4 Amendments of Clemente MASTELLA related to 2009/0165(COD)
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) With a view to ensuring substantive equality between female and male applicants, examination procedures should be gsender sensitivesitive to the specificities of the two sexes. In particular, personal interviews should be organised in a way which makes its possible for both female and male applicants to speak about their past experiences in cases involving gender sex-based persecution. The complexity of gender sex-related claims should be properly taken into account in procedures based on the safe third country concept, the safe country of origin concept or the notion of subsequent applications.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) gendersex, trauma and age awareness;
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point d
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) the personnel examining applications and taking decisions are instructed and have the possibility to seek advice, whenever necessary, from experts on particular issues, such as medical, cultural, child or gender, religious or sex issues.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. Paragraph 3 shall not apply to cases where disclosure of particular circumstances of a person to members of his/her family can jeopardize the interests of that person, including cases involving gendersex and/or age based persecution. In such cases, a separate decision shall be issued to the person concerned.