18 Amendments of Geoffrey VAN ORDEN related to 2012/2096(INI)
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas clear and harmonised definitions of ‘cyber security’ and ‘cyber defence’ are lacking at EU and international levels; whereas the understanding of cyber security and other key terminologyies variesy considerably amongbetween different countries;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the EU has not yet developed coherent policies of its own regarding critical information and infrastructure protection is of vital importance to all EU Member States;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the EU has proposed various initiatives to tackle cybercrime, including the establishment of a new Cybercrime Centre; notes that both the establishment and subsequent work-programmes of this centre should be, where possible, budget neutral;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas cyber defence is one of the top priorities of the EDA, which has set up, under the Capabilities Development Plan, a project team on cyber security with the majority of Member States working to collect experiences and propose recommendationshas been part of NATO's agenda for more than a decade, following the adoption of the 'Cyber Defence Programme' at the 2002 Prague Summit; whereas work is also being undertaken under the auspices of other organisations, including the EDA; whereas cyber defence features in the top priorities of the EDA;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas raising awareness and educating citizens on cyber security should constitute the basisbe a part of any comprehensive cyber security strategy;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital R
Recital R
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines therefore the need for a global and coordinated approach to these challenges, at the EU level with the development of a comprehensive EU cyber security strategy which should providend for Member States to work towards agreeing to a common legal definition of cyber security and defence, a common operating vision, and take into account the added value of the existing agencies and bodies; stresses the crucial importance of coordination and creating synergies at the level of the Unionbetween Member States to help combine different initiatives, programmes and activities; emphasises that such a strategy should ensure flexibility and be updated on regular basis to adapt to the rapidly changing nature of cyberspace;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the importance of the efficient development of the EU Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) and CERTs aNotes that a Rapid Reaction Team (RRT) capability of 6 NATO cyber defence experts weill as the development of national contingency plans in the event that action needs to be taken; welcomesbe operational by the end of 2012; notes that given these capabilities, and the fact that, by May 2012, all EU Member States had set up national CERTs; urges the further development of national CERTs and EU CERT capable of being deployed within 24 hoursomputer Emergency Response Teams (CERTs), further clarity ifs needed; stresses the need to look into the feasibility of a public-private partnership in this field to justify the development of parallel EU CERTs;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Underlines the importance for Member States of close cooperation with the EDA on developing their national cyber defence capabilities; believes that building synergies, pooling and sharing at European level are crucial for effective cyber defence at European and national levelat the EDA should undertake any work in this sphere only after close consultation with Member States, to avoid any possible duplication of effort;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Observes with concern that only one Member State achieved the level of 2 % expenditure on defence research and development by 2010, and that five Member States spent nothing on R&D in 2010; urges the EDA, together with Member States, to pool resourcesinvest carefully and to effectively invest in collaborative research and development, with particular regard to cyber security and defence;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Encourages all Member States to create designated cyber security and cyber defence units within their military structure, where these are not already in place;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Urges the Member States to develop national contingency plans and to include cyber crisis management in crisis management plans and risk analysis; further underlines the importance of adequate training on essential cyber security for all staff in public entities; calls on ENISA and other relevant bodies to assist Member States in ensuring the pooling and sharing of resources as well as avoiding duplication;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. Underlines the need to pool and share on a practical level, considering the complementary nature of the EU and NATO approach to cyber security and defence; eEmphasises the need for closerareful coordination, especially concerning planning, technology, training and equipment with regard to cyber security and defence, to avoid any unnecessary duplication of effort in this sphere;