Activities of Andrew DUFF related to 2013/2185(INI)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on relations between the European Parliament and the national parliaments PDF (199 KB) DOC (104 KB)
Amendments (41)
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7
Citation 7
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
Citation 10
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11
Citation 11
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
Citation 15 a (new)
– having regard to Rule 130 of its Rules of Procedure,
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas under the principle of sincere cooperation the Union and national institutionMember States assist each other, in full mutual respect, in carrying out tasks which flow from the Treaties and whereas the latter institutionMember States facilitate the achievement of the Union's tasks and refrain from any measures that could jeopardise the attainment of the Union's objectives;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas Article 12 of the TEU, covering the activities of national parliaments, fleshes out the principle of sincere cooperation by stating that the national parliaments should contribute actively to the good functioning of the Union;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the principle of conferral circumscribdefines the competences of the Union, which are exercised in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, and whereas all EU institutions together with the national parliaments seek to ensure that draft legislative acts comply with the subsidiarity principle;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas democratic legitimacy and accountability must be ensured at theall levels at which decisions are taken andor implemented;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the Union operates on the basis of representative democracy and a two-fold democratic legitimacy stemming from the European Parliament, directly elected by the citizens, and the Member States, as represented in the Council by their governments, which are in turn democratically accountable to their national parliaments and citizens;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas, accordingly, the national parliaments taken together do not form a ‘'third chamber’ in' of the EU’'s constitutional set-uplegislature, but instead serve to makehold to account the Union’'s second chamber, the Council, more democratic;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas the national parliaments’ competence' powers in connection with the subsidiarity principle are viewused by most of those parliaments more as a means of engaging in ‘political dialogue’ with the European institutions than as a formal legal means of blocking legislation;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Q
Recital Q
Q. whereas following the establishment of the Interparliamentary Conference for the CFSP and the CSDP and the Interparliamentary Conference on Economic and Financial Governance, as well as the consolidation of sector specific interparliamentary committee meetings’ position as the preferred channel for cooperation, COSAC should focus on its role of making periodic reviews of the general statremain the forum for a regular exchange of views, information and best practice ofn the integpraction processcal aspects of parliamentary scrutiny;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital R
Recital R
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital S
Recital S
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital T
Recital T
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital U
Recital U
U. whereas, almost five years after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, with a view to future Conventions, relations between the European Parliament and the national parliaments now need to be consolidated and properly organised in order to avoid duplication and to help to give greater democratic legitimacy to the European integration process, as well as to ensure that democratic scrutiny is exercised in a timely manner and at the level at which decisions are taken and implemented and that everyone all parties in the legislative process receive the information they requiretinually developed in the light of new challenges;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) active involvement in EU law-makingaffairs (Treaty ratification powers, participation in Conventions under Article 48 of the TEU, scrutiny of national governments, scrutiny of subsidiarity, ability to oppose legislation under exceptional circumstances, transposition of EU legislation into national law);
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) political dialogue (multitier interparliamentary cooperation, mutual exchange of information with European institutions, in particular the European Parliament);
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Points out the two-fold legitimacy of the Union, as a union of peoples and of states, is embodied, in the EU legislative process, by the European Parliament and the Council; believes that, if the Member States are to be represented in a unitary, fully democratic manner in the EU, the stances taken by national governments in the Council must reflect the views of their national parliaments; stresses that, by guiding and scrutinising the work of their governments, national parliaments help to make the Council more democraticreinforce the democratic nature of the Council;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – introductory part
Paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Calls, to this end, forommends national parliaments for taking steps to:
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – point b
Paragraph 3 – point b
(b) provide ministers and national governments with prior guidance on their work within the Council and European Council,
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – point c
Paragraph 3 – point c
(c) scrutinise the stances taken by ministers and national governments within the Council and European Council, and
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that the early warning mechanism should be viewed and used as a key means of ensuring proaeffective cooperation between European and national institutions;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the fact that this mechanism is in practice being used as a channel for consultation and cooperative dialogue between the various institutions in the EU’s multitierlevel system;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Views interparliamentary meetings as places where EU policies and national policies come together and feed off each other, to the benefit of both; believes that a key function of such meetings is to allow national parliaments to take account of the European perspective in national debates, and the European Parliament to take account of the national perspective in European debates; reiterates that the aim of such cooperation is not to form a new joint parliamentary body for inclusion in the Union’s current decision-making set- up, as this would be both ineffective and undemocratic and unconstitutional;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Points out, furthermore, that interparliamentary committee meetings are more effective and calls for closer cooperation betweenoperation would be more effective if every national parliament were to adopt a system of rapporteurs on specific legislative issues;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Believes that, not least in the light of the new interparliamentary conferences on the CFSP/CSDP and economic and financial governance, COSAC should take on a more specialist role as, primarily, a forum for discussionremain the forum for a regular exchange of views, information and best practice ofn the state of the Union; practical aspects of parliamentary scrutiny;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses that interparliamentary cooperation must be open and inclusive and voices its concern about restricted interparliamentary meetings, to which some parliaments are not invited, being organised without proper consultation in order to adopt positions on EU affairs which are not consensus-based; points out that this practice is contrary to the spirit and letter of the Treaties, as is interparliamentary cooperation conducted at administrative level;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Notes that the ‘'political dialogue’' (set up under the Barroso Initiative in 2006) and the early warning mechanism are two sides of the same coin; notes the development of wide-ranging relations between national parliaments and the Commission and the establishment of ’'enhanced political dialogue’' as part of the European semester for economic policy coordination; resolves to keep a close eye on relations between the Commission and national parliaments;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Calls foron all Member States to agree on arrangements to ensuringe effective interparliamentary cooperation on Eurojust and Europol to be introduced;