4 Amendments of Baroness Sarah LUDFORD related to 2010/2310(INI)
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the Commission to continue to include in its impact assessments the necessity and proportionality test, to draw on the best practices of Member States with high procedural rights guarantees, as well as to introduce a test specifying how its proposals reflect the aforementioned general principles governing criminal law, as well as human rights and fundamental freedoms in general;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for an inter-institutional agreement on the principles and working methods governing proposals for future EU substantive criminal law provisions and invites the Commission and the Council to establish an inter-institutional working group in which these institutions and, the Parliament and independent experts can draw up such an agreement and discuss general matters with a view to ensuring coherence in EU criminal law;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. The inter-institutional working group should help in defining a proper scope and application for criminal law sanctions at EU level as well as examining existing legislation with at view to reducing the current fragmented approach and conflicting jurisdictions;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Instructs its BureauCalls on the European Parliament to examine how a coherent approach to EU legislation on substantive criminal law can best be ensured within Parliament and points in this respect to the current lack of a coordinating committee as well as to the important potential role of its Legal Service;