 04 05 01; deeply regretnotes, however, that for the second year in a row these payment appropriations have turned out to be clearly insufficient to cover the funding requests for a whole year and the missing payment appropriations have to be marshaled though an amending budget via transfers from other budget lines; believes that both these facts do not denote sound budgeting; recalls that the EGF was created as a specific instrument to give an immediate and adequate answer to special situations of social emergencies raised by the impact ofresponse to mass redundancies due to the direct and indirect effects of globalization; highlights, therefore, that the EGF deserves a dedicated andwithout adequate level of appropriations, and in order to avoid systematic transfers from other budget lines, as has happened in the past, which is detrimental toneither the emergency nature of the EGF itselfnor its integrity can be guaranteed;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Regrets the decision of the Council to block the extension of the "crisis derogation", allowing to provide financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current financial and economic crisis in addition to those losing their job because of changes in global trade patterns, and allowing the increase in the rate of Union co-financing to 65% of the programme costs, for applications submitted after the 31 December 2011 deadline, and calls on the Council to reintroduce this measure without delay;deleted
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG