BETA

Activities of Bart STAES related to 2013/2220(DEC)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2012 PDF (189 KB) DOC (91 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: CONT
Dossiers: 2013/2220(DEC)
Documents: PDF(189 KB) DOC(91 KB)

Amendments (4)

Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 2012 / Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 2012;
2014/02/25
Committee: CONT
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that the procedure for assessing possible conflicts of interest at the Authority, where declarations of interests are screened by Heads of Unit and are generally assessed on a case by case basis, is burdensome and is subject to criticism, raising questions about its credibility and effectiveness; notes with concern that even a revised procedure has not helped dispel fears about the Authority’s expert impartiality; calls on the Authority to come up with a simplified procedure with less uncertainty which would validate and streamline the process and save both human resources and money before October 2014;
2014/02/25
Committee: CONT
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Believes that the Authority should apply a five-year cooling-off period to all material interests related to the commercial agrifood sector, including research funding, consultancy contracts and decision-making positions in industry-captured organisations;
2014/02/25
Committee: CONT
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Believes that financial interests in particular should be dealt with the utmost care and that experts should be asked to declare whether their interests were remunerated or not; believes that if this is the case, the amount should be specified; is of the opinion that the current practice of experts anonymising their interests, for instance by using the expression “private company”, should not be accepted by the Authority;
2014/02/25
Committee: CONT