BETA

7 Amendments of Anne E. JENSEN related to 2013/2087(BUD)

Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Deeply regretNotes that the Commission did not analyse the effectiveness of the use of the crisis derogation criterion until now, specially taking into account that these EGF cases were not evaluated in the EGF mid-term review; notes that the Commission is entering the final phase of the ex-post evaluation of the EGF (2007- 2013); regrets, however, that the results are likely to arrive too late to feed into the discussion on the new regulation for the EGF in 2014-2020, especially regarding the effectiveness of the use of the crisis derogation criterion.
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls the importance of networking and exchange of information on the EGF; supports, therefore the funding of the Expert Group of Contact Persons of the EGF as well as other networking activities among the Member States including this years' seminar for practitioners on the implementation of the EGF; underlines the need to further enhance the liaising between all those involved in EGF applications, including namely the social partners, to create as many synergies as possible.
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Notes the fact that following repeated requests from Parliament, and despite the fact that it is still under the necessary level, that the 2013 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 50 000 000 on the EGF budget line 04 05 01; recalls that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines and that it therefore deservehas a dedicated allocation, which would avoid unnecessary delays, due to the fact that now its financing is made through transfers from other budget lines, which have proven to be detrimental to the achievement of the social, economic and policy objectives of the EGF of payment appropriations, which helps avoid unnecessary delays.
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Deeply regrets the decision of the Council to block the extension of the 'crisis derogation' which allows provision of financial assistance to workers made redundant as a result of the current social, financial and economic crisis, in addition to those losing their job because of changes in global trade patterns, and which allows an increase in the rate of Union co-financing to 65% of the programme costs, for applications submitted after the 31 December 2011 deadline; calls on the Council to reintroduce this measure without delay, especially in the context of an aggravation of social emergency situations in several Member States following the expansion and deepening of recession.deleted
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Council to introduce special provisions to facilitate mobilisation of the EGF fund for Member States facing particularly serious social, economic and financial constraints.deleted
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Council and the Commission to promote the extension of the object and criteria of the EGF Regulation, in order to integrate and facilitate applications from countries with a smaller demographic density, namely by setting the threshold to 200 workers, and extending the eligibility criteria to independent works from other sectors.deleted
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Deeply regrets the European Council conclusions of 7-8 February 2013; insists on the need to increase the level of appropriations available for the EGF both in commitments and in payments of the EGF to at least the current annual amount of EUR 500 000 000; furthermore calls on the Council, under the budgetary unity principle, to consider the integration of the EGF in the Union budget.deleted
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG