26 Amendments of Geoffrey VAN ORDEN related to 2017/2123(INI)
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that the rules-based international order and the values defended by liberal democracies, and the peace, prosperity and freedoms which this order guarantees and which correspond to the foundations on which our national democracies and the European Union isare built, are facing unprecedented challenges;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is concerned that in a challenging security environment, and at a moment when the EU and NATO are endeavouring to broaden and deepen their cooperation, two key players in the field of security and defence, the US and the UK, arit is essential that we redefmain ing their positions with regard to both organisations close partnership with, the US and the UK; stresses that we stand firmly committed to the transatlantic community of common values and interests;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Emphasises the importance of a continued and close partnership between the UK, EU Member States and the EU;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomNotes the visible progress made in framing a stronger European defence since the adoption of the EU Global Strategy in June 2016; welcomes in particular the suggestion for a European Defence Fund, the proposed scaling-up of the Preparatory Action on Defence Research, and the legislative proposal for a European Defence Industrial Development Programme (EDIDP);
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. WelcomAcknowledges the Commission’s intention to propose a specific programme for defence research, with a dedicated budget and own rules, under the next MFF; underlines that Member States shouldmay choose to make additional resources available to that programme, as requested in Parliament’s resolution of 5 July 2017; renews its previous calls on the Commission to provide for Union participation in defence research and development programmes undertaken by M; recalls the success of collaborative defence industrial programmes between certain member Sstates, or jointly with industry where appropri which have not necessitate,d as referred to in Articles 185 and 187 TFEUny EU involvement;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Recognises the fact that for many decades under NATO and bilaterally and multilaterally member states have very successfully integrated their military formations with those of other Member States, without any EU involvement;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Considers that the proposed DG Defence should have the responsibility for ‘Defence Schengen’ arrangements, for security of supply, standardisation and military certification arrangements, for EU contributions to programmes under the CSDP and PESCO, for EU-funded defence research, and for the interinstitutional arrangements in the defence remit, including the EU White BookRecalling previous NATO procedures, calls for some sort of ‘Defence Schengen’ arrangements, for ease of movement of military traffic in time of crisis and security of supply;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines that the proposed DG Defence should work in liaison with the European Defence Agency (EDA); cConsiders that the EDA should be the implementing agency for Union actions under the European Capabilities and Armaments policy, where this is foreseen by the Lisbon Treaty; renews its call on the Council to ensurseeks assurance that the administrative and operational expenditure of the EDA is funded by its participants as well as from the Union budget;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. WelcomNotes the strategic review of the EU’s Capability Development Plan (CDP) due to be completed in Spring 2018; underlines that the CDP will enable the EDA to foster collaboration among Member States in filling capability gaps;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Thanks the more than six thousand women and men who have given excellent and loyal service in their national armed forces contributing to the Union’s civilian and military missions on three continents; greatly values these missions as Europe’s common contribution to peace and stability in the world and to the security of our citiznents; welcomes the increase in Member States’ defence spending in support of our service members; takes the view that this trend needs to be sustained, and strengthened and coordinthat greatedr at European leveltention be given to the revitalization of NATO capabilities;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. WelcomNotes the presentation of the first annual report on the CSDP by the VP/HR; regretnotes, however, that this report is of quantitative nature only, describing achievements with statistical data and detailed information rather than evaluating the political impact of CSDP activities in improving the security of our citizens;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Considers that as a consequence of the UK’s announcement of withdrawal from the Union, the command option of EUNAVFOR Atalanta needs to be reviewed; considers that the Union’s naval missions in the Mediterranean and the Horn of Africa could be brought under the command of a single naval headquarterspecial emphasis needs to be given to the future defence partnership with the United Kingdom; recognizing that the UK is Europe's foremost military power and that there is advantage to the Union in ensuring that the UK continues to have at least observer status in the EU defence and security decision-making process;
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Reiterates that NATO has primacy in terms of European defence;emphasises the need for EU Member States to meet the minimum NATO targets of 2% GDP to be spent on defence and 20% of that on research and development;
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29